Teachers' striking
#151
Scooby Regular
I have been involved in Education longer than you have been alive!
EH? You telling me that's a job? Good God I do that as a hobby after my proper job
#153
1. There has been a massive growth in the public sector workforce in the past decade.
2. People are living longer with average life expectancy of early to mid eighties for both men and women meaning that pensions will have to continue paying out for 20 to 25 years after retiring at 60.
3. Currently, contributions from public sector employees do not cover the full cost of these schemes and falling short by £10bn a year which is current paid for by the taxpayer and this deficit is set to increase if there is no change.
Are you honestly suggesting that the Government do nothing and to leave the public sector pension as it is and let many low paid private sector employees, who don't have pensions of their own, continue to subsidise the public sector final salary pensions?
I'm hearing a lot of "don't touch our pensions", which is understandable, but nothing to address the £30bn public sector pension deficit.
#154
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you propose the Government do instead to address the current £30bn pension deficit? Consider that:
1. There has been a massive growth in the public sector workforce in the past decade.
2. People are living longer with average life expectancy of early to mid eighties for both men and women meaning that pensions will have to continue paying out for 20 to 25 years after retiring at 60.
3. Currently, contributions from public sector employees do not cover the full cost of these schemes and falling short by £10bn a year which is current paid for by the taxpayer and this deficit is set to increase if there is no change.
Are you honestly suggesting that the Government do nothing and to leave the public sector pension as it is and let many low paid private sector employees, who don't have pensions of their own, continue to subsidise the public sector final salary pensions?
I'm hearing a lot of "don't touch our pensions", which is understandable, but nothing to address the £30bn public sector pension deficit.
1. There has been a massive growth in the public sector workforce in the past decade.
2. People are living longer with average life expectancy of early to mid eighties for both men and women meaning that pensions will have to continue paying out for 20 to 25 years after retiring at 60.
3. Currently, contributions from public sector employees do not cover the full cost of these schemes and falling short by £10bn a year which is current paid for by the taxpayer and this deficit is set to increase if there is no change.
Are you honestly suggesting that the Government do nothing and to leave the public sector pension as it is and let many low paid private sector employees, who don't have pensions of their own, continue to subsidise the public sector final salary pensions?
I'm hearing a lot of "don't touch our pensions", which is understandable, but nothing to address the £30bn public sector pension deficit.
Here's a crazy *** idea.... let ALL those people out there who work hard and pay tax fight for what they think is right, and the government can punish those to blame...
#155
The taxpayers and I mean the real tax payers are fighting for what they think is right, which is why you will find there is little support or sympathy from the private sector. They don't think it's fair that each and every private sector employee should pay what amounts to nearly £1600 a year to pay for the £30bn public sector pension black hole and also why they are paying 11% National Insurance when public sector employee pay only 9.4%. So what do you think the Government should do instead?
Last edited by jonc; 20 June 2011 at 11:25 PM.
#156
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Labour made the public sector a kind of welfare device a) to shore up their support and b) to reduce the number of unemployed.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
#157
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Labour made the public sector a kind of welfare device a) to shore up their support and b) to reduce the number of unemployed.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
#159
Scooby Regular
The grammar and content also points to about 21 years of age .....
I am very close, aren't I?
#162
Getting back to the OP......
Why should teachers pre 2007 get 75% of their salary as a pension for working 30 years while NHS workers get 50% of their salary for working 40 years........
NHS workers have to work 10 years longer to get 25% less pension.
Tinytim....how is that fair ?
Shaun
Why should teachers pre 2007 get 75% of their salary as a pension for working 30 years while NHS workers get 50% of their salary for working 40 years........
NHS workers have to work 10 years longer to get 25% less pension.
Tinytim....how is that fair ?
Shaun
#163
Scooby Regular
It's not fair ...
Teachers really are one of those sanctimonious occupations who think they deserve much better than the rest of us!
Well, I've got news for them - as long as it is the average man/woman in the street who are paying their fat wages, paying their fatter Pensions and allowing them 12 weeks holiday then you stop bleating and moaning!
