Manny Pacquiao "Gays Must Be Put To Death"
16 May 2012, 06:44 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do you mean anything that happens is natural no matter what it is???
16 May 2012, 07:16 PM
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
God no, was just wondering if those that support gayers just happen to bat for the other side as well 
16 May 2012, 07:29 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A little girl who has problems attaching to females due to abuse would be ideal in this situation.
Also, older kids that might not get placed with a 'normal' family. Or even sibling groups who often find it hard to get a mum and dad.
I'm pretty sure same sex couples would not get babies and under 2s (where there is most demand).
Surely with these 3 examples, it's better they are in a loving home rather that the care system for the rest of their lives.
Also, older kids that might not get placed with a 'normal' family. Or even sibling groups who often find it hard to get a mum and dad.
I'm pretty sure same sex couples would not get babies and under 2s (where there is most demand).
Surely with these 3 examples, it's better they are in a loving home rather that the care system for the rest of their lives.
16 May 2012, 07:37 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question is, why shouldn't they be allowed to adopt a child. Why should sexual orientation matter in the child's upbringing, aslong as it is well cared for and loved.
16 May 2012, 07:49 PM
#38
Scooby Senior
16 May 2012, 07:51 PM
#39
As far as I am concerned it is evidently clear that humanity is male & female, therefore this would logically lead us to accept that there is a distinct physiological and overriding biological purpose behind this - Procreation!
Personally I do not agree with gay relationships, although I do have gay friends.
Even though I accept my gay friends it does not mean that I have to be in 'agreement' with their chosen sexual orientation. Mutual acceptance (not tolerance) of people can prevail even though one may not agree with other individuals chosen way of life.
I also know people who take drugs, get into trouble with the law on a regular basis, individuals who mistreat their partner or people who are more than capable of working a regular job but choose to live on benefits.
I still accept them as fellow human beings but completely disagree with their chosen way of life.
Also I think we must always be aware that we all live in 'glass houses' with the proverbial sign 'do not throw stones'
Personally I do not agree with gay relationships, although I do have gay friends.
Even though I accept my gay friends it does not mean that I have to be in 'agreement' with their chosen sexual orientation. Mutual acceptance (not tolerance) of people can prevail even though one may not agree with other individuals chosen way of life.
I also know people who take drugs, get into trouble with the law on a regular basis, individuals who mistreat their partner or people who are more than capable of working a regular job but choose to live on benefits.
I still accept them as fellow human beings but completely disagree with their chosen way of life.
Also I think we must always be aware that we all live in 'glass houses' with the proverbial sign 'do not throw stones'
16 May 2012, 08:04 PM
#41
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well done on accepting your gay friends, i suppose you also accept black people and don't mind so much these days that women have equal rights, at least you have the moral high ground, that is what matters.
16 May 2012, 08:11 PM
#42
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did have a lot of respect for this guy, but what an absolute hypercritical **** head he really is..
Last time i looked, the bible also forbid adulterers and bodily tattoos, you f**king tit. It is just ridiculous what religion can convince people to think
http://www.examiner.com/article/pacq...-s-words-first
Last time i looked, the bible also forbid adulterers and bodily tattoos, you f**king tit. It is just ridiculous what religion can convince people to think
http://www.examiner.com/article/pacq...-s-words-first
16 May 2012, 08:29 PM
#45
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
un-natural things are, stories/myths/super natural.
thats not condoning horrible evil behaviour from anyone imposed on anyone else. but fact is human beings as a race display some truly evil behaviour at times. through the times weve displayed truly evil behaviour as a a speices imo
but thats obviously in our nature, and our thinking is affected by our enviroment, and surroundings and culture!
its only in relevantly recent evolutionary times where certain behaviour has become un popuular or outlawed ect
16 May 2012, 08:52 PM
#46
As far as I am concerned it is evidently clear that humanity is male & female, therefore this would logically lead us to accept that there is a distinct physiological and overriding biological purpose behind this - Procreation!
Personally I do not agree with gay relationships, although I do have gay friends.
Even though I accept my gay friends it does not mean that I have to be in 'agreement' with their chosen sexual orientation. Mutual acceptance (not tolerance) of people can prevail even though one may not agree with other individuals chosen way of life.
I also know people who take drugs, get into trouble with the law on a regular basis, individuals who mistreat their partner or people who are more than capable of working a regular job but choose to live on benefits.
I still accept them as fellow human beings but completely disagree with their chosen way of life.
Also I think we must always be aware that we all live in 'glass houses' with the proverbial sign 'do not throw stones'
Personally I do not agree with gay relationships, although I do have gay friends.
Even though I accept my gay friends it does not mean that I have to be in 'agreement' with their chosen sexual orientation. Mutual acceptance (not tolerance) of people can prevail even though one may not agree with other individuals chosen way of life.
I also know people who take drugs, get into trouble with the law on a regular basis, individuals who mistreat their partner or people who are more than capable of working a regular job but choose to live on benefits.
I still accept them as fellow human beings but completely disagree with their chosen way of life.
Also I think we must always be aware that we all live in 'glass houses' with the proverbial sign 'do not throw stones'
Along with being white, did you tick the no to disability box as well ?
16 May 2012, 08:59 PM
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question should be why should they be allowed to adopt a child.
16 May 2012, 09:15 PM
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The people who think it's 'un-natural' did you not know any gay kids at school?
We knew my cousin was a lesbian from her being a very young age, way before she would be thinking about sex/ partners, it was just a given.
Also had a lad in my class at infants and junior school, Gary, known to everyone as Gay Gary because he wanted to play skipping with the girls or hold hands with the dinner ladies, would squeal if someone kicked a football near him and was very effeminate. At that age I very much doubt if any of us knew what hetro sex involved let alone gay sex.
So how could a young child, with no interest at all in sexual relationships, choose to be gay? You might think it's an un-natural act but the people themselves are definitely 'natural'.
We knew my cousin was a lesbian from her being a very young age, way before she would be thinking about sex/ partners, it was just a given.
Also had a lad in my class at infants and junior school, Gary, known to everyone as Gay Gary because he wanted to play skipping with the girls or hold hands with the dinner ladies, would squeal if someone kicked a football near him and was very effeminate. At that age I very much doubt if any of us knew what hetro sex involved let alone gay sex.
So how could a young child, with no interest at all in sexual relationships, choose to be gay? You might think it's an un-natural act but the people themselves are definitely 'natural'.
16 May 2012, 09:26 PM
#52
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about single parents? either through death or divorce or other. In your mind that child should be given away to a heterosexual couple now then
Or is it because you think the child will end up gay? The same as when i am around tall people i might get taller?
Or is it because you think the child will end up gay? The same as when i am around tall people i might get taller?
16 May 2012, 09:53 PM
#54
Scooby Regular
16 May 2012, 09:57 PM
#56
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16 May 2012, 10:05 PM
#58
Scooby Regular
I know a few gays and it isn't the fact they love getting slammed in the rear that causes me concern, it's the way they act like complete fruits! Tescos seem to employ fruits, I cannot stand getting served by fruits talking and acting like complete *******! Infact it's vomit inducing.
So to some up, fruity ******* should be executed. Gays not so much.
So to some up, fruity ******* should be executed. Gays not so much.
