Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

no Insurance you lose ya car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 April 2011, 08:45 AM
  #31  
gpssti4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
gpssti4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DannyM
i think it was my generation that did that. i was i'm 22 now and i paid £1,600 for my 53 plate Clio in 2006 when it was worth £3,000

now new drivers are paying triple what i had to pay. which is hardly surprising considering the some of the idiots i knew from school some how wrote of 4 cars in one year.
Should be 3 strikes and you're out - for both young drivers and new drivers. Three fault accidents in a year and the insurance company should refuse to insure you.
Old 28 April 2011, 10:18 AM
  #32  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pramas
PS iam i right in thinking if hit by an uninsured driver the last insurance company to cover cars has to pay for it? my boss was hit by 1 last year and didnt get a bean

Don't think so.

My eldest was hit by an uninsured driver, his own insurance stumped up as he was Fully Comp, but he lost his £750 excess. Had he been only third party etc, I'm not sure WHAT would have hapened.

We eventually got the excess back, and his insurers to accept that, since it was a "no-fault" claim, they should reinstate his ncd. This was done via the Motor Insurers' Bureau.

His insurance company never told him about the MIB, we found that out from on here. The insurance company basically said, "As far as we are aware, there is no scheme, or institution who can help you."

Oh, and the uninsured kid?

Got done for no insurance and DWDCA.

TOTAL of 6 points and £155 in fines and Victim Surcharge, no costs.

I've seen folk get triple that for speeding

This country is fukced up.
Old 28 April 2011, 10:22 AM
  #33  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gpssti4
Should be 3 strikes and you're out - for both young drivers and new drivers. Three fault accidents in a year and the insurance company should refuse to insure you.

They virtually do: they would quote you £20,000 or so.

But how would that help? Those who drive uninsured would STILL drive uninsured.
Old 28 April 2011, 10:27 AM
  #34  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

And as for young drivers, how come OUR government can't put together a scheme like the Australians have, whereby EVERYONE in the country HAS to by third party insurance from them at the same time as they buy a tax disc, no insurance, no tax disc.

They pay around €200 each for it, no-one pays more.

And anyone who wants, or needs more than third party, goes to one of the insurance companies for it, to extend what they already have.

Driving uninsured is virtually non-existant, and could be here if OUR government REALLY cared about it.
Old 28 April 2011, 12:54 PM
  #35  
TylerDurden
Scooby Regular
 
TylerDurden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about people that buy a car to fix in their spare time?

Isnt it unreasonable for them to pay ££££ for a car they are not driving?
Old 28 April 2011, 01:02 PM
  #36  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

AFAIK, as it stands at present, if the vehicle is on your property, it needs neither MoT, nor tax, nor insurance?
Old 28 April 2011, 01:55 PM
  #37  
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: To the valley men!
Posts: 19,156
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by leecalcars
Where do you stand if the vehicle is sorn as im only using mine soley as a track car surley it dosnt need insuring...!

I thought with SORN it could not be driven on the public highway? Surely Tax and Insurance is required along with an MOT
Old 28 April 2011, 01:56 PM
  #38  
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: To the valley men!
Posts: 19,156
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I know SORN is valid on the way to an MOT but surely if you drive it to a track then that's different? Unless you have a trailer
Old 28 April 2011, 03:15 PM
  #39  
donny andi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
donny andi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
£4k for a reason though.

Insurers gave young drivers a chance for many years..... but they f**ked up (driving like ****). Now they have to pay for it unfortunately.

They had their chance.... they blew it.

What a load of bollox.......get a grip
If you wasn't in insurance you wouldn't chirp that crap

18 year old girl.....3k for a ford ka. Load of bollox , as usual we are hammered left right and centre and we bend over and take it
Old 28 April 2011, 06:25 PM
  #40  
hedgecutter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
hedgecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: far, far west
Posts: 3,731
Received 640 Likes on 466 Posts
Default

put the uninsured in the town stocks for a few hours, and provide rotten fruit. Flog them merclessly for a 2nd offence; charge spectators and put money in pot for those hit by uninsured. sorted.
Old 28 April 2011, 06:45 PM
  #41  
Arkynsei
Scooby Regular
 
Arkynsei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As much as I hate ***'eds for driving around uninsured.. I can sort of see why they do it, I believe I was fairly lucky to insure my 1.4 Seat Ibiza when I passed my test, total of £2000. Not too bad REALLY but still a lot. I've seen a lot of people in here complaining of 4 odd k's worth of insurance costs and frankly that's silly.

