Verification Plan - What to include
#2
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know all testing etc did it last 2 years
got the email cheers.
Just writing it all up
cool sites
Si
[Edited by super_si - 6/3/2003 7:36:25 PM]
got the email cheers.
Just writing it all up
cool sites
Si
[Edited by super_si - 6/3/2003 7:36:25 PM]
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yet again lectures give us some crap to do no-ones heard of
Basically its a test plan, so what do i include
Value used, Validation, Expect output.
How do i write it, report form or Excel sheet?
Also need some Requirements too, Functional and Non functional requirements??
Cheers
Si
Basically its a test plan, so what do i include
Value used, Validation, Expect output.
How do i write it, report form or Excel sheet?
Also need some Requirements too, Functional and Non functional requirements??
Cheers
Si
#4
Me again Random thoughts....
Requirements come first :
Functional - direct behaviour of the system:
- take two numbers, multiply them and print the answer
- report an error if either number is negative
Non-functional
- must respond within 5 milliseconds
- must use a Windows GUI
Testing
Black box/white box? (go look in Google)
Test plan:
- to test the requirements are met
- tests traceable back to requirements
Functional tests test functional requirements
Non-functional tests test non-functional requirements
Use Excel as a documentation tool to define the test objectives, log test outcomes, re-tests etc
Use a test form for each test:
- pre-conditions
- test data
- expected results
- actual results
- test result (pass/fail)
- re-test results
Functional tests normally exercise valid expected vales, extreme but valid values, invalid values etc
There are different levels of test: unit/integration/system/acceptance
...etc etc
HTH, Martin
Requirements come first :
Functional - direct behaviour of the system:
- take two numbers, multiply them and print the answer
- report an error if either number is negative
Non-functional
- must respond within 5 milliseconds
- must use a Windows GUI
Testing
Black box/white box? (go look in Google)
Test plan:
- to test the requirements are met
- tests traceable back to requirements
Functional tests test functional requirements
Non-functional tests test non-functional requirements
Use Excel as a documentation tool to define the test objectives, log test outcomes, re-tests etc
Use a test form for each test:
- pre-conditions
- test data
- expected results
- actual results
- test result (pass/fail)
- re-test results
Functional tests normally exercise valid expected vales, extreme but valid values, invalid values etc
There are different levels of test: unit/integration/system/acceptance
...etc etc
HTH, Martin
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers martin, just being reading my Ian Sommerville, White box black box
Someones said my DFD is impossible to make, any thoughts.
Cheers once again
Si
Someones said my DFD is impossible to make, any thoughts.
Cheers once again
Si
#7
Well, to be pedantic (I am, as you know), you don't 'make a DFD' anyway - you generally make a computer application that has user-oriented or batch functions that allow business processes to be performed in an automated fashion. The DFD just defines the data flows and datastores that you need to take into consideration. Heavy eh?
Being more practical, you obviously don't make a DFD 'cos it doesn't define the windows, fields, validation, detailed processing rules, error messages etc etc that make up a complete application specification (ie the functional and non-functional requirements, as we talked about above)
From what I remember from your DFD it looked reasonably OK - I think there might have been some analysis errors still in there, but it's not possible to uncover them without more detailed discussion - well, more detailed than you can get on a BB by us typing at each other anyway! Maybe that's why someone said you couldn't 'make' your DFD???
Martin
Being more practical, you obviously don't make a DFD 'cos it doesn't define the windows, fields, validation, detailed processing rules, error messages etc etc that make up a complete application specification (ie the functional and non-functional requirements, as we talked about above)
From what I remember from your DFD it looked reasonably OK - I think there might have been some analysis errors still in there, but it's not possible to uncover them without more detailed discussion - well, more detailed than you can get on a BB by us typing at each other anyway! Maybe that's why someone said you couldn't 'make' your DFD???
Martin
Trending Topics
#9
Well, just this once but I won't make a habit of it
You've got 15 minutes to spot this email address, then it's going to be edited out...<<gone>>
Don't send anything over 200K - ZIP if need be.
I'll try and look at it sometime before 9am tomorrow
[Edited by MartinM - 6/4/2003 11:07:29 PM]
You've got 15 minutes to spot this email address, then it's going to be edited out...<<gone>>
Don't send anything over 200K - ZIP if need be.
I'll try and look at it sometime before 9am tomorrow
[Edited by MartinM - 6/4/2003 11:07:29 PM]
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: diskdepot
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In our final exams last week, we were asked to outline black and white box testing.
A classmate knew what the whitebox was (top down etc) but couldn't remember anything about black box testing so opted for the comedy approach...
'A strategy to assess whether or not a bottle blonde highlights her pubes'
I'm sure that'll go down a treat with the external verifiers
A classmate knew what the whitebox was (top down etc) but couldn't remember anything about black box testing so opted for the comedy approach...
'A strategy to assess whether or not a bottle blonde highlights her pubes'
I'm sure that'll go down a treat with the external verifiers
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post