Teachers really are one of those sanctimonious occupations who think they deserve much better than the rest of us!
Well, I've got news for them - as long as it is the average man/woman in the street who are paying their fat wages, paying their fatter Pensions and allowing them 12 weeks holiday then you stop bleating and moaning!
#164
Guest
Posts: n/a
Labour made the public sector a kind of welfare device a) to shore up their support and b) to reduce the number of unemployed.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
TDW: why do your posts appear twice? Appear twice ....
Dave
#165
Labour made the public sector a kind of welfare device a) to shore up their support and b) to reduce the number of unemployed.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
Teachers etc and Doctors did very well out of this indeed, as well as council management etc who drew huge salaries as 'executives' and had a license to spunk money on anything and everything.
It all worked during the 'boom' though.
What I find funny is that pslewis (a massive Labour supporter) should be on here slagging off pay and conditions his beloved party created.
Just the job to keep them winning elections of course until their last PM and the true story about the country's finances came to light. Frantic efforts to blame it all on the recession dont work, especially since they did nothing to regulate the bank's shameful fiddling which was at the heart of the recession of course.
I cannot believe PSL saying what he just has about his blazing support for Labour during their years in power. Mind you, he will say the same about my political beliefs regardless of the fact that I have said before that I am apolitical.
At the moment I am not impressed!
Les
#166
But their day ends at 3:30 so its not that unpaid is it when normal peeps are at work 9 to 6pm every day with two weeks off if they are lucky and having to fork out a fortune on childcare because the schools are shut for 6 weeks at a time...
Sure a lesson plan lasts a good few years too if pushed!
5t.
Sure a lesson plan lasts a good few years too if pushed!
5t.
My mother is a teacher, she has worked hard for 25 years as a teacher, and it now being told that she will need to work another 20 years before she might be able to retire and with their pension plans being reduced the way they are she'll barely have anything for her 45 years of work.
Teachers do not get paid overtime, yet every Sunday my mother sits at the dining room table and works for hours planning lessons and also a lot of times she doesn't get home from work until 6pm at night due to the work she has to complete after the school day has finished, do you think a child's book gets marked by magic? or the their test papers?
Also there's new ideas being discussed in government about teachers having to do mandatory summer schools during the summer holidays, so don't get on your high horse about that either as teachers may soon have to pay for childcare for their own children while they are out, teaching and looking after other people's.
Another thing, worth mentioning, a lot of teachers have lost their jobs recently, due to the cuts government have made in the education sector. Which has meant that the teachers who have been fortunate to keep their jobs, now have to have a larger number of children in their classes, which means that they are under huge pressures at work. You imagine trying to control 30 or more children, let alone having to teach them things at the same time.
Have you also heard about their pay freeze which is going to last at least two years if not longer? With the ideas and plans the government have in place to do with education my mum could end up having the same take home pay as a train driver in the next few years.
All they're doing is a strike for one day. I personally believe they are entitled to it.
#167
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My mother is a teacher, she has worked hard for 25 years as a teacher, and it now being told that she will need to work another 20 years before she might be able to retire and with their pension plans being reduced the way they are she'll barely have anything for her 45 years of work.
#169
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#171
Scooby Regular
have you any idea the amount of hours it takes teachers to write reports for parents to read about their children? or how long it takes to plan a lesson? Of course a lesson plan cannot last years when the curriculum is being changed and the government are implementing 'new and improved ways to develop learning' every few months.
Let me put you straight on a few things - just so that you get both sides of the debate.
Teachers are contracted to work 26 hours a week, that is their directed time - most other workers have to work a directed time of 40 hours per week!
Within those 26 hours Teachers have allocated time for marking and suchlike - if they are bad at Time Management then that is no reason for requesting sympathy here.
My mother is a teacher, she has worked hard for 25 years as a teacher, and it now being told that she will need to work another 20 years before she might be able to retire and with their pension plans being reduced the way they are she'll barely have anything for her 45 years of work.