If it really is a minority spoiling it for the rest of it, that's incredibly sad. It is the minority racing around the streets at night in there souped up Saxo's, so why should sensible drivers who invest time, money and love into their car get shafted.

Phew.. weight off my chest a bit there :P
Old 28 April 2011, 08:36 PM
  #42  
scoobiesteve103
Scooby Regular
 
scoobiesteve103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: cornwall
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

partly because of uninsured drivers my own insurance has gone up £100 a yr for the last 2 yrs,ive not had any claims or anything so why punish me and others like me for it. insurance is a joke along with fuel so soon it will just be all uninsured drivers running around in sheds while us lot in scoobs will have to watch youtube vids to remind ourselves how much fun we could be having. alcazar is rite with the aussie rules,something we as a country should think about
Old 28 April 2011, 08:39 PM
  #43  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by donny andi
What a load of bollox.......get a grip
If you wasn't in insurance you wouldn't chirp that crap

18 year old girl.....3k for a ford ka. Load of bollox , as usual we are hammered left right and centre and we bend over and take it
I don't insure any 17/18 year olds, so my opinion isn't based on me trying to insure them.

You're obviously an expert though, so you must know about the costs involved in claims with young drivers.

Bollox? Get a grip? If the truth hurts then nothing i try to explain is going to get you to get your head out your **** is it?
Old 28 April 2011, 08:41 PM
  #44  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pramas
PS iam i right in thinking if hit by an uninsured driver the last insurance company to cover cars has to pay for it? my boss was hit by 1 last year and didnt get a bean
Yes, that's correct.

The insurers can then try to claim their costs back.
Old 28 April 2011, 09:00 PM
  #45  
Pramas
Scooby Regular
 
Pramas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
Yes, that's correct.

The insurers can then try to claim their costs back.
thought that was right, pays to go with a good insurance company as most wouldnt even mention anything about this possiblity.
If this was to happen does it effect ur no claims? Am insured by yourself if that makes any diff, guessing all companys are diff
Old 28 April 2011, 09:06 PM
  #46  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Doesn't effect you at all, aslong as your policy isn't covering that car still (ie you cancelled it or swapped it onto another car)
Old 28 April 2011, 09:07 PM
  #47  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gpssti4
Should be 3 strikes and you're out - for both young drivers and new drivers. Three fault accidents in a year and the insurance company should refuse to insure you.
Drivers will just 'go underground' if they can't drive legally i.e just drive anyway with no insurance, mot etc.

What is the answer to this? I dunno? Surely it is not ANPR on every corner though?
Old 28 April 2011, 09:11 PM
  #48  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
And as for young drivers, how come OUR government can't put together a scheme like the Australians have, whereby EVERYONE in the country HAS to by third party insurance from them at the same time as they buy a tax disc, no insurance, no tax disc.

They pay around €200 each for it, no-one pays more.

And anyone who wants, or needs more than third party, goes to one of the insurance companies for it, to extend what they already have.

Driving uninsured is virtually non-existant, and could be here if OUR government REALLY cared about it.
Australia have their fair share of illegal drivers, i.e people banned but who drive anyway. At the end of the day the court can only revoke your license or crush car so they drive anyway until their banger is confiscated then get a new one.

But yes it's got nothing like on the scale of Bradford with 50% illegal metal razzing about and all claiming whiplash.
Old 28 April 2011, 09:11 PM
  #49  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
What is the answer to this? I dunno?
Needs the law to be changed so they get a proper punishment.
ie banned for 6 months, and if you caught driving in those 6 months then you go inside. Would need bigger/more prisons though.
Old 28 April 2011, 09:13 PM
  #50  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
And as for young drivers, how come OUR government can't put together a scheme like the Australians have, whereby EVERYONE in the country HAS to by third party insurance from them at the same time as they buy a tax disc, no insurance, no tax disc.
Because the government would be the ones picking up the bills for the personal injury.... which is the cause of increased premiums at the moment.

(was a report on Watchdog about it this evening)
Old 28 April 2011, 09:15 PM
  #51  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arkynsei
If it really is a minority spoiling it for the rest of it, that's incredibly sad. It is the minority racing around the streets at night in there souped up Saxo's, so why should sensible drivers who invest time, money and love into their car get shafted.

