Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Next car choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01 August 2012, 01:11 PM
  #31  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
The 6mps are quite good and diffrent IMO, all the mod cons and a 2.3 turbo, good power output too, not sure on the mpg although it won't be good, but I quite like them. Or for 4wd get the 6mps.
i test drove a mazda 6 mps before i decided on my mitsubishi.
have to say it was a really good car and was my second choice, only downside was the interior was a little plasticky but was a great drive but i would imagine mpg was crap.
it had an instant economy thing on the dash and it was around 15 when on boost
Old 01 August 2012, 04:53 PM
  #32  
LSherratt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
LSherratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: On a farm
Posts: 3,379
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a VXR ...was tempted by a Mazda3 MPS though and wish I test drove one just to see what it was like.


Last edited by LSherratt; 01 August 2012 at 04:54 PM.
Old 01 August 2012, 04:56 PM
  #33  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LSherratt
I have a VXR ...was tempted by a Mazda3 MPS though and wish I test drove one just to see what it was like.

it was a very similar drive to a focus st.

the salesman claimed they share the same platform and some parts, dunno how true that was though.

it has a top mounted intercooler and scoop like an impreza though.
Old 01 August 2012, 05:16 PM
  #34  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
i test drove a mazda 6 mps before i decided on my mitsubishi.
have to say it was a really good car and was my second choice, only downside was the interior was a little plasticky but was a great drive but i would imagine mpg was crap.
it had an instant economy thing on the dash and it was around 15 when on boost
Yep it's a top car but a saloon isn't for everyone, it would be sorted if the 3 was 4wd too, don't know why they did that
Old 01 August 2012, 05:18 PM
  #35  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Yep it's a top car but a saloon isn't for everyone, it would be sorted if the 3 was 4wd too, don't know why they did that
the 3 mps is a hatch, i know the 6 is a saloon but i dont think i have ever seen one on the road.
does look a little odd
Old 01 August 2012, 05:28 PM
  #36  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
the 3 mps is a hatch, i know the 6 is a saloon but i dont think i have ever seen one on the road.
does look a little odd
There's both of them near me a grey 6 and a black 3mps. I think they look diffrent and more less obvious than the look at me type of car.

Also just for the record about the focus rs the new ones, what power are they running because I raced one and took over it about 10mph more, I'm only running a blob waggon approx 340+ hp
Old 01 August 2012, 05:31 PM
  #37  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
There's both of them near me a grey 6 and a black 3mps. I think they look diffrent and more less obvious than the look at me type of car.

Also just for the record about the focus rs the new ones, what power are they running because I raced one and took over it about 10mph more, I'm only running a blob waggon approx 340+ hp
rs or st ?

when i test drove a 2010 st i was told it was 210 bhp.
never driven an rs but i would imagine its near 300 if not more.

the mps felt a fair but faster to me than the st
Old 01 August 2012, 05:38 PM
  #38  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
rs or st ?

when i test drove a 2010 st i was told it was 210 bhp.
never driven an rs but i would imagine its near 300 if not more.

the mps felt a fair but faster to me than the st
Definatlly a RS in that lime green with the big top spoiler etc, still was quick but didn't think Id beat it tbh. So happy with that. It must of gone a bit flat on top end as mine kept pulling vf34.
Old 01 August 2012, 06:30 PM
  #39  
Steve_PPP
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Steve_PPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: www.southeastscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
it had an instant economy thing on the dash and it was around 15 when on boost
That doesn't sound too bad to me. Take a standard scoob and drive it on boost all the time and it'll average about 6-8mpg at best

From driving the Ring, i manage 4 laps (52 miles) in a tank (probably use about 50 litres near as dammit). So roughly 1 litre per mile, or 4.5 mpg
Old 02 August 2012, 12:29 PM
  #40  
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
P1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Definatlly a RS in that lime green with the big top spoiler etc, still was quick but didn't think Id beat it tbh. So happy with that. It must of gone a bit flat on top end as mine kept pulling vf34.
301 bhp & 325 lb/ft as standard.
Old 02 August 2012, 12:34 PM
  #41  
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
P1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuart148
honest mate there crap , slow, 23mpg , brakes are crap
look nice thats about it

stu
If your still talking FN2 then you must have had a duff one with a small hole in the fuel tank. I have done 28mpg over 23.5k miles and very rarely go on the motorways with a short 7 mile commute and I like to put my foot down most days. When I have ventured onto motorways cruising at 80 you will easily see 35mpg.

As for the brakes never had any issues with mine. Stops well and even under heavy breaking the ABS only kicks in a little.
Old 02 August 2012, 11:40 PM
  #42  
WRXrowdy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
WRXrowdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,454
Received 95 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
i test drove a mazda 6 mps before i decided on my mitsubishi.
have to say it was a really good car and was my second choice, only downside was the interior was a little plasticky but was a great drive but i would imagine mpg was crap.
it had an instant economy thing on the dash and it was around 15 when on boost
Originally Posted by tubbytommy
the 3 mps is a hatch, i know the 6 is a saloon but i dont think i have ever seen one on the road.
does look a little odd
Where did you test drive the 6 mps then, in a field?.

Most turbo'd petrols will probably only register around 15mpg instant reading on boost, my old Volvo T4 would only read 11 on boost and that was only because the gauge wouldn't read below 11 or above 99.

Thought you'd recently bought a 6 diesel?
Old 02 August 2012, 11:43 PM
  #43  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P1Fanatic
301 bhp & 325 lb/ft as standard.
Ah cheers that makes a bit of sense then
Thought they had a bit more.
Old 03 August 2012, 10:19 AM
  #44  
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
P1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Ah cheers that makes a bit of sense then
Thought they had a bit more.
No standard similar bhp to an STi but more torque. There are plenty happily running 400bhp kits like the Jamsport which also improves torque up to 435lb/ft kits for about £2.5k fitted. They will never be a 0-60 weapon but once moving they do well.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Iqy7861
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
22
12 October 2015 09:21 AM
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
23 September 2015 09:11 AM
Adam Kindness
ScoobyNet General
0
15 September 2015 03:31 PM
ossett2k2
General Technical
9
13 September 2015 09:35 AM
alcazar
Other Marques
9
09 September 2015 05:42 PM



Quick Reply: Next car choice



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM.