Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

WRX STI v WRX - Traffic light king?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 April 2011, 06:27 PM
  #241  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds very much like Andy lol. He's a very competitive soul, if it breaks he comes back bigger, stronger and better.
Old 25 April 2011, 07:08 PM
  #242  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jayallen
There isnt much difference in pre 96 classic imprezas, apart from WRX wagon with the TD04 and Type RA lower gear ratios. There would of only been 15ps between your 95WRX and your mates V2 STI. They share the same turbos, injectors, intercoolers, gear ratios and FD......It was only really the ecu's which were different.

He ran a 13.4 Compared to my 14.2 at the pod. Both launched pretty well too. We had three runs together and every time his car was about a second quicker. We even swapped cars for a run to make sure it wasn't down to driver. On the road his car was quite a bit quicker.
Also, STI deffinately used different intercoolers over the WRX. I remember comparing them. STI one sits differently, is larger and silver compared to black. STI also got quick shift box, same ratios but with alot less throw. I also thought the STI used a superior turbo to the WRX, might be wrong though.
Old 25 April 2011, 08:19 PM
  #243  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyB1983
He ran a 13.4 Compared to my 14.2 at the pod. Both launched pretty well too. We had three runs together and every time his car was about a second quicker. We even swapped cars for a run to make sure it wasn't down to driver. On the road his car was quite a bit quicker.
Also, STI deffinately used different intercoolers over the WRX. I remember comparing them. STI one sits differently, is larger and silver compared to black. STI also got quick shift box, same ratios but with alot less throw. I also thought the STI used a superior turbo to the WRX, might be wrong though.
It was silver yes but no better than the wrx core, the very very slight improvement(if any) came from the turbo/intercooler hose and both used TD05's and 380cc injectors....as said it was the ecu's that were different.
The early STI's were just rebranded WRX's, the Version 3 was the first proper STI.
Old 25 April 2011, 10:03 PM
  #244  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

From the research I have done, the first STI known as 'the STI version' differed quite significantly from the WRX.
It had a closed deck cylinder block, forged pistons, steel crankshaft, bigger valves, updated intercooler, bigger radiator and better turbo. Also came with Fujitsubo part stainless exhaust with wider bore, sodium filled manifold, free flowing larger silencers and a 3" wide tail pipe.
These are things the same year WRX didn't come with and I though the STI V2 carried some of these over.
I may well be wrong but this is just information I have read.
Old 25 April 2011, 10:47 PM
  #245  
ScottishRayman
Scooby Regular
 
ScottishRayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt

A legal 0-70 blast down the motorway slip road and my money might just go on a WRX.
shame im so far away , but anyways dont race for no money as car is too nice lol
Old 25 April 2011, 11:11 PM
  #246  
jsfb
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jsfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

9 pages of non sense. I owned an 05 WRX and now a 57 STI the STI will no doubt or marketing ploy about it annihilate the WRX all day long.
Old 25 April 2011, 11:14 PM
  #247  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the OP is lonely (typical WRX owner ), dragging this out for a long time ...

TX.
Old 25 April 2011, 11:27 PM
  #248  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Typical WRX owner,,
Trying to make himself believe his peasants model is as fast as the big boys model, lol.
Old 25 April 2011, 11:42 PM
  #249  
Japorter
Scooby Regular
 
Japorter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: OLD MY53 STi @ 341bhp/349lbft -> NOW Evo 8 385bhp/380lbft
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think WRX and STi is comparable!!!! WRX drivers really need to own a STi to understand Why,,,, Used to own a JDM V7 WRX then a V8 STi Type UK... STi is alot quicker if not miles better and better to drive in every way every gear every day so onnnnnnnnnn
Old 25 April 2011, 11:44 PM
  #250  
Japorter
Scooby Regular
 
Japorter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: OLD MY53 STi @ 341bhp/349lbft -> NOW Evo 8 385bhp/380lbft
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

or should I put it this way... who used to owner a WRX now an STi would ever think "Oh my old WRX is alot better???"
Old 26 April 2011, 12:21 AM
  #251  
GREGGYG
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
GREGGYG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Isleworth, MSOC
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just look at the Subaru brochures.....they state the facts and figures. Why would we want to debate anything which is available on paper, written by the people who designed the cars???

If the STi figures were bloated, several car mags would have picked that up during their own road tests of these cars.......but they didn't.
Old 26 April 2011, 12:43 AM
  #252  
Pramas
Scooby Regular
 
Pramas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GREGGYG
Just look at the Subaru brochures.....they state the facts and figures. Why would we want to debate anything which is available on paper, written by the people who designed the cars???

If the STi figures were bloated, several car mags would have picked that up during their own road tests of these cars.......but they didn't.
hit nail on the head, i used to own a hawk wrx and now iam on hawk sti no comparison

Last edited by Pramas; 26 April 2011 at 12:44 AM.
Old 26 April 2011, 01:58 AM
  #253  
B4D HK
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (15)
 
B4D HK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Club Chairman - West Mids Imprezas
Posts: 8,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

An Sti is a factory modded/tuned WRX

nuff said
Old 26 April 2011, 07:10 AM
  #254  
BlueBugEye
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
BlueBugEye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Littlehampton
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyB1983
Typical WRX owner,,
Trying to make himself believe his peasants model is as fast as the big boys model, lol.
Want to try your big boys model against my peasants model?
Old 26 April 2011, 07:32 AM
  #255  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueBugEye
Want to try your big boys model against my peasants model?
I will
Old 26 April 2011, 08:00 AM
  #256  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL 9 pages of nonsense.
Old 26 April 2011, 09:05 AM
  #257  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GREGGYG
Just look at the Subaru brochures.....they state the facts and figures. Why would we want to debate anything which is available on paper, written by the people who designed the cars???

If the STi figures were bloated, several car mags would have picked that up during their own road tests of these cars.......but they didn't.
Most agree PPP figures are extremely well off why not STI/WRX? MONEY TALKS MY FRIENDS.

Also huge car making giant Honda spewed massive amounts of garbage with the new Type R, the former smashes it in all respects.

Only one way to settle it if anyone local to each other has a standard blob WRX and STI, no point saying 'I had both, STI felt faster' as short ratio gears would make it feel faster.

Last edited by RS_Matt; 26 April 2011 at 09:08 AM.
Old 26 April 2011, 09:16 AM
  #258  
scooby2.5maz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WORCESTER
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by B4D HK
An Sti is a factory modded/tuned WRX

nuff said


yep !!!!!!!! totally agree !!!!
Old 26 April 2011, 09:18 AM
  #259  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OMG this is still going

The fact is all things being equal the standard STI will be quicker, not by that much, but it will be quicker. It won't 'destroy' the WRX or any of those other silly verbs people use as there just isn't enough difference between them in power/weight etc.

As someone on here said you need about another 100hp over a similarly weighted car to see an appreciable difference between two cars. Other than that all the other variables come into play... the driver, the gearing, road conditions, mechanical sympathy etc.

I owned a CTR and in the right circumstances could keep up with a standard WRX easy enough, but it all depended on those circumstances.

When people come on a forum like this and say things like 'my WRX leaves STIs for dead' it is clearly not logical as it is against the laws of physics. What they mean is that they met a few STIs on the road who were caught napping or didn't want to play etc.

Last edited by f1_fan; 26 April 2011 at 10:34 AM.
Old 26 April 2011, 09:59 AM
  #260  
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 26 April 2011, 10:08 AM
  #261  
richiewong
Twatful
 
richiewong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Grew up and don't drive Scoobs anymore!
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andythejock01wrx
Too bloody right, too many newbies on this place now FFS, "my ****'s bigger then yours!" Bullshit
Old 26 April 2011, 01:01 PM
  #262  
Allan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Allan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Most agree PPP figures are extremely well off
I'm not sure most agree wth that view, my PPP figures are bang on the money as are plently of others.
Old 26 April 2011, 01:18 PM
  #263  
Littleted
Scooby Regular
 
Littleted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Leeds
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

just outa intrest i did own a WRX-S and now own an STI, and although the STI is of course faster, the differance in feeling IE torq/ foot down smiles, theres not much Init, they were both standard running at 255 and 296 so 40bhp ish diff not really that much, also the WRX-S was lighter im told

Now as i went from an Astra VXR to the WRX-S the differance was exceptional, no lag full on power great.

1 thing that was diff and as you all know the WRX needs alot more doing to go anywhere, the STI has the nice bits on it so has more potential.

not many cars make me smile but this weekend on the twisties my STI did, i was shocked at how facking glued to the road it was and how fast it responded out of the bends, right up to the point where the wife called me a **** and told me to slow down.

even my 3 year old in the back said Slow down daddy , dont worry i was in control and was respecting the passengers
Old 26 April 2011, 01:33 PM
  #264  
stef_2010
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
stef_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cant believe this got to 9 pages ?

the boys clearly fishing !












or hes just stupid ?
Old 26 April 2011, 01:43 PM
  #265  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Allan
I'm not sure most agree wth that view, my PPP figures are bang on the money as are plently of others.
Had my standard PPP rolling roaded at 187whp (225bhp), not quite the quoted261 power with tons more torque than an STI. AET dyno'd it and said everything was smooth and by the numbers.

I read lots of accounts of WRX PPPs seeming a false dawn. I'm sure the blob STI PPP is far more lively though, to edge it away from the WRX.

I think too many have missed the point of the thread, it's not essentially "my car is an STI killing king bring on a 450bhp one" it's a "can a stock WRX actually keep up with a stock STI up to a given speed, away from the twisties and gravel etc???"

The fact my stock powered then lightly tuned WRX has wiped the floor with every STI I've come across makes me pose the question.
Old 26 April 2011, 01:45 PM
  #266  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
The fact my stock powered then lightly tuned WRX has wiped the floor with every STI I've come across makes me pose the question.
Were the STIs you 'mullered' parked up?
Old 26 April 2011, 01:46 PM
  #267  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stef_2010
Cant believe this got to 9 pages ?

the boys clearly fishing !












or hes just stupid ?
Quality contribution to the debate.
Old 26 April 2011, 01:49 PM
  #268  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Were the STIs you 'mullered' parked up?
They might as well have been! Probably picked a bit of krypton up in their radiators or 2 foot wide intercoolers.
Old 26 April 2011, 02:32 PM
  #269  
stef_2010
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
stef_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Quality contribution to the debate.
Its almost as quality as the orginal question
Old 26 April 2011, 02:37 PM
  #270  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stef_2010
Its almost as quality as the orginal question
What is a Subaru RS faster than a far more expensive Subaru GSR?


Quick Reply: WRX STI v WRX - Traffic light king?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 PM.