Anybody got the latest copy of EVO yet?

Check out the review of the EVO vs Skyrine vs Porker vs Bee Em. Then take a look at the chart at the back. Take a close look at the BM's acceleration times around the 70 and 80mph mark.Spot any perculiarities?

Anybody else impressed? I am. From standing start:

...
7.9secs to 70.
8.0secs to 80.
...

Damn - that's one TENTH of a second to get from 70 to 80 mph. Unbelievable overtaking power - what a car...

Ross (Cynic in training).

 

NO you have it wrong, its 8 seconds from 70 to 80

 

Are you sure the test isn't in Top Gear mag?
Haven't seen this months Evo yet though, maybe they have exactly the same test! Although I would be surprised if they could get the same loopy anomalies as TG!

 

I've read EVO and can't remember a single article this month on the given subject?

Confused of Essex

 

Yex,

It's the October issue of Evo that is referred to which came out on Wednesday.

 

I've got the October issure of Evo with the Lotus 340R on the front and i cant see any article on the above

Confused of Croydon

 

That's because it's the new Top Gear (October 99) - M5 v Evo 6 v GT3 v R-34.

Oh, and it's 6.9 for 0 to 70mph and 7.0 secs 0 to 80mph.

Chris.

 

Is this thread allowed? This has nothing to do with scoobies. Its a fine line ain't it.

 

Maybe it is relevant to Scoobies in that most of us would aspire to owning one of the four. Personally I'd go for a GT3. AND an M5.

Anyway, so that we don't all have to donate to the BBC's coffers...

WHICH ONE WON??!!

Mike

 

Yesterday was a bad day.

Top Gear it was. Not EVO.

0-60 & 0-70 were the timings not 70 & 80.

6.9secs and 7.0secs were the timings. Not 7.9 & 8.0.

But the basic premis of the BM doing a ten mph chunk in only one tenth of a sec still (tenuously) stands Even if it is an obvious t(r)ypo in the mag.

I wish I could get an Impreza to do 60-70mph in 1 tenth...

Ross (tired & ashamed)

 

pppppppppppoooooooooooo

 

Why for you BTTT?

 

He really is a f*cking idiot isnt he?

 

:nods: