I am guessing those sort of comments seem more offensive for one week of the month

 

Watch it, you

 

They act the way they do because gayness is actually a form of mental retardation which makes them act like spazzes. It's pure fact.

 

So a loving home where they feel wanted, is worse than being in care until they are adults?

 

....alternative is the rest of their lives in car system.

 

An child abused by a man will have problems forming relationships with men. Lessers make perfect parents.

This is fact. As someone who has adopted, I have asked the same questions and met gay adopters. I am now absolutely certain they should be able to adopt. Some of those kids are so messed up.

 

Oh please dont get me started on this topic,

Man & Woman = children (if both are fertile)

Why cant men get pregnant ? (although some look it)

Whats your butt hole for (parting with waste)

So my personal opinion is its wrong on all levels !

Man was not made to take seamen (not sailors) so this for me is not natural or the right thing in any way shape or form, Also as for the gay couples adopting children im also against this, come on people what chance do these kids stand at school,,,, ill tell you NONE AT ALL,,,, they will be bullied all the way through school which in my opinion will not help there cause at all

 

So what's the alternative to not being adopted by gays?

 

As Zohan says, its all banter among males, but IMO it is a gutter level banter that some find it offensive; specially some women of Scoobynet. Like you, not all males are into things like that either. I have seen a bit of life, and I know that some males won't socialise with the guys who percieve women to be an object of their aggresive sexual desires, and talk **** sex through their own @rses.

Exactly.

On internet, social boundaries don't matter so much to some. That's why such people have this terrible need to display their twisted imuplses to internet public that they can't dare displaying in real public. May be they do, if they rub shoulders with their likes in their face-to-face life; I don't know, nor do I care. It may be because they are not educated to enough to articulate, or that's the only way they see a woman- an object to degrade.

And then they have a face to call the gays out of order.


Correct. For a literate but a street-thick romantic, the phrase may denote that one would go to any length to get someone's attention, even if it means forbidden love that requires smashing the real back door of his sweetheart's house. How romatic, like eloping! Now that is funny, because it only happened in the olden days. The guys of today on Scoobynet don't mean that. They mean putting their two-incher into some woman's anus; which is crude, disgusting and full of ****. I mean, literally.


Yep, it does go too far sometimes.

 

Yeah, fair point.

 

Ok, so would you care to actually answer the question?

 

tbh my veiw is, theres a time and place.
my entire life is full of banter and joking and laughing, in my work enviroment its almost exclusivley male, and the talk is ridiculous, offensive, racist, homophobic, hetrophobic and all thats in between.
the important fact is its ALL in jest. its ALL said with the aim of raising a smile - nothing ever carries serious undertones hence the gay theme or smashing back doors in, can be a topic without fear of creating discomfort or offense.
imo once that freedom is removed, it can have an impact.

theres not a man where i work who wouldnt "reign it in" in the presence of a female for fear of offending - although we do have females that happily play along in the banter, which is great.

but gutter talk is common, and imo as longas doesnt upset anyone is not negative in anyway to anyone - but by creating immature laughter and smiles actually results in more positive things at work

obvioulsy in split sex/race/religion work places it must be much more controlled, or stopped. but imo thats why some work places can become uncomfortable and more un-enjoyable.

just my 2p

sorry my post not entirely relevant, just in response to whats quoted, oops

 

Another point I would make, is why is there such a strong feeling that all we are here to do is pro-create? As if it is our only purpose.

If that was the case, why are some people infertile? Why do some people just simply not have the desire to have children, is that some sort of mental disorder? Why do people use contraception, surely if our only purpose is to carry on populating, then we would only ever have sex as a means to an end, for no enjoyment, so therefore only engage in it when wishing to try to get pregnant. As has been said before, other forms of enjoyment would be off limits too (oral/****) as it has no purpose in terms of adding to the human race.

My comments may be seen to be a bit mental, and maybe they are, but to be honest, there are so many other mad comments on this thread, I thought I'd just join in.

