The 'SCOTTISH' guy lost :(
03 July 2009, 10:36 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd have thought you'd have learnt after crying like a girl last week when SSU was giving you a thrashing and you got all over emotional spouting on several threads telling everyone how you'd been threatened via PM by someone, looking for sympathy.
Then when asked to reveal the PM you said 'Oh it was years ago'
What a grade A wet you are with the keyboard muscles of a super hero.
Then when asked to reveal the PM you said 'Oh it was years ago'
What a grade A wet you are with the keyboard muscles of a super hero.
03 July 2009, 10:38 PM
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex scooby less crew :(
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best man 1 today, pure and simple 
I like the way people say oh well "Murray's only 22". Nadal is "only 23" and has won 6 grandslam titles and Olympic gold......
I like the way people say oh well "Murray's only 22". Nadal is "only 23" and has won 6 grandslam titles and Olympic gold......
04 July 2009, 11:50 AM
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was sorry to see him lose. He could have won I believe but overall Roddick produced the better performance.
His serve was not constant enough although he did pull out a few real crackers. He earned the chances to win but whenever that came up he went on the defensive with his sliced returns etc. and you can't rely on a player of Roddick's stature to produce many unforced errors.
I think if he had kept up his attack it may well have been a different story.
Les
His serve was not constant enough although he did pull out a few real crackers. He earned the chances to win but whenever that came up he went on the defensive with his sliced returns etc. and you can't rely on a player of Roddick's stature to produce many unforced errors.
I think if he had kept up his attack it may well have been a different story.
Les
04 July 2009, 05:02 PM
#45
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what? Are you sying that makes Murray a better player? On those days he was, but overall I think you know who is better!
Indeed not, and Murray's ranking would suggest that he is a better player. No matter what you say, on the day, he was outclassed. He could beat Roddick a million times after this, but yesterday, he simply wasn't good enough.
I really don't see why that is so hard to understand. If you lose, you have been beaten, and that's because the other person was better (albeit on the day).
With hawkeye, there are no unlucky losers anymore.
Geezer
I really don't see why that is so hard to understand. If you lose, you have been beaten, and that's because the other person was better (albeit on the day).
With hawkeye, there are no unlucky losers anymore.
Geezer
04 July 2009, 06:14 PM
#46
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's all face it engerleesh folks, he's an ugly skirt wearing, haggis munchin useless jockanese waster 
Simple for ye all to digest then, eh?
Simple for ye all to digest then, eh?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