Phew.. weight off my chest a bit there :P
Maybe the UK needs rules like under 25's can't drive turbos or something like that? But the main people who are to blame for the costly insurance are the people faking whiplash etc and the ambulance chasing lawyers.
Old 28 April 2011, 09:16 PM
  #52  
nick172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
nick172sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on sunny ibiza ocean beach
Posts: 5,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my daughter passed her test 12 months ago pass plus etc fiat punto 800 quider box in the car insurance first years insurance 1250 come to insure this year 3500 wtf 19 yrs old 1 years claims bonus nopoints anyway to cut a long story short got a multicar policy off admiral 11oo for daughters car and 200 for wifes monthly payment 160 for both
Old 28 April 2011, 09:21 PM
  #53  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
I don't insure any 17/18 year olds, so my opinion isn't based on me trying to insure them.

You're obviously an expert though, so you must know about the costs involved in claims with young drivers.

Bollox? Get a grip? If the truth hurts then nothing i try to explain is going to get you to get your head out your **** is it?
At 4k plus for a poxy 1 liter car to insure, id like to know who all these 17 18 year olds are that can afford that to get on the road and cause havoc pushing up the rates. Having a son myself who is 17 nearly 18 i know a lot of lads his age. Mine is the only one i know who has got his licence. Fat lot of good tho as he wont be driving at that price. I don't know any that drive let alone can afford 4k insurance? wish i knew who these lads are, could do with a sub from them rick boys
Old 28 April 2011, 09:25 PM
  #54  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I have no idea how they do it. I'd guess a lot of those cars belong to mum or dad, and the youngsters are insured as an 'occasional' driver.

I certainly wouldn't be able to afford to drive if i was 17 again. I paid £500 when i was a lad!!!
Old 28 April 2011, 09:32 PM
  #55  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
I have no idea how they do it. I'd guess a lot of those cars belong to mum or dad, and the youngsters are insured as an 'occasional' driver.

I certainly wouldn't be able to afford to drive if i was 17 again. I paid £500 when i was a lad!!!
I've tried everything to get my lad on the road. He is a good lad, never been in trouble, looking forward to going to uni in sept. I even tried to insure him in an old east german Trabant. 600cc of gutless eastern bloc crap that only did 70 mph from new. 0 to 60 in 21 secs from new. This motor was 22 years old so i doubt it will reach the blistering figures ive just quoted . No chance tho. tried classic insurance but they state over 25's only. If you could find a way even in a motor like this you would be mine and my boys hero.
Old 28 April 2011, 09:33 PM
  #56  
nick172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
nick172sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on sunny ibiza ocean beach
Posts: 5,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

in 1983 i insured a escort rs mexico 18 yrs old 600 quid lol i was only on 35.00 a week apprentice wage all my money paid the insurance nice car though wish id kept it id be loaded
Old 28 April 2011, 09:59 PM
  #57  
Pramas
Scooby Regular
 
Pramas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when i was 18 i had a cav sri, had to find a specialist company to insure that car and this was some 15yr ago or so, was still a bit pricey but if thats the kind of car u want, u have to pay for it
Old 29 April 2011, 12:37 AM
  #58  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pah ! Kids today are spoilt, not many driving 15 year old cars.

My first car was ! Mind you the insurance was a whopping £43...

Gotta luv' the 70's.

dunx
Old 29 April 2011, 12:47 AM
  #59  
Pramas
Scooby Regular
 
Pramas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

£43 what where u driving a trabant ! lol wished my 1st quote was that
Old 29 April 2011, 01:33 AM
  #60  
spally
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
spally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: family life is superb but i MISS my scoob!!
Posts: 9,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

someone has already posted this, but surely it is as simple as limiting the engine size of the car until x years have passed, just like they do with motor bikes. ok wont stop, not going to say youngsters, inexperienced drivers from crashing, but should decrease the size of the crash.

those that drive unisured are not going to be stopped by adding points to their licence etc, because they just dont give a dam anyway.

Like most things in life, it is those that play by the rules that pay for those that stick 2 fingers up to the law!!!!

hang them all!!!


Quick Reply: no Insurance you lose ya car



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:54 AM.