Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

Mp3 V Wma files.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 10:20 AM
  #1  
andrewdelvard's Avatar
andrewdelvard
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,079
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth
Post

Just had a little subjective experiment with the 4 same tracks recorded once on *Windows Media Lossless* best quality and once on *Cyberlink MP3* best quality.
I was expecting a real noticable difference considering how much more memory the wma file took up. Infact thinking about it I expected a noticable difference right through the frequency range.
But on those 4 tracks it didn't pann out that way. I was suprised to find that although the wma file was overall better quality, the lower base range improvement was really marginal, almost non existant. Mid range was certainly better and overall 'colour' was enhanced. Earphones where adequate with a decent 8 - 22,000Hz frequency response.
Might try it again with some other tracks but again I was suprised by the marginal difference.

BTW on another note take a look at the prices of some of these earphones I didn't think they could get as expensive as this....
http://www.audiocubes.com/index.php?...cb34fb1eb96fb1
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chiark
ICE
2
Feb 5, 2002 04:31 PM
alexf
Computer & Technology Related
8
Jan 14, 2002 09:35 AM
BigGT3Fan
Non Scooby Related
3
Nov 26, 2001 06:35 PM
MartinM
ICE
6
Sep 14, 2001 05:26 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 AM.