I wouldn't be in a place of worship due to it.

 

Who says we're wrong? apart from you religious types?

At least we have some sort of evidence to back up our beliefs from Scientists, Bioligists, Fossils etc etc, what evidence do you have of yours and please don't mention that book again as it's hardly credible.

 

Ah the lowest of ad hom. The bit where you attack the person with the 'issues' bit. Come on be original will you.

I understand, feeling a little frustrated now aren't ya? Don't worry. That's what you lot are like.

 

We have scientists, biologists, fossils. Pretty much the same as you guys. Furthermore you guys are not the authority on credibility either. Although you'd like to think you are. Much of the world laughs at your attempts of ridicule and see right through them.

 

lol Shaid, I actually think it's you that's getting worked up, step away from the keyboard pleasseee!!

 

1. I can understand the nutters and mullahs bit why should they be threatenened.

2. We know lots about tact, well we used to

 

iPhone bro

 

Really, where is your evidence of God then? which fossils do you have I wouldent' mind seeing them do you have any links?

Because we don't recognise 'your' God its now being classed as ridicule?

 

Step away from the iphone, pleasseee!!

 

Well, that explains the religious thing - you're just susceptible to persuasion by cults, Shaid

I said CULTS!!!

 

Was free on contract upgrade and chosen only due to the fact that I'm familiar with the layout.

I have up being 'into' phones when colour screens came out.

 

Why should there be evidence of the Christian God?

 

Tony **** off.

 

If you rearrange the letters in the words Faith and Religion, you can make "Microwave."

No, don't test it or question it, just believe me.

 

There shouldn't be, you're right.

Anyway, I got given a leaflet by a Johoba's the other day. The image of Jesus was controversial I thought. I mean, Jesus looked so ripped with no shirt on and full six pack (burger biceps included) that it looked a bit sexual tbh. I think it's wrong, and they shouldn't depict God's Son like that.

 

He was a joiner before the age of power tools.

 

I see.

 

People only see what they want to see....

 

Yes, I agree. But fancy Johobas putting half-nakkid Jesus with Diet Coke body on top of their leaflet. Why attract such attention to someone who's holier they thou??

I reckon they are marketing this sort of Jesus to recruit desperate ladies and gay men, which is quite inclusive of them, to be fair. But then again, it's mental perversion technique, which is more human and less divine. Frankly, I didn't need to see it, as I'm perfectly fine with Mr. T. In less or no clothes on. I don't need Jesus doing striptease for me, thanks.

 

I hope he wasn't shopping at the time.

 

If he were, our Scoobynet male massive would burn is such jealousy, he was so super fit on the leaflet, Lisa. However, he shouldn't have been depicted like that for the chaste figure he is.

Also, I'm p!ssed off with the Johoba's because they've nicked my idea for our business to publish that magazine with half-nakkid guys for desperate and naive female market. If Jesus is really that fit and easy to do such poses, I'd recruit him. He's ageless for being divine, so he should fit our criteria. His pictures should sell well. You and I will mint some serious money, then.

 

This is my ripped God..



Baphomet is my friend

 

Baphomet is smart.

This is my friend, the Cosmic Dancer >



He's looking a bit girly there ^, not so ripped. I told him not to watch Leonardo Decaprio's films, but he wouldn't budge! Interesting personality, though. Not Leonardo, my Cosmic Dancer, I mean.

 

I think we'd be ok. Most people don't like opening the doors to them, and they don't all post their leaflets, so the audience will probably be quite small. On the other hand we will have our pervy mags all over the shelves of supermarkets, newsagents etc. so we should be fine

 

A chippie of the time would have had to use his own muscle power rather than 'leccy to saw/drill/hammer so would have been pretty fit...well I think that's what John is getting at

 

Scientists are notorious specialists in generating theories about anything.

They don't know how it all started any more than anyone else!

Les

 

I see.

 

But at least they admit they are wrong when proved so! Religious types struggle with that concept.....

Geezer

 

Religion requires no proof, just belief

 

Very true.