Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

9/11 Alleged conspiracy.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 January 2014, 10:38 AM
  #31  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob_Impreza99
The USA already has technology available to them thats way into the future, thats why they have so many top secret testing facilities.

One of the things that ive always doubted with 9/11 given the technology and fire power thats available to the USA is how could these so called hijacked planes be allowed to get so close too civilian and heavily populated areas ? If the planes had been taken over by terrorists they would have been shot down long before they got anywhere near New York, their would have been innocent people aboard which would have been a tragedy in itself but thats nothing compared to the potential death toll if they had let the planes fly on without doing anything.

They have missiles that can be launched in seconds that can hit a 10p coin from thousands of miles away, so hitting 2 commercial jets from a short distance away wouldn't have been a problem. They would have known fairly quickly if a plane had been taken over by terrorists, so why were they allowed to fly straight into New York and into the twin towers ?
You're writing this with hind-sight of course. Remember that before 9/11, nothing of this magnitude had been seen before. The standard response to a highjacking would be to allow the plans to land then deal with the terrorists then (deal as in "take out", not give them what they want, at least in the west). No one considrerd that a highjacking would lead to mass murder in the way it was committed, so why would they deliberately shoot down a plane full of innocent people? It's different now of course...
Old 06 January 2014, 10:43 AM
  #32  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nimbus
You're writing this with hind-sight of course. Remember that before 9/11, nothing of this magnitude had been seen before. The standard response to a highjacking would be to allow the plans to land then deal with the terrorists then (deal as in "take out", not give them what they want, at least in the west). No one considrerd that a highjacking would lead to mass murder in the way it was committed, so why would they deliberately shoot down a plane full of innocent people? It's different now of course...
Exactly - why can't people just apply a bit of rational thought?
Old 06 January 2014, 10:50 AM
  #33  
Miniman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Miniman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
If we totally and utterly believed everything they said then this thread wouldent be here in the first place, the reason it's here is because we disbelieve what they are telling us, or at least disbelieve some of what they have told us to an extent.
Er no. I said believe "something" they've read (not everything). Yes the thread is here because something has been read or watched something and someone believed it without engaging brain. There are enough statements presented as fact on this thread by different people to prove that!
Old 06 January 2014, 12:35 PM
  #34  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
I knew it was only a matter of time before Martin, leader of the 'Western governments are wonderful' movement turned up to start calling people who don't agree with him stupid... again!!!

I think it is right we question things we are told by the goverments and the media seeing as they are mainly made up of liars. No need to go overbaord into conspiracy theories all the time, but equally no need to accept everything they spoonfeed you as gospel either!
we do have a genuine conspiracy though, don't we - and the government has been caught lying - plain and simple

the fact that ours and the US government intercept all our online communications (dispite initial denials) and have back doors into the infrastructures of all the major internet companies

but none of that means that the US government in conjunction with the "Jews" flew planes (or where they planes???) into the twin towers

some people on here have been watching to much of The Matrix
Old 06 January 2014, 12:39 PM
  #35  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
we do have a genuine conspiracy though, don't we - and the government has been caught lying - plain and simple

the fact that ours and the US government intercept all our online communications (dispite initial denials) and have back doors into the infrastructures of all the major internet companies

but none of that means that the US government in conjunction with the "Jews" flew planes (or where they planes???) into the twin towers

some people on here have been watching to much of The Matrix
That's pretty much what I meant!

That said when the security restrictions were lifted on the official government documents from Kennedy's time as president there were several released that showed the US had at least considered falsifying terrorist acts in order to blame them on Cuba to give them a reason to invade Cuba.

Hmmmmm
Old 06 January 2014, 01:11 PM
  #36  
madscoob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
madscoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: u cant touch this
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

9/11 was just a reason to get into the war or terrorism, lot's of money is made out of it, do the history research, ww1 yanks where told by the germans not to sail the lucatainia to ireland as it may be sunk by u boats, what did they do, loaded her up with 1900 people guns and munittion's and set sail,it got sunk, reason to get into ww1 with yank public got easy. ww2 pearl harbour, yanks where told by british intelel weeks before that most of the jap navy where on the way, what did they do ignore advise, reason to get into ww2v with public approval got easy,all of the above is well documented including conversation's that took place between american leeders and military advisors,also explain how tower 7 fell quicker than freefall speed after not being damaged by the planes at all, billions of gold where moved from the towers vaults days before, lot's of very fishy things went on imho, we the sheep will never know the truth
Old 06 January 2014, 01:12 PM
  #37  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
That's pretty much what I meant!

