Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Going Rotated ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 04:50 PM
  #1  
mikef04's Avatar
mikef04
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Starting my rebuild shortly :D
Default Going Rotated ??

Hi, i'm in the middle of deciding whether to go 2.1 or stay 2.0 cdb. After reading a few threads on here, alot of people on here seem to have gone for a rotated setup.

My question is, could some possibly explain to me what is involved in going rotated?

Thanks

Mike
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:09 PM
  #2  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

What power are you going for ?

I'd go 2.1 btw, just have myself and it makes a big difference
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:14 PM
  #3  
mikef04's Avatar
mikef04
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Starting my rebuild shortly :D
Default

Nothing massive would like to keep a bit of reliabilty. Anything over 450bhp i'd be happy with or am i being a bit ambious

Mike
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:19 PM
  #4  
rossdj1983's Avatar
rossdj1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: west mids
Default

no need for a rotated setup at that level
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:21 PM
  #5  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

Im on a 2.1 cdb with a standard fitment MD321X and it produced 503bhp 470lbs/ft

You dont need the expense for 450bhp mate, a MD321T will get you that with standard fitment
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:21 PM
  #6  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

Get a billet md321v and your covered for loads of power.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:27 PM
  #7  
mikef04's Avatar
mikef04
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Starting my rebuild shortly :D
Default

thanks for the replies. Anger what heads are you running?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:39 PM
  #8  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

Newage STi ones
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:42 PM
  #9  
mikef04's Avatar
mikef04
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Starting my rebuild shortly :D
Default

AVCS?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:53 PM
  #10  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

yes mate

What subaru are you modding
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #11  
mikef04's Avatar
mikef04
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Starting my rebuild shortly :D
Default

its a classic uk wagon, shell is in good condition. No rust and all straight.
Just the engine is getting a little tired at about 104k. I know i'll need a six speed etc, but i have also being looking into how much work work be required to run AVCS heads?

Mike
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 06:01 PM
  #12  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

i ran STi6 heads on my old RA with a 2 litre Newage block and MD321T

It made 457bhp 410 lbs/ft
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 06:04 PM
  #13  
mikef04's Avatar
mikef04
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Starting my rebuild shortly :D
Default

Thats not bad, i am liking the idea of the the 2.1 as i read they are slighly more revvy and a lot better to drive on track. I don't know whether this is true as i haven't driven one.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 06:06 PM
  #14  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

I just changed from a 2.5 to 2.1 and i prefer the 2.1 by far
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 06:11 PM
  #15  
53's Avatar
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,742
Likes: 4
From: Standing Up
Default

Originally Posted by Anger
I just changed from a 2.5 to 2.1 and i prefer the 2.1 by far
Would be my choice also
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #16  
Olly.Wrx's Avatar
Olly.Wrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: On the road for 500+
Default

I also went for the 2.1 over a 2.0.

Im glad i did,the power comes in nice and early and the 2.1 will produce more torque.

For the little bit extra it costs its worth it.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 08:38 PM
  #17  
mazmike's Avatar
mazmike
BANNED
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Default

i have a sc46 on a 2.1 and run 450/450
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ScoobySnack
Computer & Technology Related
2
Jul 31, 2002 10:09 AM
bb
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
4
May 21, 2002 03:12 PM
mattski2
Computer & Technology Related
4
May 16, 2002 01:53 PM
David Blows
ScoobyNet General
3
Jan 20, 2000 04:09 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM.