Windows Mobile 2003 vs Pocket PC2002
23 November 2003, 09:27 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Isnt the Mobile 2003 version specifically for the mobile phone PDA's like the XDA2
ANd Pocket PC 2003 is for standard Ipaqs, personally I would go for the 2003 version, as it is allegedly much quicker, and like everything else Microsoft these days, more multimedia biased
ANd Pocket PC 2003 is for standard Ipaqs, personally I would go for the 2003 version, as it is allegedly much quicker, and like everything else Microsoft these days, more multimedia biased
24 November 2003, 09:22 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like any new version of Windows, I'd expect it to run slower than its predecessor on any given hardware. Is there any particular reason this should not be true of the current WinCE incarnation?
Trending Topics
24 November 2003, 09:47 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
actually 2003 seems to run loads faster from the reviews and tests I've seen on the net. It was a compelete re-write of the base code.
greg
[Edited by gregh - 11/24/2003 9:48:28 AM]
greg
[Edited by gregh - 11/24/2003 9:48:28 AM]
24 November 2003, 10:41 AM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
I heard the Koreans were dumping 2003 off their pdas cos the code was dodgy and giving loads of problems compared to 2002 and downgrading back to 2002. Don't know the full story behind this but think its down to basic compatability issues and probably what them dodgy Koreans have been trying to do hacking wise!
I am staying with 2002 on my Axim too although Windows media player doesn't work and I have had to rebuild the thing about 5 times
I am staying with 2002 on my Axim too although Windows media player doesn't work and I have had to rebuild the thing about 5 times
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
shorty87
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
0
29 September 2015 02:18 PM