Notices

MAF scaling.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 September 2012, 02:27 PM
  #61  
Gigsy
Scooby Regular
 
Gigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wantage, UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toneh
Read again mate ( you won't get any gains without a remap )

Tony
Not disagreeing on that point, hence me saying "Yes and no" in my response to you.

However, in answer to the OP's original question, we disagree - I say, I'd re-scale it if it were mine, you say you wouldn't.
Old 25 September 2012, 02:32 PM
  #62  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Gigsy
Plagiarist!
lol, its interesting stuff, but if the engine is safe and not detting is good to know, but im lost as to why you would fit mods to a car without a remap as your not going to see any power gains and added to that it MAY blow up due to detting.
Old 25 September 2012, 02:46 PM
  #63  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gigsy
Not disagreeing on that point, hence me saying "Yes and no" in my response to you.

However, in answer to the OP's original question, we disagree - I say, I'd re-scale it if it were mine, you say you wouldn't.
No I would re scale if need be , the point was , is it safe to fit just an induction kit , will it blow your engine ?
Old 25 September 2012, 02:50 PM
  #64  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by toneh
No I would re scale if need be , the point was , is it safe to fit just an induction kit , will it blow your engine ?
maybe it is maybe it isnt but the real question is surely whats the point of fitting an induction kit without a remap as your not seeing the power benefits.

i know your answering if its safe or not tone...
Old 25 September 2012, 03:00 PM
  #65  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
maybe it is maybe it isnt but the real question is surely whats the point of fitting an induction kit without a remap as your not seeing the power benefits.

i know your answering if its safe or not tone...
It's gettin confusing , the op wanted to know it he puts an induction kit on would he have to scale is maf ,,,
Or in simple terms will fitting an induction kit screw your maf ,fuelling + other bits and bobs Beyond what the ecu can compensate for

Tony
Old 25 September 2012, 03:58 PM
  #66  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toneh
No I would re scale if need be , the point was , is it safe to fit just an induction kit , will it blow your engine ?
and the answer is .. it may be safe it may not be but is it worth risking an engine for the sake of putting an induction kit on ? At the very least you will not see any gains without mapping so what would be the point of putting it on. If you do see gains without mapping it is because it is screwing with the fueling... noone will know whether this is safe without it being expertly checked.
Old 25 September 2012, 04:09 PM
  #67  
Gigsy
Scooby Regular
 
Gigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wantage, UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
lol, its interesting stuff, but if the engine is safe and not detting is good to know, but im lost as to why you would fit mods to a car without a remap as your not going to see any power gains and added to that it MAY blow up due to detting.
Indeed, two schools of mod-ers - those who care about their cars and those who care what other people think of their cars

Originally Posted by toneh
It's gettin confusing , the op wanted to know it he puts an induction kit on would he have to scale is maf ,,,
Or in simple terms will fitting an induction kit screw your maf ,fuelling + other bits and bobs Beyond what the ecu can compensate for

Tony
The OP asked whether he should get his maf re-scaled rather than will it damage his engine if it doesn't and absolutely the right answer to whether he "should" rescale the MAF is yes, he "should" because that's best practice.

Whether it "will" damage his engine is a different question. In all probability, the ECU will be able to compensate for just fitting an induction kit, but there is still a possibility that bad data could cause issues such as poor fuel economy, bore wash, poor emissions, poor performance, etc.... it's not just about whether the induction kit will cause the engine to blow through det.

I don't doubt that there are plenty of cars out there running induction kits without causing any of the above issues but without checking you don't know for sure and are just gambling that it will be alright.
Old 25 September 2012, 04:11 PM
  #68  
Gigsy
Scooby Regular
 
Gigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wantage, UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix
and the answer is .. it may be safe it may not be but is it worth risking an engine for the sake of putting an induction kit on ? At the very least you will not see any gains without mapping so what would be the point of putting it on. If you do see gains without mapping it is because it is screwing with the fueling... noone will know whether this is safe without it being expertly checked.
^ This. Though to appease Tony, you can check it yourself if you know what you're doing
Old 25 September 2012, 04:28 PM
  #69  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In response to a lot of questions about why would I fit an induction kit without a remap well the simple reason is I had no choice, there was simply nowhere to install an air box.

