charge cooler
It occurs to me, being a race tech that heat and subsequently air is absorbed 8 times more by water than by even very cold dense air. Hence a chargecooler being more efficent in a purely mathamatical sense. As legacy's have chargecoolerswhich are reasily available and cheap, around £120 all in is there anyreason as to why this wouldnt be more efficent than the standard intercooler on my 95 wrx?
Originally Posted by Fuzz
A second rad laid flat under the rear of the car with ducting to suit was my idea 
Andy

Andy
out of the back of the car along with the rest of the air, if ducted correctly.
If the exhaust is in the left hand rear then rad can go in the right hand side, a bit like gearbox oil coolers, although a bit more hefty.
I'm sure a decent rear duct taken from say the rear wheel arch to feed the rad and then exited via the vacuum effect of groundforce...
I've jut written all that and now think you are getting at the fact it's back to air doing the cooling..
As long as the rad is more efficient (due to being larger) than the (small) charge cooler.......
Anyway I better get up and go to work or. I'll be late.
Andy
If the exhaust is in the left hand rear then rad can go in the right hand side, a bit like gearbox oil coolers, although a bit more hefty.

I'm sure a decent rear duct taken from say the rear wheel arch to feed the rad and then exited via the vacuum effect of groundforce...
I've jut written all that and now think you are getting at the fact it's back to air doing the cooling..
As long as the rad is more efficient (due to being larger) than the (small) charge cooler.......
Anyway I better get up and go to work or. I'll be late.

Andy
We had this discussion recently 
https://www.scoobynet.com/general-technical-10/498422-charge-cooler.html

https://www.scoobynet.com/general-technical-10/498422-charge-cooler.html
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Fuzz
out of the back of the car along with the rest of the air, if ducted correctly.
If the exhaust is in the left hand rear then rad can go in the right hand side, a bit like gearbox oil coolers, although a bit more hefty.
I'm sure a decent rear duct taken from say the rear wheel arch to feed the rad and then exited via the vacuum effect of groundforce...
I've jut written all that and now think you are getting at the fact it's back to air doing the cooling..
As long as the rad is more efficient (due to being larger) than the (small) charge cooler.......
Anyway I better get up and go to work or. I'll be late.
Andy
If the exhaust is in the left hand rear then rad can go in the right hand side, a bit like gearbox oil coolers, although a bit more hefty.

I'm sure a decent rear duct taken from say the rear wheel arch to feed the rad and then exited via the vacuum effect of groundforce...
I've jut written all that and now think you are getting at the fact it's back to air doing the cooling..
As long as the rad is more efficient (due to being larger) than the (small) charge cooler.......
Anyway I better get up and go to work or. I'll be late.

Andy

Already discussed at length.
Paul
He is saying that you should be able to increase the efficiency of the size restricted I/C using water, then cool the water with a larger remote rad (as you are no doubt aware
)
Seems marginal to me, However the Toyota GT4 ST165 and ST205's used charge coolers though the ST185 did not.
Surely on the move, more than enough air is coming in an STi MY03 scoop to cool the I/C core.
)Seems marginal to me, However the Toyota GT4 ST165 and ST205's used charge coolers though the ST185 did not.
Surely on the move, more than enough air is coming in an STi MY03 scoop to cool the I/C core.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM



