Manny Pacquiao "Gays Must Be Put To Death"
what utter rubbish pal honestly, the bible " told me" bugger all (pardon the pun) i like women because im a man and my opposite is female, god or whoever the great architect is (bill gates? aliens, a piece of toast, the number 27?) designed our bodies to interact this way. funnily enough he didnt stuff any repoductive organs up our ***** so im sure he did in fact design the ar*ehole as an exit for bodily waste, sure he stuck a few sensitive glands in there but im pretty sure that was designed to give you the urge to take a dump as otherwise its not a very pleasant activity.
We strive for stimulation through all our senses and through experimentation have determined that the Prostate gland can be stimulated manually to provide pleasure, ok I think that **** sex if done wrong can be hazourdous through fecal bacteria or some kind of injury as the anus is perhaps not as robust or designed for sex like a vagina is but millions of gays manage to have **** sex, as do a lot of hetero couples, it is kind of assumed that all gay men have **** sex as there is no other suitable orifice and hetero couples dont exactly talk about it at dinner parties but it goes on, doesnt really grab me but obviously some others do.
I think my liberal thinking comes from the swinging scene
really as anything goes there, if you dont fancy it, you just decline.
lol jackclark you really are a mixed up wee man arent you? ive never been religious in my life, there is as much chance as far as im concerened that the tellytubbies invented us and everything around us than what some hippy monk wrote in some novel he was writing after a few too many "funny ciggies" when he was bored. why would 2 gay people want to do that anyway? a gay man and a lesbian doing what must be so unatural to them? i dont get that
why do you types need to think ive been accosted by a gay guy, or im uneducated or im a racist? im neither of these things. i also have nothing against gay people whatsoever, i know gay people,wouldnt call them friends but i dont dislike them and fully respect their right to do whatever they want to do to each other in the privacy of their own homes. but i do think adopting a child into a same sex partnership is wrong in society as things stand today. the acceptance of gay people has moved on leaps and bounds in recent years but i still believe (nothing to do with religion by the way before anyone jumps in) in the traditional family unit, a man, a woman and children.
I had a mate of mine try to bum me once (Not j4ckos mate on here I hasten to add) after a party, he was pissed, 16 and horny having been knocked back by a bird, he offered his services with a little frantic reinforcement of his intentions in his right hand, I declined, got up and spewed everywhere (drank too much, ate too much and smoked too much and had to get up, wasnt the sight that met my eyes, am made of sterner stuff) .
It soured things for a while, he was so embarassed but we speak now, he wasnt actually gay, just a bit of a furtive, over sexed teenager who had a drink, possibly a bit bisexual, or try-sexual as he wanted to try anything sexual with anyone, why he didnt scuttle off for one of the wrist on his own I dont know but it wasnt going near my bum, for one I wasnt at all keen on his kind offer, and the other, Damn, he was a big old boy.
So, he is married now, has two kids, took them a long time, I joke with him that it must have taken him a while to "turn her over" and hit the right spot
It soured things for a while, he was so embarassed but we speak now, he wasnt actually gay, just a bit of a furtive, over sexed teenager who had a drink, possibly a bit bisexual, or try-sexual as he wanted to try anything sexual with anyone, why he didnt scuttle off for one of the wrist on his own I dont know but it wasnt going near my bum, for one I wasnt at all keen on his kind offer, and the other, Damn, he was a big old boy.
So, he is married now, has two kids, took them a long time, I joke with him that it must have taken him a while to "turn her over" and hit the right spot
Geezer
Breasts - I like those, in fact I'm fascinated by them.
Perhaps that's a built in thing from being a baby and getting stuffed on the end of one?
Kissing a bloke - nah, no thanks.
Perhaps that's a built in thing from being a baby and getting stuffed on the end of one?
Kissing a bloke - nah, no thanks.
Last edited by urban; May 17, 2012 at 01:32 PM.
Well observed there.
Stuck in their **** stage, **** loving, sexually charged ( that's questionable. They may just "feel" like a sex god upon seeing semi-nude ladies pictures with no control upon their sexual impulses) males must be all unconsciously gay.
Seriously, One of the most repulsive and chavvish comment that is repeatedly given by many males on this forum; as well as discussing female body parts. Disgusting. The ones who go on about ***** are fixated in their oral stage.There are hetero couples who like **** sex. Its their preference, and they can do what they like.
About gaymanship being unnatural, JonC's comment should enlighten people that gay relationships are well-noted in animals, too. There is some psuedo/reactive/conversive homosexuality noticed in some women. When opposite sex has p!ssed them off, some of them become lesbian, and return to heterosexuality when they meet the one who doesn't p!ss them off. Some males and females occilate between the gay and straight sexuality, some are just happy to be bi-sexual. Some channel their libido altogether toward other activities than sex. It really doesn't matter as long as they are not pushing anything on you, does it?
If one is too paranoid or have very strong feelings against the gay, he either has a strong suppressed desire to be gay, or that person has been taken by some man in past against his wishes. Hence such strong reaction against the gay.
People shouldn't just leave gay alone, they should just accept them as they are. One doesn't have to be gay, bi, hetero, transexual or transgender for being acceptable to them.
Stuck in their **** stage, **** loving, sexually charged ( that's questionable. They may just "feel" like a sex god upon seeing semi-nude ladies pictures with no control upon their sexual impulses) males must be all unconsciously gay.
Seriously, One of the most repulsive and chavvish comment that is repeatedly given by many males on this forum; as well as discussing female body parts. Disgusting. The ones who go on about ***** are fixated in their oral stage.There are hetero couples who like **** sex. Its their preference, and they can do what they like.About gaymanship being unnatural, JonC's comment should enlighten people that gay relationships are well-noted in animals, too. There is some psuedo/reactive/conversive homosexuality noticed in some women. When opposite sex has p!ssed them off, some of them become lesbian, and return to heterosexuality when they meet the one who doesn't p!ss them off. Some males and females occilate between the gay and straight sexuality, some are just happy to be bi-sexual. Some channel their libido altogether toward other activities than sex. It really doesn't matter as long as they are not pushing anything on you, does it?
If one is too paranoid or have very strong feelings against the gay, he either has a strong suppressed desire to be gay, or that person has been taken by some man in past against his wishes. Hence such strong reaction against the gay.
People shouldn't just leave gay alone, they should just accept them as they are. One doesn't have to be gay, bi, hetero, transexual or transgender for being acceptable to them.
So why keep posting the very thing you find objectionable about gays, as being acceptable to do to the females of the species.
why do you types need to think ive been accosted by a gay guy, or im uneducated or im a racist? im neither of these things. i also have nothing against gay people whatsoever, i know gay people,wouldnt call them friends but i dont dislike them and fully respect their right to do whatever they want to do to each other in the privacy of their own homes. but i do think adopting a child into a same sex partnership is wrong in society as things stand today. the acceptance of gay people has moved on leaps and bounds in recent years but i still believe (nothing to do with religion by the way before anyone jumps in) in the traditional family unit, a man, a woman and children.
It's either an exit or it's not.
Edit:
Also, civil partnerships have been legal since 2005.
Last edited by Dedrater; May 17, 2012 at 02:11 PM.
That's absolute bollocks. It's everything to do with appeasing the traditional arm of his party/traditional voter. No reflection on what the majority approve of/don't approve of at all.
i am just interested. My mother (bless her) is of a different era and would not be a fan.I have the greatest respect for couples regardless of sexual orientation who are willing to adopt an child to bring up in a safe and loving environment. But, and isn't there always a 'but' even in today's progressive society the child is still likely to suffer at the hands of other children and indeed parents of other children who in some cases will not see past this.
Religion does play a part. The Catholic church stopped adoption by same sex couples and some religion see it as a sin and punishable by death so that will affect the followers accordingly with their prejudices albeit Christian, Jewish and Muslim to name but a few
Last edited by The Zohan; May 17, 2012 at 02:38 PM.
http://yougov.co.uk/news/2012/03/19/...riage-britain/
That is a recent one, although a smallish sample size but neutral, there are others that are in the 80% for marriage, but could be considered skewed or the same as asking the question against it, in a church on a Sunday morning.
That is a recent one, although a smallish sample size but neutral, there are others that are in the 80% for marriage, but could be considered skewed or the same as asking the question against it, in a church on a Sunday morning.
Slightly side tracking.
Do gays act the way they do(you know what I mean - camp) because of what's wrong with them, or because society has kind of taught them that's how they act?
Do gays act the way they do(you know what I mean - camp) because of what's wrong with them, or because society has kind of taught them that's how they act?

I can't recall seeing many fights started by camp men, it has to be said.....
Geezer
Can’t believe we are having this argument in 2012 re Gays being somehow 2nd class citizen’s, but hey this backward view is held in quite a few enlightened countries such as
Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia etc, sub Saharan Africa and vast swathes of the Asiatic hinterland, oh and Scoobynet
(but agree with 5t can’t stand screechers)
Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia etc, sub Saharan Africa and vast swathes of the Asiatic hinterland, oh and Scoobynet
(but agree with 5t can’t stand screechers)
Can’t believe we are having this argument in 2012 re Gays being somehow 2nd class citizen’s, but hey this backward view is held in quite a few enlightened countries such as
Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia etc, sub Saharan Africa and vast swathes of the Asiatic hinterland, oh and Scoobynet
(but agree with 5t can’t stand screechers)
Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia etc, sub Saharan Africa and vast swathes of the Asiatic hinterland, oh and Scoobynet
(but agree with 5t can’t stand screechers)
5t.
(I know urban isn't alone in his bigotry but if anyone should know the price of intolerance it is the peeps over the pond)
Yeah. Some say that gay people overact (more feminine than feminine) because the more unsure they are about their sexuality, the more they have the need to act dancey-dancey.
If that's the case, same could be the causation for some heterosexual males for acting like macho bumholes. They must need to convince themselves that they realistically own a phallus each. One of the overacts is when these mature men convey to others that they'd love to smash such-and-such bird's back doors in. Another one is when they drool over nearly naked females and their intimate body parts for gutter level "male bonding". Unless they are under 18 immature teenage w@nkers to w@nk over boys mags (normal for a teenager), they could well be both desperate and unsure about their malehood.
Yeah. Some say that gay people overact (more feminine than feminine) because the more unsure they are about their sexuality, the more they have the need to act dancey-dancey.
If that's the case, same could be the causation for some heterosexual males for acting like macho bumholes. They must need to convince themselves that they realistically own a phallus each. One of the overacts is when these mature men convey to others that they'd love to smash such-and-such bird's back doors in. Another one is when they drool over nearly naked females and their intimate body parts for gutter level "male bonding". Unless they are under 18 immature teenage w@nkers to w@nk over boys mags (normal for a teenager), they could well be both desperate and unsure about their malehood.
If that's the case, same could be the causation for some heterosexual males for acting like macho bumholes. They must need to convince themselves that they realistically own a phallus each. One of the overacts is when these mature men convey to others that they'd love to smash such-and-such bird's back doors in. Another one is when they drool over nearly naked females and their intimate body parts for gutter level "male bonding". Unless they are under 18 immature teenage w@nkers to w@nk over boys mags (normal for a teenager), they could well be both desperate and unsure about their malehood.
I hate that "Smashing back doors in", "Rip her a new one" type terminology, blokes do it but it is something that never needs saying, I tend to just, if asked to express a preference would just say something I would be happy with the person concerned hearing as have seen a chap at work saying what he would do to a female manager in graphic detail and she was behind him, luckily she took it jokingly but it was pretty unpleasant.
You can make a point without being graphic, "Yes she is very pretty" or something, or probably best to just not discuss it, sounds a bit lame but if the subject did hear you hearing my version is flattering (I think) but the other ones are a bit demeaning, I very much doubt the Smashing back door in thing would ever get you any favour, depends on the setting.
J4ckos mate sometimes used to say when asked for an opinion "I for one would like to care for her", done with irony but again, you aren't saying anything crude, the "Smash her Back doors in" thing was funny for about 2 minutes in 2009, it is just overused now.
Agree that people play to a role and try to reinforce it, an overly camp man is no different to overly macho men, playing to a role to get what they want and convey their preferences, we all do it but I don't try and sound like Phil Mitchell or Jason Statham.
I hate that "Smashing back doors in", "Rip her a new one" type terminology, blokes do it but it is something that never needs saying, I tend to just, if asked to express a preference would just say something I would be happy with the person concerned hearing as have seen a chap at work saying what he would do to a female manager in graphic detail and she was behind him, luckily she took it jokingly but it was pretty unpleasant.
You can make a point without being graphic, "Yes she is very pretty" or something, or probably best to just not discuss it, sounds a bit lame but if the subject did hear you hearing my version is flattering (I think) but the other ones are a bit demeaning, I very much doubt the Smashing back door in thing would ever get you any favour, depends on the setting.
J4ckos mate sometimes used to say when asked for an opinion "I for one would like to care for her", done with irony but again, you aren't saying anything crude, the "Smash her Back doors in" thing was funny for about 2 minutes in 2009, it is just overused now.
Agree that people play to a role and try to reinforce it, an overly camp man is no different to overly macho men, playing to a role to get what they want and convey their preferences, we all do it but I don't try and sound like Phil Mitchell or Jason Statham.
You can make a point without being graphic, "Yes she is very pretty" or something, or probably best to just not discuss it, sounds a bit lame but if the subject did hear you hearing my version is flattering (I think) but the other ones are a bit demeaning, I very much doubt the Smashing back door in thing would ever get you any favour, depends on the setting.
J4ckos mate sometimes used to say when asked for an opinion "I for one would like to care for her", done with irony but again, you aren't saying anything crude, the "Smash her Back doors in" thing was funny for about 2 minutes in 2009, it is just overused now.
Agree that people play to a role and try to reinforce it, an overly camp man is no different to overly macho men, playing to a role to get what they want and convey their preferences, we all do it but I don't try and sound like Phil Mitchell or Jason Statham.
This is why N.I. is the laid back, peaceful and tolerant society it has been these last few decades. How can it fail with such Laissez Faire attitudes?
5t.
(I know urban isn't alone in his bigotry but if anyone should know the price of intolerance it is the peeps over the pond)
5t.
(I know urban isn't alone in his bigotry but if anyone should know the price of intolerance it is the peeps over the pond)
It's just chaps banter and bravado in most cases and meaningless/harmless. One of my pet hates is the PC culture and along with that people scared to say stuff in jest.fun/banter. I would not say it in mixed company or where i could be overheard by the person(s) or other females as it could be taken as offence which is not as it is meant which seems reasonable.
Here they are, getting their awards for the best Scoobs at a recent meet

Probably the biggest unfolding story at the moment is the probable exit of Greece from the Euro and the implications of that, yet hardly anybody mentions that either, because they don't see it as having any influence on their life, hence don't talk or care about it.
Sure if gays are ever allowed to get married, the media will make a big splash about the first one or two, but then it will die a death as a news story because very few people are interested.
All IMO of course