That said when the security restrictions were lifted on the official government documents from Kennedy's time as president there were several released that showed the US had at least considered falsifying terrorist acts in order to blame them on Cuba to give them a reason to invade Cuba.

Hmmmmm
Exactly – we have plenty of evidence of governmental lying and general duplicity (on both side of the Atlantic)

We do not need to invent ones

And these conspiracy theories act like a hydra – the more you shoot then down with basic facts, science and logic the more spring up, they just move the argument

They pick on ANY unexplained act or event – imagine if every single act/event during the days of 9/11 were immediate explainable (because it had all been planned) imagine no need for an investigation because everything fitted together perfectly – now THAT would be unbelievable

That THE biggest single event in the last 100 years - is not totally explainable in every minute detail to all the world internet idiots - in a way proves its veracity

But in reality you can never actually win

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 06 January 2014 at 01:13 PM.
Old 06 January 2014, 02:19 PM
  #38  
riiidaa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
riiidaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Near Croydon
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why do people on this thread keep typing where, when they mean were?

it must be another conspiracy.
Old 06 January 2014, 02:31 PM
  #39  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by riiidaa
why do people on this thread keep typing where, when they mean were?

it must be another conspiracy.
Were are people doing this?
Old 06 January 2014, 02:34 PM
  #40  
Rob_Impreza99
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Rob_Impreza99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you watch the live footage of the planes going into the twin towers they fly into a solid steel and concrete structure like a knife going through butter, you can see the shape of the plane where it entered the building.

Like a lot of experts have said its impossible for that to happen, the tips of the wings and the wings themselves would disintegrate on impact as well as the nose, they wouldn't slice through solid steel and concrete like appears to happen. The same for the nose of the plane, on one piece of live footage it shows what appears to be the nose of the plane entering the building and coming out of the building on the other side, again like the experts have said that can't physically happen.

The estimated speed on the plane hitting the twin towers was 500mph+, aviation experts have stated that this type of commercial plane can't travel at 500mph+ at low altitude.
Old 06 January 2014, 03:01 PM
  #41  
Maz
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob_Impreza99
If you watch the live footage of the planes going into the twin towers they fly into a solid steel and concrete structure like a knife going through butter, you can see the shape of the plane where it entered the building.

Like a lot of experts have said its impossible for that to happen, the tips of the wings and the wings themselves would disintegrate on impact as well as the nose, they wouldn't slice through solid steel and concrete like appears to happen. The same for the nose of the plane, on one piece of live footage it shows what appears to be the nose of the plane entering the building and coming out of the building on the other side, again like the experts have said that can't physically happen.

The estimated speed on the plane hitting the twin towers was 500mph+, aviation experts have stated that this type of commercial plane can't travel at 500mph+ at low altitude.
There are a lot of things that don't add up. I'm not saying there is a conspiracy but it's human nature to question things we find puzzling. Do I believe Governments would be clever enough to pull something like this off? On balance probably no. Do I believe they would sanction murder of their own citizens? On balance yes.
Old 06 January 2014, 03:04 PM
  #42  
mrtheedge2u2
Scooby Regular
 
mrtheedge2u2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,194
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I don't particularly care how it happened and don't waste time deeply thinking about it....

However, two things did strike me as odd.

1) Plane hitting Pentagon. You would think this place would be swamped in CCTV yet the only thing they have is a time-lapse camera that took individual snaps. And when it showed the plan it was flying perfectly horizontal about 4 feet off the ground. Pilots even stated the best of the best would have trouble to fly like that.

