Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

TV Purchase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 12:26 PM
  #31  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

£700 on a TV!! - the worlds gone mad
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 12:32 PM
  #32  
Rob Day's Avatar
Rob Day
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 13
From: North West
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
£700 on a TV!! - the worlds gone mad
No not really.

Can you not recall the prices of the first Plasmas say 10 years ago, it wouldn't be unusual for a basic 720p to be £4'000.

So £800 for a 55" all singing and dancing TV is good value.

It's a big industries now, and to be honest I wouldn't pay anymore than £800.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 12:34 PM
  #33  
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 30
From: The 2dr club
Default

Originally Posted by jayallen
I saw an LG model yesterday in Curry's, a curved screen with what looked like a carbon fiber back, either that or it was carbon dipped.....anyone know what the curved screen offers?
I belive that's the new 'first' OLED tv that's out if I'm right?

IMO, I'd just get the best panny plasma money can buy 500hz etc and you won't go wrong with picture quality and reliability.

IMO the 3d is pointless although it's good to watch the films on it but the apperatious you have to shove on your head to do it, is not something I like doing so just pub talk gimmick IMO.

I think I'll wait for a panny OLED tvs to come out before I even think of purchasing a new one, although there's nothing wrong with the panny plasma I have ATM.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 01:30 PM
  #34  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
£700 on a TV!! - the worlds gone mad
I know, I can't believe how cheap they are now either
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 02:10 PM
  #35  
ALi-B's Avatar
ALi-B
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
I know, I can't believe how cheap they are now either

I know...our old CRT cost over £1000.


Our current Panny cost much much less (although its original retail price was higher).

Unfortunately I needed to spend £500+ on A/V amp and speakers to match the audio quality of the old Philips CRT which had built in 5.1
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 02:16 PM
  #36  
ALi-B's Avatar
ALi-B
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
Default

...oh and I have an antique Hitachi plasma upstairs that originally cost £4000

Dire picture quality (6bit colour with awful dithering) but half decent sound, due to decent speakers and a subwoofer. It weighs as much as a CRT and the floor stand needs two people to lift it (without the TV mounted on it )

Last edited by ALi-B; Dec 27, 2013 at 02:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 02:37 PM
  #37  
CharlySkunkWeed's Avatar
CharlySkunkWeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 70
From: Bangor-Northern Ireland
Default

https://www.scoobynet.com/computer-a...h-a-thing.html

Similar topic but didn't want to hijack this thread , any help appreciated.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 05:45 PM
  #38  
Rob Day's Avatar
Rob Day
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 13
From: North West
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
I know...our old CRT cost over £1000.


Our current Panny cost much much less (although its original retail price was higher).

Unfortunately I needed to spend £500+ on A/V amp and speakers to match the audio quality of the old Philips CRT which had built in 5.1
This doesn't look a bad deal IMHO
http://www.petertyson.co.uk/ebuttonz...avr-x500.shtml
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 08:59 PM
  #39  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,231
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

I'm waiting for the UHDTV to go mainstream before i commit to a new tv
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 09:15 PM
  #40  
ALi-B's Avatar
ALi-B
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Day
At a glance looks pretty good.

The only thing I'd personally sought after is full hdmi-Cec compatibility with the tv that it's being used with. Where the tv will turn it on and off as well as auto connect and disable the tv speakers. Its hit and miss on some tvs.

For example my Onkyo and Panny work fine - I never need to touch the Onkyo remote. Same with a Sony amp I tried. However both amps on a LG plasma wouldn't work properly. It seems only LG home cinema systems are the only amps that'll work right.

Not an issue if you don't mind fiddling with multiple Remotes every time you turn on the TV. Unless you have a decent programmable remote.

Last edited by ALi-B; Dec 27, 2013 at 09:21 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2013 | 10:01 PM
  #41  
nick172sport's Avatar
nick172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,594
Likes: 0
From: on sunny ibiza ocean beach
Default

pity im quiet happy with my 14 inch telly in my wagon id never pay that sort off money lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
Oct 20, 2015 04:32 PM
PetrolHeadKid
Driving Dynamics
10
Oct 5, 2015 05:19 PM
IanG1983
Subaru Parts
1
Sep 30, 2015 04:52 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
2
Sep 27, 2015 07:52 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 AM.