Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

4x4, rear wheel, front wheel drives ... my observations ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #61  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
That's is impressive, but the BDA was a great engine, although I never reved it that much, got similar power at the flywheel however. Sadly, I've long since been disinterested with engine building etc, too expensive even back then, and I don't have the time anymore.

If I had time and money, I'd like to convert a Land Rover 90 to V8 4 Sp auto, again. Maybe one day.
If I could afford it I would still be racing as a hobby, but the expense now has put it well out of reach. Too many organisations have jumped on the bandwagon. They used to make it cheaper so that you could do the work yourself and manage to produce a car, but you have to be pretty well off to do it now. A racing license which used to be about £12.50 now costs £300 as an example! An entry fee for a race used to be less than a fiver-anything up to £1000 or more now.

Les
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #62  
Devildog's Avatar
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 1
From: Away from this place
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
The "Pinto" was not "liberally" deployed in the 1.6L fleet, yes, it appeared in the "Capri", but not all Capri 1.6L, after all, it was a "performance" engine. Yes, the Pinto would slap valves, but the standard 1.6L was just a "small" 2.0L block fitted to Escorts, Cortinas, Capri's etc.

Second question, no.

Dude,

That's not all correct.

The pinto was an overhead cam (if i recall correctly?) and the majority of 1.6 Capri engines were a crossflow, "kent" ovehead valve pushrod engine with the camshaft in the block.

Certainly the earlier ones.

So not just a small 2.0L block with the same head

The ohv engines were interference engines, and the ohv engines were not IIRC

Last edited by Devildog; Jan 19, 2010 at 01:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 02:51 AM
  #63  
Klaatu's Avatar
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Dude,

That's not all correct.

The pinto was an overhead cam (if i recall correctly?) and the majority of 1.6 Capri engines were a crossflow, "kent" ovehead valve pushrod engine with the camshaft in the block.

Certainly the earlier ones.

So not just a small 2.0L block with the same head

The ohv engines were interference engines, and the ohv engines were not IIRC
Certainly the 1.6l engine installed in, say the Mk4 Cortina, was "cross flow" (And genuine cross flow was really only available on the twin cam head), OHV, OHC, not a Pinto and not interference. You certainly could lose your cam belt without valve/piston damage.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 03:46 AM
  #64  
Klaatu's Avatar
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
If I could afford it I would still be racing as a hobby, but the expense now has put it well out of reach. Too many organisations have jumped on the bandwagon. They used to make it cheaper so that you could do the work yourself and manage to produce a car, but you have to be pretty well off to do it now. A racing license which used to be about £12.50 now costs £300 as an example! An entry fee for a race used to be less than a fiver-anything up to £1000 or more now.

Les
Or a sponsor. But even in the cheaper days it was so difficult picking up a sponsor for simple stuff like fuel or tyres.

I'm just an armchair race driver these days.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:27 AM
  #65  
pacenote's Avatar
pacenote
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 11
From: The co-drivers seat
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
I agree with you about cam belts and timing chains. I never was that happy with a cambelt, particularly with my racing engines which were BDA's with high compression of course and full race cams with a lot of overlap. Out of interest I was getting 185 BHP out of a 1300cc at 11500 RPM normally aspirated. The exhaust had to be heard to be believed Not a lot of room between the pistons and the valves under normal circumstances for certain!

My BMW Mini Cooper has a proper timing chain and I am much happier about that.

Les
I had a timing chain break once, no damage to engine, mind you it was on a MK 2 Cortina GT (1600 crossflow)

1300 BD's are real screamers particularly in full race form. I have never run those only 2L BDG's ( In rally cars ), my current engine produced 256 BHP on the dyno at just over 8000 RPM (on carbs)
I have however seen 275 BHP on a similar engine but that was running fuel injection and a few more revs
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #66  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pacenote
I had a timing chain break once, no damage to engine, mind you it was on a MK 2 Cortina GT (1600 crossflow)

1300 BD's are real screamers particularly in full race form. I have never run those only 2L BDG's ( In rally cars ), my current engine produced 256 BHP on the dyno at just over 8000 RPM (on carbs)
I have however seen 275 BHP on a similar engine but that was running fuel injection and a few more revs
That is unusual, never seen a chain break yet. Your were lucky to escape damage anyway.

They are good engines-the 63 mm 1300 cc stroke just seems to suit them and one of the best engines I built was a 90mm bore and 63 mm stroker. It went really well until one of the cylinders came apart where it had been cracked, the bloke who sold me the block did not tell me about that! It was a block with big bore liners welded into it.

Happy days!

Les
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
34
Nov 7, 2024 04:10 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
Jan 11, 2021 03:08 PM
lloydsound
ScoobyNet General
9
Sep 14, 2015 05:34 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:01 PM.