Name:  67B86E41-B8B7-4E20-A7D5-CB5769242E65-28192-000012AD404E8F9F.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  124.8 KB

You can just make out the induction kit to the left of the fuel tank.
Old 25 September 2012, 04:34 PM
  #70  
Gigsy
Scooby Regular
 
Gigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wantage, UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ianbott
In response to a lot of questions about why would I fit an induction kit without a remap well the simple reason is I had no choice, there was simply nowhere to install an air box.

You can just make out the induction kit to the left of the fuel tank.
Quality build... I suspect that's going to be quite a lot of fun!








...once you get it mapped!



PS No room for power steering or AC pumps either I see

Last edited by Gigsy; 25 September 2012 at 04:35 PM.
Old 25 September 2012, 05:24 PM
  #71  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gigsy
^ This. Though to appease Tony, you can check it yourself if you know what you're doing
you've not got to say owt to appease me mate , you know damn well I'm gonna do what I do regardless Lol

So we've established some cars will be ok with an induction and some will get the maf screwed up
Why is this , obviously Shaun's car is nowhere the same spec as mine and my mates bug is standard with a k&n kit
This is a genuine question , how have we got three different cars that have no maf issues
it can't be coincidence I'm sure

Tony
Old 25 September 2012, 05:30 PM
  #72  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ianbott
In response to a lot of questions about why would I fit an induction kit without a remap well the simple reason is I had no choice, there was simply nowhere to install an air box.



You can just make out the induction kit to the left of the fuel tank.
Pmsl , I think no one expected that ,
Cool project mate
Old 25 September 2012, 05:37 PM
  #73  
Gigsy
Scooby Regular
 
Gigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wantage, UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScoobyDoo69
A friend of mine used to have a Bugeye WRX. He bought it and thought it was running great. It literally had an induction kit, and centre cat removal pipe.

We then got talking about how many miles to a tank, and how he feels that some cars pull away from him when they shouldn't.

It had never been remapped or even looked at. Alarm bells ringing I told him to get over to mine to refit the standard panel filter assembly and reset the ECU.

Low and behold, over the course of the next few weeks he was getting much better mpg, and he said the car felt a lot more powerful..

Enough evidence for me! Heck I've even had poor running issues when the lid on the panel filter box wasn't completely sealed!
Originally Posted by toneh
you've not got to say owt to appease me mate , you know damn well I'm gonna do what I do regardless Lol

So we've established some cars will be ok with an induction and some will get the maf screwed up
Why is this , obviously Shaun's car is nowhere the same spec as mine and my mates bug is standard with a k&n kit
This is a genuine question , how have we got three different cars that have no maf issues
it can't be coincidence I'm sure

Tony
The above quote would seem to suggest that there are at least a few examples where altering the induction has had a negative impact.
Old 25 September 2012, 05:52 PM
  #74  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gigsy
The above quote would seem to suggest that there are at least a few examples where altering the induction has had a negative impact.
I'm not saying that its not possible to have a negative affect
But why are some cars not seeing a negative affect
Lets be honest I'm not the most orthodox tuner on here , but I cut my inlet up and reworked it to what looked like a logical set up that looked like it would work
And it did
Now yet again it could have been another toneh fluke
I'm not mr k&n or mr pipercross by any stretch
So when I read stuff about my car was running rich/lean it genuinely baffles me
To why folks are getting all these issues

Tony
Old 25 September 2012, 06:37 PM
  #75  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the comments guys it's been a long time in the making after spinning a shell on the original 98 turbo motor I upgraded a lot of things to accept the 2004 UK STi engine.
The vehicle is based very loosely on a VW beach buggy and is a full space frame chassis, engine is as above with a Bosch 044 fuel pump, fuel decay straight through exhaust, induction kit maybe a few extras when funds allow.
Best thing is it only weighs about 600KG :-) lol.
Old 25 September 2012, 06:52 PM
  #76  
Gigsy
Scooby Regular
 
Gigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wantage, UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toneh
I'm not saying that its not possible to have a negative affect
But why are some cars not seeing a negative affect
Lets be honest I'm not the most orthodox tuner on here , but I cut my inlet up and reworked it to what looked like a logical set up that looked like it would work
And it did
Now yet again it could have been another toneh fluke
I'm not mr k&n or mr pipercross by any stretch
So when I read stuff about my car was running rich/lean it genuinely baffles me
To why folks are getting all these issues

Tony
Each engine will have its own set of operating ideals so some will undoubtedly be closer to the edge of what the ECU can cope with in terms of compensation.