 

ultimatley the sole reason for existance is to pro-create

that said there are a myriad of other influences - especially for a species with a failry complex social structure.

ensuring the survival of your genetic code aside, the evolution of society has been extremley fast, and many changes have been imposed in such a short period of time , eg 1-5 generations, add to that all the other advances in education, science, changes in moral limitations ect ect it makes for a quite confused and varied population with possibly wildly varying opinions and beleifs.
sex in humans for pleasure is a rare set of circumstances, shared by only a few others, the meaning of sex and sexual power or dominance is prevelant in many species, but in humans its taken another route and has been used to represent many differing status - but its not too unlike other animals.

its a mixed up world lol

 

And that's cool. I have my view, you have yours. My banters and lighthearted laughters with any sex don't involve gutter level humour; at work or outside. I am a female, and I am aware there are plenty of people (males and females) out there who are into gutter level humour. Thankfully I don't work or socialise with them. My banters don't involve comments like smashing someone's backdoors in or stroking someone's pole etc. That may make me laugh for first time, but then the this sort of stuff just sounds vile to me and to my associates. We are entitled to our choices. Free country and all that.

 

I agree with that.

 

yeah totally agree

its quite probable in a male only environment, that extremes generate more laughter, and theres no doubt its perceived as immature ect ect.
but the important thing is its solely used to generate laughter, no offence or awkward situations.
its fairly easy in a male only work place once you get to know everyones character - and as often the laughter generated comes at female expense, its understandable that not everyone feels comfortable or joins in.
thats why it needs to be tailored to a circumstance

having said that, outwith female influence, banter is directed in all directions, bar none! its not solely directed at females and there is a definite "fear" by males in this situation that it could be percieced wrongly.

either way, does it matter really? aslong as people involved understand it has to be tailored to each individual situation -imo no.

the more laughter the better, and from any source, including at my own expense is perfectly acceptable

 

 

Exactly - turning their entire world upside down

I think its already been answered by others

Because they're faulty?

 

..or had treatment for cancer?

 

Yes, could be many reasons

 

Smited by the Lord. Same as he makes some people Gay. Both should be removed from society.

 

On a board where a significant proportion of the regular male contributors stilll use 'gay' as a derogatory term despite the fact most normal people stopped doing so just after primary school this thread was only going to go one way.

Nice to see the SN women calling the guys out at last though for the constant sexual references to **** sex and the hypocrisy there within

 

 

I blame the Roman's...

 

I think the temptation is to brand anyone anti gay as being potentially protesting too much, thinking about it though it may be perhaps also a lack of empathy because they aren't "like that", I have a disabled mate who is in a wheelchair, he has cerebral palsy and some people make stupid comments or stare, I remember my own cousin (who worked at the same place) declaring him disgusting because he drools a little sometimes and looks "a bit spaccy", she was being dumb and hadnt realised that at any moment, any one of us can end up, through no fault of our own "a bit spaccy" with drooling issues sat in a wheelchair, Stroke, Aneurysm, accident or whatever can turn you from able bodied into disabled. Ok, generally people don't turn gay overnight but the empathy thing applies, they aren't doing it to offend, disgust or annoy anyone, it is just the way you are, you could have been born that way, I am not religious, but "There for the grace of God" and all that.

 

This thread has been an interesting read.

I don't have a problem with gay people, but it definitely isn't normal for a man to be with a man, or for a woman to be with a woman.

 

Does anybody know any gays that dont have mental/emotional issues?

All the gays I have met and work with are continously moaning and bitching about things that dont mean anything, every non event is turned into something massive, with lots of waiing, trying to get other people involved etc.

And has anybody noticed the way they are always getting far too touchy feely with women?

Makes you wonder if they are gay at all.

Also has anybidy heard of this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Thorstad

 

Don't what you are talking about....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHmvkRoEowc

 

You are stating that as if it is fact.

My cousin, lesbian, has two sons.
One is in the Marines and the other works on the doors in Newcastle city centre.
Do you really think they would have been bullied at school? Anyone trying would have had their head kicked clean off their shoulders.