7 years ago Steve gave us the iPhone
Apple are absolutely inconsequential to the large corporations and that drive the economies of the world. There is nothing that they produce that large systems, or Unix/Linux are dependent on, or has substantially affected their development.
So I'm afarid that there are plenty of areas where Apple have had no influence, nor are they likely to.
Consumer electronics, yes, but in big business? Not even close.
It would actually be interesting to now what Apple use to do their own processing, as if it's mainframe (unlikely) or large amount of Unix/Linux kit then, the argument still stands.
If they are using Apple kit to do all their processing, it begs the question, why haven't they released that sort of kit to the wider business world? Of course, it could just be because it's rubbish compared to the rest and they are a bit embarrassed
Well if that's how it works, then Samsung should take credit for influence 'everything' in the mobile market not Apple.
You can't talk about iPhone's on here without the thread being hijacked by idiots. And the only reason this thread is still here and I haven't been banned is the mods are still on paid leave.
You can't just make up history. As much as I love Sir Jonny, he's was just the Monkey dancing whilst Steve was grinding the organ.
From Wikipedia...
Development of what was to become the iPhone began in 2004, when Apple started to gather a team of 1000 employees to work on the highly confidential "Project Purple",[22] including Sir Jonathan Ive, the designer behind the iPhone.[23] Apple CEO Steve Jobs steered the original focus away from a tablet, like the iPad, and towards a phone.
The key point there is that Steve decided this should be a phone not a tablet. Happy?
From Wikipedia...
Development of what was to become the iPhone began in 2004, when Apple started to gather a team of 1000 employees to work on the highly confidential "Project Purple",[22] including Sir Jonathan Ive, the designer behind the iPhone.[23] Apple CEO Steve Jobs steered the original focus away from a tablet, like the iPad, and towards a phone.
The key point there is that Steve decided this should be a phone not a tablet. Happy?
At least use a source where the material can't be invented by anoyone.
Oh for goodness sake!!!!! I cannot stand technology and peoples childish obsession with bloody telephones when there is a real world out there!!
However,I confess I was a Nokia devotee until someone introduced me to an iPhone
And as an idiot who has no idea who was inventor or inventee,let's just say I'm a convert
Still just a bloody telephone though.Let's not get too excited when there is a world outside our bedrooms with fresh air and all that weird stuff
However,I confess I was a Nokia devotee until someone introduced me to an iPhone

And as an idiot who has no idea who was inventor or inventee,let's just say I'm a convert
Still just a bloody telephone though.Let's not get too excited when there is a world outside our bedrooms with fresh air and all that weird stuff
Just out of curiosity, what has happened to Sony Ericsson, Motorrola, and Nokia? Could they not keep up with the smart phone market and didn't have the funds to put more money into developing smart phones? Even blackberry is dying.... It seems that the only two big players are Apple and Samsung? Or am I just being thick here?
Just out of curiosity, what has happened to Sony Ericsson, Motorrola, and Nokia? Could they not keep up with the smart phone market and didn't have the funds to put more money into developing smart phones? Even blackberry is dying.... It seems that the only two big players are Apple and Samsung? Or am I just being thick here?
Great article in the New York Times, no mention of Sir Jonny though Scoobynoob, you should get in touch, put them right.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/ma...wanted=2&_r=1&
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/ma...wanted=2&_r=1&
Great article in the New York Times, no mention of Sir Jonny though Scoobynoob, you should get in touch, put them right.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/ma...wanted=2&_r=1&
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/ma...wanted=2&_r=1&
The second iPhone prototype in early 2006 was much closer to what Jobs would ultimately introduce. It incorporated a touch-screen and OS X, but it was made entirely of brushed aluminum. Jobs and Jonathan Ive, Apple’s design chief, were exceedingly proud of it. But because neither of them was an expert in the physics of radio waves, they didn’t realize they created a beautiful brick. Radio waves don’t travel through metal well.
And no one outside Jobs’s inner circle was allowed into Jonathan Ive’s wing on the first floor of Building 2. The security surrounding Ive’s prototypes was so tight that some employees believed the badge reader called security if you tried to enter and weren’t authorized. “It was weird, because it wasn’t like you could avoid going by it. It was right off the lobby, behind a big metal door. Every now and then you’d see the door open and you’d try to look in and see, but you never tried to do more than that,” says an engineer whose first job out of college was working on the iPhone. Forstall said during his testimony that some labs required you to “badge in” four times.
Last edited by Galifrey; Jan 12, 2014 at 10:00 AM.
Not reading through all the pages but wasnt the iphone made along time ago but the tech on the phone wasnt ready for the market as it was to early in the phone industry. So left it for a while
No it was the iPad that was conceived first but they shelved it and made the iPhone first







