Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

550 bhp on a sti newage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 07:49 PM
  #61  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

it,s like anything practice makes perfect
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #62  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

right what turbo will give me 400 turque on the standard 2.0 litre
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 06:21 PM
  #63  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

MD321H
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #64  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

cheers duncan
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 06:32 PM
  #65  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

A mildly tweaked 2.5 will make 400 ft.lb. and make a very nice road car....

I was out "playing" in a 2.5 Type-R last week and it was lovely, 300/360 but felt quicker than my bug with 395/360.... as it oversteered on demand.

HTH

dunx
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #66  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

dunx i would go for the 2.5 but all you here of is them blowing up the engine will be either a 2.1 stroker or just run the 2.0 litre with some forged pistons and rods with uprated clutch and a md321t in place of the h just incase of future mods etc.

Last edited by scoobzie; Jun 30, 2009 at 07:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #67  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

scoobzie,
Get a 2.5 that is built and prepared properly..... then it won't blow up!
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #68  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
scoobzie,
Get a 2.5 that is built and prepared properly..... then it won't blow up!
Absolutely.. run at 400/400 mine was barely know it is turning over.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #69  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

shaun i will speak to steve whitson m8 he is the one who will be doing the work and take it from there cheers
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #70  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

I run a 2.5ltr engine without any problems! If I was building another engine it would probably be a 2.33ltr not a 2.1ltr!
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 11:15 PM
  #71  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

steve why the 2.33 over the 2.5 can you give me more details on this thanx
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 11:18 PM
  #72  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

I would stick with a 2.5ltr, even if I was doing it again..... for what I use it for, road and track, it delivers.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 01:11 AM
  #73  
ScoobyDoo69's Avatar
ScoobyDoo69
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 3
From: WMI
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
As I have said to get a 10second car in a newage sti you need 600bhp and say £20k and that would be sourcing 2nd hand stuff and probs a very long time off the road! 500bhp could be done for a lot less and still be in standard turbo fitmnet. with 400bhp in a newage sti I would seriously think its a high 12 second 1/4 mile car so miles and miles from where you want to be. Also of your friend has a 400bhp car I take it yours is standard ??? Keep well away from the higher bhp figure as its not a toy
I think a 400bhp Newage should be closer to the 11's or at least low 12s.. I ran a few high 12s in my blobeye PPP the other weekend at the Pod..
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 07:39 AM
  #74  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
I run a 2.5ltr engine without any problems! If I was building another engine it would probably be a 2.33ltr not a 2.1ltr!
Having driven plenty of these on a daily basis, and as we are selling 2.1's like hot cakes I thought I would give my take on it.
For bolt on turbo users :
The 2.1 reponds very well on the road, obviously not as well as a 2.5, but so much better than the extra 100cc would suggest. On a like for like turbo basis though the 2.1 just pulls so much cleaner at the top end, and lets face it guys, if you wanna go drag racing what use is 600lbft at 3500rpm when you only drive through it once. This is what is helping my road car pull 11.1 1/4 miles @ 127+mph in full trim with a stock Sti5 gearbox and only 450hp.
Here are a couple of recent results for our 2.1 strokers, my own road car and K18LLR's with a measly 18g on 10% meth.




For rotated turbo users:
Use the biggest engine you can, lol. The larger rotated turbos flow so much better that you can use the larger engine to keep as much road useable torque as possible, but still have a car with good power at 7000rpm and beyond.

Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 08:54 AM
  #75  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
Here are a couple of recent results for our 2.1 strokers, my own road car and K18LLR's with a measly 18g on 10% meth.

Martyn,

By all means post K18LLR's graph to show a 2.1lt result, and whilst I know you did the engine build for K18LLAR, please don't claim it's one of your stroker engines, when it's using Lateral custom internals

And yes, the 2.1lt is a very underrated engine. We have several already running in the 10's, and with a little help, I think Morbs could see a high 9 second run........

Mark.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #76  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

i think with all this being explaned it will help the people on here like myself to understand were to go and what sort of build they need for what they want as most of the people on here read about engine builds and run a mile after they here money and time also the fact all the question,s on were to start so thanx guys for all the input on my thread
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #77  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by Lateral A
Martyn,

By all means post K18LLR's graph to show a 2.1lt result, and whilst I know you did the engine A for K18LLAR, please don't claim it's one of your stroker engines, when it's using Lateral custom internals

And yes, the 2.1lt is a very underrated engine. We have several already A in the 10's, and with a little help, I think Morbs could see a high 9 second run........

Mark.


Apologies Mark, lol.
Yes it has Lateral SUPPLIED Wiseco pistons and Crower rods, but all of the machining work, building and tuning was carried out by Enginetuner LTD.
I think that we can take some of the responsibility for the figures produced and I am sure the customer will agree .
And if you wish to put the graph on your site to highlight your components, feel free, lol.

P.S. Not a Lateral supplied component in sight on any of our other 2.1 strokers including my own .

Last edited by MartynJ; Jul 1, 2009 at 01:14 PM. Reason: P.S.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 11:54 AM
  #78  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Martyn,
What is the approximate costs to go forged with a 2.1, fitted and inc?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #79  
Jam Performance's Avatar
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

As mentioned all internals were supplied by Mark at Lateral - they are doing very well in my setup , however the full build inluding machining, mapping etc was done by EngineTuner so a joint contribution from both top Tuners within the Subaru world
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #80  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
Martyn,
What is the approximate costs to go forged with a 2.1, fitted and inc?
The options are endless, but in basic terms we will build a 2.1 stroker short motor for £2050 inc vat using the customers exisiting block, or drive in drive out full build inc Cosworth sump baffle, RCM oil pump, ARP head studs, heads fully overhauled for £4000 inc vat.
CDB blocks will require machining for the rear thrust which we carry out for £143.75 inc vat.
More details can be found here. https://www.scoobynet.com/trader-ann...ker-build.html

Martyn
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #81  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

mark can supply parts martynj can build the engine side sounds like a partnership that i would be willing to use
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #82  
Jam Performance's Avatar
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

They have done a excellent job on mine, the quality of the machine work/ honing etc is spot on, it hasn't lost a single drop of oil even though I have given it some serious abuse since I collected it, its very quiet on cold startup no slap, etc, I've seen many bodged builds over the past few years and this as well as many other cars built by them are simply flawless
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 07:18 PM
  #83  
scoobzie's Avatar
scoobzie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

cheers ki8llr i will call matynj and see what can be done
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #84  
Jam Performance's Avatar
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Make sure you go for the optional closed deck block option for future peace of mind, I can now literally bolt on a turbo of almost any size and know the engine will cope without any issues (providing my fuelling and drivetrain is up to it lol) the 18g is doing well for now and makes a cracking road car and is the perfect setup for someone on a budget
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #85  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Originally Posted by K18LLR
I can now literally bolt on a turbo of almost any size and know the engine will cope without any issues
That is some claim!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #86  
Jam Performance's Avatar
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
That is some claim!
lol obviously within reason, ran mine again on the dyno this time at evolve on the way back from rotorstock at santapod, it made the following figures

Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #87  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

NIce, I presume its a UK car as it has nothing after 7krpm
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #88  
Jam Performance's Avatar
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
NIce, I presume its a UK car as it has nothing after 7krpm
not at all the rev limiter is set at 8250rpm not too sure why it only shows up to 7k on the graph??
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 11:21 PM
  #89  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by K18LLR
not at all the rev limiter is set at 8250rpm not too sure why it only shows up to 7k on the graph??

Mine is a jap car with lots of head work yet I doubt mine would rev to 8250????? I'm sure mine bounce off the limiter at 8k ???
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 10:45 AM
  #90  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by K18LLR
not at all the rev limiter is set at 8250rpm not too sure why it only shows up to 7k on the graph??
Because the dyno operator has seen the point at which you make peak power and decided not to rev the engine right out for no reason.
It produces it's power nice and low due to the small turbo, stroker combination.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Car Parts For Sale
1
Nov 18, 2015 07:49 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 AM.