Also, who's to say that many of the cars that are "OK" are in fact not OK but that the owner just thinks its normal or simply doesn't notice.
Old 25 September 2012, 07:21 PM
  #77  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gigsy
Each engine will have its own set of operating ideals so some will undoubtedly be closer to the edge of what the ECU can cope with in terms of compensation.

Also, who's to say that many of the cars that are "OK" are in fact not OK but that the owner just thinks its normal or simply doesn't notice.
So your thinking dirty maf sensor, tired injectors , ect could all add up to swaying the Balance and putting a induction kit on could be the straw that breaks the camels back ?

Tony
Old 25 September 2012, 07:32 PM
  #78  
Gigsy
Scooby Regular
 
Gigsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wantage, UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toneh
So your thinking dirty maf sensor, tired injectors , ect could all add up to swaying the Balance and putting a induction kit on could be the straw that breaks the camels back ?

Tony
Manufacturing tolerances, engine wear, etc... all these things are why ECUs can learn and compensate after all.
Old 25 September 2012, 07:35 PM
  #79  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gigsy
Manufacturing tolerances, engine wear, etc... all these things are why ECUs can learn and compensate after all.
Mmmm I can see that , makes sense I suppose
Old 25 September 2012, 09:14 PM
  #80  
euan_r
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (29)
 
euan_r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: aberdeenshire
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i will add my own experience.

I run permanent wideband fitted an inch or two away from oem lambda in downpipe.

Car ran low 11s on WOT with stock airbox.

Fitted aps cai went out a test, got on boost, afrs about 13. afrs on medium throttle were all over the place too.

Straight back and refitted airbox.

Did read about rescaling but thought i would adjust fpr to suit temp whilst waiting for remap. Moment i saw what a massive change induction kit made i scrapped that idea.
Old 25 September 2012, 09:19 PM
  #81  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by euan_r
i will add my own experience.

I run permanent wideband fitted an inch or two away from oem lambda in downpipe.

Car ran low 11s on WOT with stock airbox.

Fitted aps cai went out a test, got on boost, afrs about 13. afrs on medium throttle were all over the place too.

Straight back and refitted airbox.

Did read about rescaling but thought i would adjust fpr to suit temp whilst waiting for remap. Moment i saw what a massive change induction kit made i scrapped that idea.
Is it a classic & what ecu mate
Old 25 September 2012, 09:25 PM
  #82  
euan_r
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (29)
 
euan_r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: aberdeenshire
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is classic and ecutek, although no other changes were made. It was so bad i was looking for non existant air leak caused during fitting. Standard box back on and afrs went back to my normal.
Old 25 September 2012, 09:32 PM
  #83  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by euan_r
It is classic and ecutek, although no other changes were made. It was so bad i was looking for non existant air leak caused during fitting. Standard box back on and afrs went back to my normal.
I'm not sure mate , but I don't know if the late classic ecu,s have the same learning and adjustment capabilities as the new age ecu,s

Anyone
Old 25 September 2012, 09:35 PM
  #84  
bluenose172
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
bluenose172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you fit the 70mm APS, it will 100% need to rescale, no if buts ands or maybe's!
Old 25 September 2012, 10:15 PM
  #85  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just been reading an old thread by jb , simon , paul (zen) on 22b about scaling for an Aps
inlet , interesting !
Btw both Perrin , k&n state , there kits maintain good fueling
Are we to hold these companys responsable for engine failure ?

Tony
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SilverM3
ScoobyNet General
8
24 February 2021 01:03 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
buckerz69
Wanted
2
03 October 2015 09:55 PM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM



Quick Reply: MAF scaling.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 AM.