Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

'Fantasy engine build' time...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2004 | 06:35 PM
  #1  
chrome's Avatar
chrome
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham
Question 'Fantasy engine build' time...

Been umming and aahing about the prospect of having soem internal work done on my engine in the not too distant future..
Now, I dont claim to know jack **** when it comes to engine's- so hopefully the usual suspects can help advise and/or take the p1ss as per usual

so: The block is UK MY00
Car is running well above standard power and torque (300+) , and looking now to investigate 'bullet proofing' the engine itself as everything else has pretty much been modded quite far.. (apart from Gbox and Diffs)

running 1.35 bar tapering off to 1.2 @ 7Krpm (LINK ECU)
Would like to run a touch more boost (1.5 perhaps @ peak power?)

www.scoobyfanatic.co.uk (click MINE)

The car ran a 12.8 1/4 at the recent shootout (I reckon low 12's are within reach if I sort my launch technique out) ET of 96mph though (rubbish 60ft time)
'Flyer' (mile and a 1/4) of 143.9mph


The 'weakest links' IMO are the Engine itself and Gearbox (and driver ).
Curious to hear people's thoughts... bit concerned the block may be living on borrowed time..

So:

1: If I had to stick to 2L what would your recommendations be for maximum strength/reliability?
Which pistons? Rods? rings? etc..
CDB or SemiCDB?
(Uk is obviously OBD)

2: Ditto number 1 but now looking at perhaps a stroker kit? 2.2? /2.33?

2: Ditto number 2 but now looking at 2.5 options
(way more expensive I know- but nice to have a plan 'just in case')

Power wise- Theoretical target of 450/450 +
Btw, yes - I am aware that a gearbox/diffs etc would have to be sorted..


Phew LONG post over.. I await the 'Flames'

Last edited by chrome; Jun 25, 2004 at 06:42 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2004 | 11:05 PM
  #2  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

IMHO, stick to 360-380 BHP max and fit a six speed when the box breaks.

Seriously consider the added value to spending thousands upon thousands on an engine rebuild and the supporting kit. If you must have 450 BHP (and I am similarly afflicted) then get the wallet out for a serious hammering.

IMHO a 2.0 running 360-380 is going to be more reliable than a built motor with the power ambitions and effects on the rest of the car that go with it.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #3  
Floyd's Avatar
Floyd
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,471
Likes: 10
Default

I remember a post by John saying he'd wished he'd stayed at 260 BHP but then there's inflation for you Chrome, stick to reasonable power levels or prepare to be seriously poor.

See Harveys' web site for engine spec if you really have to do it

F
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 11:15 PM
  #4  
GTT555's Avatar
GTT555
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default

so a stnd 2.0l block should be able to handle 360-380?
my goal is 2 settings using the AVC-R

1) 360-380 on most powerfull setting
2) 330-350 for trackuse

I already have a STIbox on it and brakes

so this should be ok then?
(no need for rods or pistons....?)
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 06:20 AM
  #5  
911's Avatar
911
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 1
Default

Isn't there a 'proven' (popular?) formula to do this now?
The magic 350+ mark has been chased by many with success, and is a personal goal for Xmas and hill climb season next year.
I believe it goes like this:

2.0L Sti open or closed block engine base, v3 or later.
Gruppe S headers, wrapped and a H&S slipper up pipe of small (stock) diameter.
Decat system.
Andy F hybrid turbo
550cc injectors, maybe a bit bigger. (Sti v3 has 440cc)
255 fuel pump
Good panel filter
GEMS Rally ecu with a good mapping by Steve Simpson.
Front mount intercooler if over 350bhp, Sti tmic for 350 max.

6 speed with 240mm AP organic trans.

All this will do it, will still weaken your wallet to despair, but that factor is a relative condition to your predicament!

Best bit is all this can be DIY except for the mapping = savings!
And you can sell off the old bits too.

How does that sound?

911
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

So:

1: If I had to stick to 2L what would your recommendations be for maximum strength/reliability?
Which pistons? Rods? rings? etc..
CDB or SemiCDB?
(Uk is obviously OBD)

2: Ditto number 1 but now looking at perhaps a stroker kit? 2.2? /2.33?

2: Ditto number 2 but now looking at 2.5 options
(way more expensive I know- but nice to have a plan 'just in case')

Chrome, for your Option 1 - It doesn't even need to be an Sti base, a number of early WRX's (same internals as UK) have breached the 400 bhp mark reliably on std internals. Don't think any of them were using a GEMS ECU though ! Link and Apexi were the preferred flavours

For Option 2 - I'll let you know very shortly !

Option 3 - See John Banks for details

Andy
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 12:21 PM
  #7  
chrome's Avatar
chrome
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham
Default

Cheers chaps
Andy- have an AVCR (just needs fitting and setting up properly- wink wink nudge nudge
JB: LOL cheers john.. points noted..
Graham; got pretty much everything on that list already (altho LINK not GEMS) and no 6speed (hopefully not any time soon )

hm..
stuff to consider..
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #8  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

2.0 or 2.2 engine, with sti heads for a revvy companion to a close ratio 6 speed box, or even an sti box.

or 2.5 EJ257 bog standard with UK heads, 7000rpm limit, medium turbo on uprated 5 speed or 6 speed box.

stick to 400hp limit to save your wallet, both packages can be setup to give nice wide power band.

Extra money required to make the most of the 2.5, although short engine initially cheaper. If going option 2.0 - 2.2, I wouldn't worry about closed deck block too much, keep the torque down a little and let the bugger rev.

Paul
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
Nov 13, 2015 10:49 AM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
Oct 2, 2015 05:26 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
MightyArsenal
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
6
Sep 25, 2015 08:31 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00 AM.