Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

CAN PLOD GET AWAY WITH THIS???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #1  
Alan MaC's Avatar
Alan MaC
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
From: Worcs
Question CAN PLOD GET AWAY WITH THIS???

On the Dual Caraiageway A449 towards Newport Southbound, Plod used to have Camera Vans Parked in the Layby.

He had Speed Camera Signs placed ahead of this little Greed Camera Site.

However, after a while people got wise to this and REVENUE Sorry, Safety opportunities deminished.

Plod stopped parking there as helping us be more safe, was not such a successful little project (you could say an early indicator of the credit crunch) indeed, A Black Dust Bin Liner was wrapped around the Greed Camera Sign with a sign saying no longer active.

Today I was coming north & there was Plod with his Gun resting on the top of his open car door "helping motorists with his safety gun"

I looked back, there was the Greed Camera Sign Still with the Black Bin liner wrapped around it.

Can they get away with this?

I was under the impression they had to have a waring sign in a set distnce away from the object?

Interesting to hear your thoughts AND ANY LOCALS FROM THAT AREA PASS ON ANY COMMENTS???

Mind how you go.


Regards


Alan MaC
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #2  
Matt578's Avatar
Matt578
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Torbay, Devon
Default

I think now they can do pretty much what ever they want mate
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #3  
GC8's Avatar
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Default

Traffic officers with radar, Truvello or lidar can do it wherever they like. At least thats proper enforcement.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #4  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,066
Likes: 85
From: N/A
Default

If a scamera is not marked up then it's legal but the force in question does not keep the proceeds it goes into the national pot.

If however its clearly marked then said force can keep every fine.

That's what I read a year or two ago.
Also a camera can be placed into any area within two miles of a speed calera sign.

Pretty much these toss bags can do whatever the hell they want.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #5  
jayb1970's Avatar
jayb1970
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies

Pretty much these toss bags can do whatever the hell they want.

That's about the size of it
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #6  
Geoteds2002's Avatar
Geoteds2002
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Here we go again!!
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #7  
buffalo's Avatar
buffalo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Default

i got done speeding on the way to crail. the fuzz were parked on the hard shoulder?! i also didnt reckon it was my car speeding but the one in the lane next to me, but i'm sorry to say i just took the points, badge of honour style lol. think they cant away with it cus no one really contests them or gets off their **** and do anything
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #8  
Get A Grip's Avatar
Get A Grip
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Default

unless a lower speed limit is signed (big white one with a red circle around it and a black number in it) then its 70 on a dual carriageway.

How big a reminder do you want, for Goodness sake?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #9  
_Meridian_'s Avatar
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 1
From: Mancs
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
If a scamera is not marked up then it's legal but the force in question does not keep the proceeds it goes into the national pot.

If however its clearly marked then said force can keep every fine.

That's what I read a year or two ago.


Whatever you were reading must have been old then, because that was changed well over a year ago. The police do not get any part of the revenue, no matter how the camera is operated.


M
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #10  
Alan MaC's Avatar
Alan MaC
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
From: Worcs
Default

My point is, the Warning Sign was covered by a Black Plastic Bag.

I thought they had to have a sign up???


REgards



Alan MaC
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #11  
jaytc2003's Avatar
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
From: Manchester ish
Default

As mentioned above, for static cameras there has to be a sign, however for mobile type then they can do it anywhere. Thats why they even give handhelds to civilians in some areas so they can "police" traffic
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 08:08 AM
  #12  
STi_Si's Avatar
STi_Si
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: West Mids
Default

Originally Posted by jaytc2003
As mentioned above, for static cameras there has to be a sign, however for mobile type then they can do it anywhere. Thats why they even give handhelds to civilians in some areas so they can "police" traffic
Seconds to that (unfortunately.....)
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 09:00 AM
  #13  
The rookie's Avatar
The rookie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Warwickshire, UK
Default

Not true, under the netting off process the partnerships (not the real police) were meant to have signs up (but it was not a bar to a succesful prosecution) since the netting off process finished 18 months ago and now fines go back to 'central funds' (aka A Darlings bottomless pit) there isn't even that requirement in place.

Simon
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #14  
_Meridian_'s Avatar
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 1
From: Mancs
Default

Originally Posted by The rookie
Not true, under the netting off process the partnerships (not the real police) were meant to have signs up (but it was not a bar to a succesful prosecution) since the netting off process finished 18 months ago and now fines go back to 'central funds' (aka A Darlings bottomless pit) there isn't even that requirement in place.

Simon


Just to amplify: even then the signs were only required if you wanted the money back. If you didn't care, the signs weren't required even then either.


M
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
Numptie
Scotland
1
May 28, 2002 11:37 PM
barge
ScoobyNet General
32
May 6, 2002 08:55 PM
matt d
ScoobyNet General
5
Jan 9, 2002 09:21 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 PM.