Teachers' striking
#331
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is your point anyway? That the needs of the Teachers out way the needs of the taxpayers? That the Teachers are tok use collective action to bully the people (taxpayers) into paying them more than they would get otherwise?
If you are saying that Teachers are a special interest group, then your argument ends because it is not justifiable by any means other than selfish ones. It makes Teachers no better than Bankers, or any other corrupt elite.
#332
Therefore, a Teacher taking the 'old' Pension at age 60 will receive 75% of their final salary at that point (£37,500 based on the current Teacher average pay).
If this Teacher, on £50,000, decides to work on to 66 - adding to the 'new' Pension years - then from age 60 to age 66 they will be getting £87,500 a year!!!
If this Teacher, on £50,000, decides to work on to 66 - adding to the 'new' Pension years - then from age 60 to age 66 they will be getting £87,500 a year!!!
The only way a teacher could collect their accrued pension at 60 is by retiring. Even allowing for your age diminished IQ, surely you don't think that the employer will continue to pay them a salary after retirement?
#333
Scooby Regular
This way they receive their 75% of Final Pay Pension at 60 .... whether they are working or not! In essence, we pay them TWICE from the age 60 to 66!!
#334
Scooby Regular
See the post above!
#335
Scooby Regular
I've got an idea ..... if the Pension is so crap why don't they opt out of their Pensions and collect at 60?
Simple ......
PLUS did you all know that Teachers pay less NI than the rest of us? That's because they 'opted out' of SERPS ..... which reduced their contributions. Yet another thing we (the Taxpayers are funding!
Simple ......
PLUS did you all know that Teachers pay less NI than the rest of us? That's because they 'opted out' of SERPS ..... which reduced their contributions. Yet another thing we (the Taxpayers are funding!
#337
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#338
Scooby Regular
Round here Wednesday was an INSET day .... Thursday a Strike Day .... and, Friday - well, Friday was down the Pub at lunchtime day!!
If it wasn't ruining childrens lives it would be bloody funny!
If it wasn't ruining childrens lives it would be bloody funny!
#341
Scooby Regular
Loads of Teachers are looking for jobs ..... school kids could see the cushy number and went to Uni to become Teachers.
The result is that there way too many to go around ... sack the strikers and hire those youngsters on the new Terms and Conditions.
The result is that there way too many to go around ... sack the strikers and hire those youngsters on the new Terms and Conditions.
#343
Scooby Regular
Are you trying to tell me that they cannot freeze their Pension on the old Terms and collect at 60 then?
You KNOW they can!! So, who is the stupid one? Idiot!
You KNOW they can!! So, who is the stupid one? Idiot!
#344
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember back in the late 90's when I graduated it was very unfashionable to become a Teacher.
#345
Scooby Regular
Having the right to strike does not mean it should be exercised.
What is your point anyway? That the needs of the Teachers out way the needs of the taxpayers? That the Teachers are tok use collective action to bully the people (taxpayers) into paying them more than they would get otherwise?
If you are saying that Teachers are a special interest group, then your argument ends because it is not justifiable by any means other than selfish ones. It makes Teachers no better than Bankers, or any other corrupt elite.
What is your point anyway? That the needs of the Teachers out way the needs of the taxpayers? That the Teachers are tok use collective action to bully the people (taxpayers) into paying them more than they would get otherwise?
If you are saying that Teachers are a special interest group, then your argument ends because it is not justifiable by any means other than selfish ones. It makes Teachers no better than Bankers, or any other corrupt elite.
if people used the energy they put into whinging and moaning into bettering their lives then maybe, just maybe they would not have to post 11 pages of sh1te on the internet.
#346
Originally Posted by pslewis
Are you trying to tell me that they cannot freeze their Pension on the old Terms and collect at 60 then?
What is certain, is that you can't take your accrued pension at 60 and continue to collect your salary, which is what you are suggesting.
Originally Posted by pslewis
So, who is the stupid one? Idiot!
#348
PSL
I'm not sure about the teachers pension but when the Labour Government "recruited" 1000 new NHS consultants a few years ago they "retired" 1000 old consultants, paid them the full 40/80 ths and then re-employed them again..
1000 new consultants for the NHS
Daryl..........are you saying the current retirement age for teachers is 67 ?
Shaun
I'm not sure about the teachers pension but when the Labour Government "recruited" 1000 new NHS consultants a few years ago they "retired" 1000 old consultants, paid them the full 40/80 ths and then re-employed them again..
1000 new consultants for the NHS
Daryl..........are you saying the current retirement age for teachers is 67 ?
Shaun
#350
Originally Posted by Midlife......
Daryl..........are you saying the current retirement age for teachers is 67 ?
