Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Final drive ratio same as diff ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 12:47 AM
  #1  
SabrePoint's Avatar
SabrePoint
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default Final drive ratio same as diff ratio?

Hi
I note in Subaru tables such Final Drive ratios as 4.444, 4.111 and 3.900. Is this the same as the 'Diff ratio' (ie: pinion:crown wheel ratio)? I ask because one source I have quotes:

"You may have heard terms like rear axle ratio or final drive ratio. These refer to the gear ratio in the differential. If the final drive ratio is 4.10, then the ring gear has 4.10 times as many teeth as the input pinion gear."

Yet I read elsewhere that the Final Drive ratio includes the transmission ratio and maybe even wheel diameter.

On balance, seems to me that if table quotes FD=4.111 then that is the diff ratio. Correct or not?

Sorry - still trying to learn.
Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 05:31 PM
  #2  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

On balance, seems to me that if table quotes FD=4.111 then that is the diff ratio. Correct or not?

Correct.

Yet I read elsewhere that the Final Drive ratio includes the transmission ratio and maybe even wheel diameter.
Bollocks.

Except that..................
European/UK (as opposed to Japanese)Subaru have a rear diff ratio of 3.545 and a front diff ratio of 3.9 but the rear diff is driven through the centre differential which has a drop gear of 1.1:1 which converts the rear 3.545 diff ratio to a 3.899 final drive ratio. To all intents and purposes 3.9 front and rear.

Jap boxes have a centre diff drop gear of 1.0:1 so diff ratios of 4.44,4.11 and 3.9 are also final drive ratios.
I am not sure why Subaru went to the trouble of complicating things with a 1.1:1 drop gear???????????????/
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 02:29 AM
  #3  
SabrePoint's Avatar
SabrePoint
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks Harvey for your confirmation. Yep I was aware of 1.1 centre diff change (none in mine in New Zealand!). Cheers
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 02:33 AM
  #4  
Arch's Avatar
Arch
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,834
Likes: 1
From: Scotland
Default

Harvey from what i have read it was to reduce the prop speed for comfort.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 03:57 PM
  #5  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Cheers Arch but I am sceptical. Why does a 10% drop in prop rpm make a difference to comfort?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 04:48 AM
  #6  
Arch's Avatar
Arch
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,834
Likes: 1
From: Scotland
Default

Prob some tefal head in Japan decided that a reduced RPM would reduce vibration hence reduce noise which as you know from prop aircraft etc increasing rpm of a poorly balanced mass will increase the noise/vibration and generally reduce the comfort. Would you feel the difference by the 10% reduction in propshaft rpm, I doubt it.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 10:23 AM
  #7  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Cheers Arch. Aircraft props are 1.5 to 2 metre diameter so noise is a factor but on a prop shaft which even with flange is only 76mm diameter I can't see that vibration will have anything to do with it. I suspect that speeds in the UK or Europe may be higher than those achieved in Japan so for some reason they wanted to reduce rotating speed but I honestly can't think of why and hopefully somebody with more knowledge will come along and enlighten us.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 04:34 AM
  #8  
Arch's Avatar
Arch
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,834
Likes: 1
From: Scotland
Default

Aircraft prop, fortunately isnt strapped 6 inches below our backsides lol But would definately be interesting to know the reasoning.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2012 | 02:51 PM
  #9  
Anthony Yang's Avatar
Anthony Yang
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

the 10% speed difference is to keep the center diff constantly spinning, so the bushings will be lubricated.

also, the transfer case can not be 1:1, or else the gear will wear prematurely.

If the tooth on one gear is always hitting the same tooth on the other gear, excessive wear will appear on the "most out-of-spec" tooth. If a tooth is designed to hit every tooth on the other gear, the break-in process will be a lot quicker

Last edited by Anthony Yang; Dec 3, 2012 at 03:21 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 02:32 AM
  #10  
Arch's Avatar
Arch
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,834
Likes: 1
From: Scotland
Default

Anthony think you may need to think again the cars equiped with a 3.9 ratio rear diff have 1:1 drop gears.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 12:05 PM
  #11  
Anthony Yang's Avatar
Anthony Yang
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Aren't those cars come without a center diff?
Just the both ends of the output shaft is used.

some thing like this?
http://www.subaru4you.co.uk/images/p...ngerWRX500.jpg
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 03:10 PM
  #12  
rallycol's Avatar
rallycol
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Default

No they have a centre diff
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 05:44 PM
  #13  
Arch's Avatar
Arch
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,834
Likes: 1
From: Scotland
Default

Oh dear
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 11:10 AM
  #14  
APIDavid's Avatar
APIDavid
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 3
From: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Default

Originally Posted by Anthony Yang
the 10% speed difference is to keep the center diff constantly spinning, so the bushings will be lubricated.

also, the transfer case can not be 1:1, or else the gear will wear prematurely.

If the tooth on one gear is always hitting the same tooth on the other gear, excessive wear will appear on the "most out-of-spec" tooth. If a tooth is designed to hit every tooth on the other gear, the break-in process will be a lot quicker
Some people do get very confused don't they?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
radave
Subaru Parts
2
Jul 16, 2016 02:19 AM
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
Lukesaunders91
Member's Gallery
19
Oct 11, 2015 11:07 PM
Jonny mac
ScoobyNet General
10
Oct 9, 2015 12:25 PM
WrxSti03
Drivetrain
11
Sep 29, 2015 10:21 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58 AM.