Considering your Mum must have started Teaching at age 23 (the very youngest she could have in the mid 80's) .... she has done 25 years, making her 48 now (sorry, Mum!). The suggestion is that they work till 66, thats 18 years left - not the 20 you claim.
But, please bear in mind that your Mum can draw her current Pension of 75% of her Salary within 10 years!! ..... so, given her pay of around £50,000 - she will be on 75% of this in 10 years = £37,500. If she continues to work she will receive this PLUS her £50,000 a year until the new retirement age.
That's £87,500 a year!! I'm sure everyone reading this who pay Teachers huge wages and also fund their lavish Pension will think that a very reasonable remuneration!!
How is that barely having anything?
Teachers do not get paid overtime, yet every Sunday my mother sits at the dining room table and works for hours planning lessons and also a lot of times she doesn't get home from work until 6pm at night due to the work she has to complete after the school day has finished, do you think a child's book gets marked by magic? or the their test papers?
You may not be aware that a lot of people do not get paid overtime - I don't for one!! They also don't get 12 weeks holiday like Teachers do!!
So, forgive me if I don't cry for them!!
PLUS, your Mum along with ALL other Teachers will get a 7.5% Pay Increment in September - they get this EVERY September ................ all we have asked is that they don't get TWO payrises this year and next!!
The workers who are paying the vast Teachers wages are suffering a REAL pay freeze .... as they have no ancient Pay Spines to climb up automatically!!!
I will repeat that for everyone - Teachers will get a 7.5% Pay hike up their scales in September ............. anyone else getting 7.5% Pay rise?
It is un-professional, un-ethical, not needed and a disgraceful waste of a childs life!!
Teachers get all up their ***** about parents taking their kids out of school .... and here they are, taking all of the children in the land out of school !!!!
In our single school, 1100 school days will be lost on Thursday and that is a disgrace - those who strike should be Sacked IMO!!!
Let your Mum see this and ask her to refute any of it!
#172
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#173
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The children are entitled to an education on that day - that's what!!!!
It is un-professional, un-ethical, not needed and a disgraceful waste of a childs life!!
Teachers get all up their ***** about parents taking their kids out of school .... and here they are, taking all of the children in the land out of school !!!!
In our single school, 1100 school days will be lost on Thursday and that is a disgrace - those who strike should be Sacked IMO!!!
Let your Mum see this and ask her to refute any of it!
It is un-professional, un-ethical, not needed and a disgraceful waste of a childs life!!
Teachers get all up their ***** about parents taking their kids out of school .... and here they are, taking all of the children in the land out of school !!!!
In our single school, 1100 school days will be lost on Thursday and that is a disgrace - those who strike should be Sacked IMO!!!
Let your Mum see this and ask her to refute any of it!
The Gov really needs to go to war with these unions and sort them out.
#174
Pretty much could have been when I was at school with our Gestapo Head of School and his subordinates who had a propensity for dishing out detention and projecting blackboard rubber at high velocity with unnatural accuracy. Taught me a thing or two, none of the namby-pamby education of today.
#176
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I won't retire on 75% of my salary. I'll be lucky to receive 10% the way it's going.
Then what? Firstly, they won't get paid. Secondly, many employers will not be happy that half their workforce is off due to some teachers crying about having to work till the rest of us have to. So what then? Maybe disciplinary measure will be taken by the employer against the employee. How fair is that?
Get child care I hear you shout. Really? Don't they already pay that to teachers to look after their children through the day? So now they have to pay twice. Only how many low income families can afford to pay for child care? Not many.
Of course the teachers should strike. Not like it doesn't affect everybody else. Selfish tw.ats.
#177
Scooby Regular
#178
Originally Posted by pslewis
It's RIDICULOUS - not REDICULOUS .... just one pointer which tells me you are in your early 20's.
Originally Posted by pslewis
Not one was Compulsary!!!
#180
I didn't say having to retire at an older age was unreasonable, but i do think that having a pension cut when working on a salary that is already low, is unreasonable.