Shaun
#351
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
Therefore, a Teacher taking the 'old' Pension at age 60 will receive 75% of their final salary at that point (£37,500 based on the current Teacher average pay).
If this Teacher, on £50,000, decides to work on to 66 - adding to the 'new' Pension years - then from age 60 to age 66 they will be getting £87,500 a year!!!
If this Teacher, on £50,000, decides to work on to 66 - adding to the 'new' Pension years - then from age 60 to age 66 they will be getting £87,500 a year!!!
No Shaun - they simply have to freeze their current Pension and then start anew in the new one ....... the only possible stumbling block is that the Trustees can block their new application (but won't as they need the contributions).
This way they receive their 75% of Final Pay Pension at 60 .... whether they are working or not! In essence, we pay them TWICE from the age 60 to 66!!
This way they receive their 75% of Final Pay Pension at 60 .... whether they are working or not! In essence, we pay them TWICE from the age 60 to 66!!
#352
Daryl
So what's unfair about equalising the retirement age at 65 for Teachers and NHS workers?
On the new Teachers pension scheme the final pension is two-thirds of final salary whereas on retirement at 65 the NHS pension only pays out half.
Is that fair?
Shaun
So what's unfair about equalising the retirement age at 65 for Teachers and NHS workers?
On the new Teachers pension scheme the final pension is two-thirds of final salary whereas on retirement at 65 the NHS pension only pays out half.
Is that fair?
Shaun
#355
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
I'd put myself in the third option. I can see it from the teacher's point of view, it's moving the goal posts by the Government whilst making sure their own ***** are well and truly covered. Makes a mockery of the mantra 'we're all in it together'. I can also see that savings have to be made following the profligacy of the previous administration. I think there should be some give and take from both sides.
#356
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd put myself in the third option. I can see it from the teacher's point of view, it's moving the goal posts by the Government whilst making sure their own ***** are well and truly covered. Makes a mockery of the mantra 'we're all in it together'. I can also see that savings have to be made following the profligacy of the previous administration. I think there should be some give and take from both sides.
#357
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
The further one tracks the argument back, the more complex it becomes. One could blame Alan Greenspan and if one blames AG one could blame Ayn Rand or the early (absolute) free market economists and thinkers or China for devaluing their currency and so on. I don't like the idea that people (particularly those in the private sector) want teachers to lose out because they're struggling, too; seems to me to be a poor position to hold. I think the whole event is riddled with unfairness and affected by that are the leadership having to make difficult decisions, the people on the recieving end, the pupils, the profession, the taxpayer, hodgy - the whole country. I think it's very much worth looking at the root cause, arguably external, before we start falling out amongst ourselves. Ultimately, there will be no right or wrong resolution, just one that inflicts the least pain upon all concerned. Shame Mark Serwotka's involved - he riminds of the Union leaders I dealt with when I was a sales and customer service manager at The Royal Mail; concerned predominantly, in my judgement, with their ego rather than the organisation, its members and the country.
There has been a lot of vitriol thrown about in this thread, unedifying to say the least. The situation has to be viewed in it's present form, your nod to the two notable figures above in my opinion has very little to do with the current plight. Indeed Ms. Rand was seen as a bit of crackpot in some circles however we are digressing. There has to be some change but the eagerness by those who wish to implement the change is balanced by the reluctance of the teachers to accept it. It's a catch 22 situation with neither side wishing to relinquish any ground. The likes of Serwotka will only further antagonise the issue. Whilst collecting their hundred k plus earnings they whip their members in to a frenzy of militant furore. A sad and seemingly impossible situation where in my opinion the teachers will have to accept the changes.
Last edited by Maz; 02 July 2011 at 02:39 PM.
#358
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There has been a lot of vitriol thrown about in this thread, unedifying to say the least. The situation has to be viewed in it's present form, your nod to the two notable figures above in my opinion has very little to do with the current plight. Indeed Ms. Rand was seen as a bit of crackpot in some circles however we are digressing. There has to be some change but the eagerness by those who wish to implement the change is balanced by the reluctance of the teachers to accept it. It's a catch 22 situation with neither side wishing to relinquish any ground. The likes of Serwotka will only further antagonise the issue. Whilst collecting their hundred k plus earnings they whip their members in to a frenzy of militant furore. A sad and seemingly impossible situation where in my opinion the teachers will have to accept the changes.
#359
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
I think the philosophising may be a little deep in the context of the thread However you do make a valid intimation. It's funny how we can have an opinion which doesn't demonise teachers or insult other posters. There's been a lot of that unnecessarily in the preceding eleven pages.
#360
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe, but it comes down to the needs of the market (and Capital) ultimately, I'd rather look to Marx for why a socialist state cannot sustain.