Same old question!
Matt,
Yes RC really don't like them (57i) as they are oil based and contaminate the MAF sensor with oil particles thus give incorrect air flow readings. So mines coming off when I know which is the best replacement.
Yes RC really don't like them (57i) as they are oil based and contaminate the MAF sensor with oil particles thus give incorrect air flow readings. So mines coming off when I know which is the best replacement.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by alanjack:
<B>contaminate the MAF sensor with oil particles thus give incorrect air flow readings[/quote]
Is there any evidence behind that statement or are they blaming the K&N based on the fact that it is an oiled filter and that some oil MIGHT pass to the MAF? Are there any known MAF failures from a correctly installed K&N kit?
<B>contaminate the MAF sensor with oil particles thus give incorrect air flow readings[/quote]
Is there any evidence behind that statement or are they blaming the K&N based on the fact that it is an oiled filter and that some oil MIGHT pass to the MAF? Are there any known MAF failures from a correctly installed K&N kit?
Got rid of the 57i today and put on the HKS super power flow. There is a noticeable difference generally in the car seems to breathe better.
To answer Johns point, I do not know of any, but if RC Developments said Cow Pi55 was as good as any octane boosters my car would have 5 gallon in the boot.
To answer Johns point, I do not know of any, but if RC Developments said Cow Pi55 was as good as any octane boosters my car would have 5 gallon in the boot.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



