Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

new MGs - what the smeg?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2002 | 10:02 AM
  #61  
polarbearit's Avatar
polarbearit
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Wink

i bet residuals are terrible
LOL, a bit like subarus then
Reply
Old May 19, 2002 | 10:15 AM
  #62  
P1Fanatic's Avatar
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
From: Arborfield, Berkshire
Post

LOL Polarbearit, beat me to that one
Reply
Old May 19, 2002 | 12:06 PM
  #63  
Butty's Avatar
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 1
From: MY06 STi Spec D
Post

Like I said - blinkers but now also rose coloured glasses are in evidence.
Any of you pundits actually drove an MG?

Nick
Reply
Old May 19, 2002 | 02:58 PM
  #64  
SD's Avatar
SD
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Post

Yup
Reply
Old May 19, 2002 | 04:00 PM
  #65  
johnfelstead's Avatar
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,440
Likes: 54
Post

Really, Really chuffed to bits that MG/Rover are making a SUCCESS of the business. When BMW raped it of its core business, that being Land Rover and all the R&D that went into the new Mini i thought it was dead.

I swore then i would never buy or run a BMW and when the time came last November and i had to have a new company car BMW and sell my Subaru, i opted out of the car scheme and bought the scoob. That was partly down to the new tax situation, but also down to not wanting a BMW.

MG/Rover are doing fantastic at rebuilding a brand from the absolute depths. They are using motorsport to improve its image and making road going versions to reflect this. This is EXACTLY what Subaru did when they started their partnership with Prodrive running the Legacy and them most significantly the Impreza in WRC. Prior to this Subaru were a farmers choice, no one took a second look at the cars, especially if they were interested in performance driving.

The amount of hypocrits on here is amazing, so many of you have no knowledge of history or any concept of a business doing what is required to be successful.

MG/Rover are much more active in motorsport than Subaru. They have a factory backed entry in the WRC with Gwyndaff Evans in the Super 1600's. They have the LeMans and FIA sportcar series MG Prototype, They have a works team in the BTCC.

MG/Rover are turning that business around and saving thousands of Jobs in the UK as a result. I think that is brilliant for US.

As to the driving, i have seen plenty of ***** driving Impreza's, it has nothing to do with the car, its the toss pot behind the wheel.
Reply
Old May 19, 2002 | 06:02 PM
  #66  
P1Fanatic's Avatar
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
From: Arborfield, Berkshire
Post

Well said John.
Reply
Old May 19, 2002 | 06:26 PM
  #67  
drumsterphil's Avatar
drumsterphil
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Co Durham
Post

I'll second that!!

DP.
Reply
Old May 19, 2002 | 07:29 PM
  #68  
SD's Avatar
SD
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Post


Really, Really chuffed to bits that MG/Rover are making a SUCCESS of the business. When BMW raped it of its core business, that being Land Rover and all the R&D that went into the new Mini i thought it was dead.

I swore then i would never buy or run a BMW and when the time came last November and i had to have a new company car BMW and sell my Subaru, i opted out of the car scheme and bought the scoob. That was partly down to the new tax situation, but also down to not wanting a BMW.

MG/Rover are doing fantastic at rebuilding a brand from the absolute depths. They are using motorsport to improve its image and making road going versions to reflect this. This is EXACTLY what Subaru did when they started their partnership with Prodrive running the Legacy and them most significantly the Impreza in WRC. Prior to this Subaru were a farmers choice, no one took a second look at the cars, especially if they were interested in performance driving.

The amount of hypocrits on here is amazing, so many of you have no knowledge of history or any concept of a business doing what is required to be successful.

MG/Rover are much more active in motorsport than Subaru. They have a factory backed entry in the WRC with Gwyndaff Evans in the Super 1600's. They have the LeMans and FIA sportcar series MG Prototype, They have a works team in the BTCC.

MG/Rover are turning that business around and saving thousands of Jobs in the UK as a result. I think that is brilliant for US.

As to the driving, i have seen plenty of ***** driving Impreza's, it has nothing to do with the car, its the toss pot behind the wheel.
Spot on.
Reply
Old May 20, 2002 | 12:29 AM
  #69  
mattstant's Avatar
mattstant
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

what john says
Reply
Old May 20, 2002 | 08:12 AM
  #70  
Timbo33's Avatar
Timbo33
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Post

What are people really cross about in this thread?

Most of us have Scoobs because, price/performance wise it was the best value sports car on the road. Twenty-ish grand gets you 215 bhp, four wheel drive and a great engine sound.

But what do Ferrari or Porsche drivers think of us when we pull up at the lights?

The new MGs offer a pretty well sorted body style, 160bhp and a great deal of street cred for sixteen grand....not bad IMO and there is definitely a market for it, just look at how many Rover have sold!!!

So what if it's a 're-badged' Rover 25/45/75.?...they look bloody cool and they come with sorted suspension and brakes, cool looking 17" alloys as standard, smart twin headlights and a lot of oomph....I'll have to spend another two grand getting my scoob sorted to that extent.....maybe Subaru should be taking some marketing lessons from Rover/MG?

I bought my wife an MGF last year....apparently the 'real' sportscar that some people think MG should be producing. It's very pretty, quite fast, a lot of fun if you sling it around, being mid-engined and rear wheel drive, but probably not a patch on the MR2 or MX5, and certainly nowhere near a Porsche Boxster...

My wife loves it though and this is the main point...people have different tastes and they are not sad, twa*s or w*nkers just 'cos they don't drive a Scoob.
Reply
Old May 20, 2002 | 09:30 AM
  #71  
Chris T's Avatar
Chris T
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Post


Thanks for the correction - tomcat - actually came back to me at the weekend when I saw one out and about...

sadly rover have just reported they expect to lose £200 million over the year - but reckon that they will start replacing models through their brilliance partnership by 2004.

Regardless of the whole discussion here - I hope they can come back to profitability and develop their xpower products
Reply
Old May 20, 2002 | 04:34 PM
  #72  
NotoriousREV's Avatar
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Post

The reason you never see Scoobs tail-gating is because the brakes are so crap
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Iain Young
Computer & Technology Related
47
Jun 12, 2008 10:25 AM
mplaczek
Non Scooby Related
5
Dec 6, 2007 11:01 AM
RB5201
Computer & Technology Related
5
Mar 7, 2005 04:48 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 PM.