2) Rumsfeld saying Flight 93 was shot down. Plenty of vids of that on youtube etc
Old 06 January 2014, 03:13 PM
  #43  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrtheedge2u2
2) Rumsfeld saying Flight 93 was shot down. Plenty of vids of that on youtube etc
potentially a simple case of mis-information in the "fog of war"

presumably he (and his staff) had quite alot on his plate that day so not time to double fact check all the info streaming into the pentagon

or maybe a better explanation of it is, cast iron evidence of a global conspiracy by the US government to massacre 3000 of their own citizens
Old 06 January 2014, 04:32 PM
  #44  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madscoob
9/11 was just a reason to get into the war or terrorism, lot's of money is made out of it, do the history research, ww1 yanks where told by the germans not to sail the lucatainia to ireland as it may be sunk by u boats, what did they do, loaded her up with 1900 people guns and munittion's and set sail,it got sunk, reason to get into ww1 with yank public got easy. ww2 pearl harbour, yanks where told by british intelel weeks before that most of the jap navy where on the way, what did they do ignore advise, reason to get into ww2v with public approval got easy,all of the above is well documented including conversation's that took place between american leeders and military advisors,also explain how tower 7 fell quicker than freefall speed after not being damaged by the planes at all, billions of gold where moved from the towers vaults days before, lot's of very fishy things went on imho, we the sheep will never know the truth
OK just a few things

Firstly the Lusitania was a BRITISH ship.

It was sunk in 1915, the US joined the war in 1917.



Pearl Harbour

The Japanese declared war on the US...end of

Germany then declared war on the US


Terrorism

'Lots of money to be made by the war on Terror'

Really, at last count the cost was well over $1 TRILLION DOLLARS
Old 06 January 2014, 04:37 PM
  #45  
Maz
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005

Terrorism

'Lots of money to be made by the war on Terror'

Really, at last count the cost was well over $1 TRILLION DOLLARS
You'll find most of the Bush administration did very very well out of the war on terror.
Old 06 January 2014, 04:40 PM
  #46  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
You'll find most of the Bush administration did very very well out of the war on terror.
where will I 'find' that?
Old 06 January 2014, 04:46 PM
  #47  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
where will I 'find' that?
Halliburton.
Old 06 January 2014, 04:48 PM
  #48  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Maz, research into the rothschilds and how they run the world/governments etc
Old 06 January 2014, 04:49 PM
  #49  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I must say, as a slight aside, the war on terror has been an unqualified sucess especially with the great news from Iraq over the weekend and of course that perfect model country that Afghanisatan now is! Bush and Blair can be so proud of themselves!
Old 06 January 2014, 04:52 PM
  #50  
Maz
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.globalresearch.ca/extraor...fficials/24331
Old 06 January 2014, 04:52 PM
  #51  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Halliburton.
What do you know about Halliburton?
Old 06 January 2014, 04:53 PM
  #52  
Maz
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
where will I 'find' that?
You'll only find it once you've taken your head out of your ****.
Old 06 January 2014, 04:53 PM
  #53  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
What do you know about Halliburton?
I used to work for them, what do you know about Halliburton?
Old 06 January 2014, 04:53 PM
  #54  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
You'll only find it once you've taken your head out of your ****.
Old 06 January 2014, 04:54 PM
  #55  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
I used to work for them, what do you know about Halliburton?
So what do you know then?
Old 06 January 2014, 04:55 PM
  #56  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
You'll only find it once you've taken your head out of your ****.
No just present something that makes sense, is logical and has facts. And I'm all ears
Old 06 January 2014, 04:56 PM
  #57  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
What do you know about Halliburton?
is it a fish




oh hold on that is a halibut - bugger
Old 06 January 2014, 05:04 PM
  #58  
Maz
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
No just present something that makes sense, is logical and has facts. And I'm all ears
http://theinternationalcoalition.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/how-war-made-bush-family-rich.html?m=1
Old 06 January 2014, 05:07 PM
  #59  
Maz
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.counterpunch.org/2007/04/...-profiteering/
Old 06 January 2014, 05:09 PM
  #60  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
http://theinternationalcoalition.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/how-war-made-bush-family-rich.html?m=1
I think as someone else has already stated, you really ought to check out the validity of your sources before offering them up as evidence


Quick Reply: 9/11 Alleged conspiracy.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 PM.