Latest results S206 turbo
#151
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We ran it again today after a group session and it pulled up 513 bhp with 490 lbs ft.
#153
Scooby Regular
#155
Scooby Regular
#156
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by MartynJ
Originally Posted by Lateral Performance
Realistically, I think it's going to be quite a challenge to get 90bhp from circa .5bar of boost !
Surely, on a turbo with a 500bhp-capable compressor, then c.90bhp from an added 0.5bar is entirely possible?!
After all, on my 350-capable TD05H 16g, I have gained 45bhp over the MY93 WRX's stock 237 (now at 282bhp)... And that is with only 0.5 to 0.3bar added to the std 0.8bar (peaks at 1.3/drops to 1.1). And this is on the power-sapping, crappy little TM, don't forget!
Or is my physics deeply flawed and simplistically naive, lol?
Last edited by joz8968; 26 September 2009 at 07:48 PM.
#157
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Martyn,
Yes, my car would be slower, as would all turbo cars losing .5bar of boost
However, Harryr34's question was how much boost he was going to have to run, to get 500bhp on his car, and 2 bar was suggested.
As I said, IMHO, 90bhp from circa .5bar, when it's ALREADY running 1.45 bar, & 10% methanol to get 412bhp, is going to be a challenge.
It would be interesting to see Mervil's graph, showing boost too.
IIRC, it's running 2 bar peak, I assume to achieve the 430ftlbs ? But Alan didn't say what the boost was dropping to, to achieve the 453bhp ?
Your 513bhp/502ftlb is a great result ! more boost, some methanol ?
#158
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let me get this straight this turbo bolts in existing position? And can run 450-500hp?
I think I will be in contact this week, is there a waiting list? Or are they held in stock?
This is like a dream come true for me ahahahaha
I think I will be in contact this week, is there a waiting list? Or are they held in stock?
This is like a dream come true for me ahahahaha
#159
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely, on a turbo with a 500bhp-capable compressor, then c.90bhp from an added 0.5bar is entirely possible?!
After all, on my 350-capable TD05H 16g, I have gained 45bhp over the stock 237 (now at 282bhp)... And that is with only an added 0.5 to 0.3bar added to std 0.8bar (peaks at 1.3/drops to 1.1). And this is on the power-sapping, crappy little TM, don't forget!
Or is my physics deeply flawed and simplistically naive, lol?
After all, on my 350-capable TD05H 16g, I have gained 45bhp over the stock 237 (now at 282bhp)... And that is with only an added 0.5 to 0.3bar added to std 0.8bar (peaks at 1.3/drops to 1.1). And this is on the power-sapping, crappy little TM, don't forget!
Or is my physics deeply flawed and simplistically naive, lol?
Generally, on a 2.0lt engine circa 10bhp per .1bar of boost is common on V Power, or similar. This will increase with better fuel, and engine size.
There will of course be exceptions, such as a change of component that improves the VE of the engine.
#161
Scooby Regular
Martyn,
Yes, my car would be slower, as would all turbo cars losing .5bar of boost
However, Harryr34's question was how much boost he was going to have to run, to get 500bhp on his car, and 2 bar was suggested.
As I said, IMHO, 90bhp from circa .5bar, when it's ALREADY running 1.45 bar, & 10% methanol to get 412bhp, is going to be a challenge.
Yes, my car would be slower, as would all turbo cars losing .5bar of boost
However, Harryr34's question was how much boost he was going to have to run, to get 500bhp on his car, and 2 bar was suggested.
As I said, IMHO, 90bhp from circa .5bar, when it's ALREADY running 1.45 bar, & 10% methanol to get 412bhp, is going to be a challenge.
A nice cold intercooler and a stone cold gearbox, lol, go figure.
#163
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Martyn's car is a 2.1 stroker. It uses standard V5 heads and cams and an S206 turbo mapped using Simtek. And that's about it as far as power is concerned. I think the 11.1/127 mph quarters from an absolutely fully trimmed car speaks for itself.
#164
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#168
Scooby Regular
2mov.flv video by BonnieAmber - Photobucket
Still in true full trim including spare wheel, lol.
I am sure you will get there, although it doesn't suprise me to hear that it goes well even now.
#170
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In all honesty, I don't think there's going to be that much in it if everything is fully worked out. We expect to see more torque from the 2.1 and better spool, that's obvious, but I'd say a well sorted 2 litre would make 500 bhp from this turbo.
#171
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just been testing a 2.5 fitted with the S206. Running a splash of meth with V power. Peak 1.85 bar holding 1.6 bar.
Torque..
3000 rpm = 290 lbs ft.
3500 rpm = 450 lbs ft.
3900 rpm = 580 lbs ft.
Over 400 lbs ft from 3400 rpm to 6000 rpm.
Torque..
3000 rpm = 290 lbs ft.
3500 rpm = 450 lbs ft.
3900 rpm = 580 lbs ft.
Over 400 lbs ft from 3400 rpm to 6000 rpm.
#174
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alan,
Is 580ftlbs @ 3900rpm /1.85bar a typo, or, just how big a "splash", are we talking ?
3500rpm = 450ftlbs (1.44cfm/bhp) is about what would be expected.
3900rpm = 580ftlbs @ 1.85bar (1.1cfm/bhp) is a massive jump in VE, and some what unheard of on a Subaru.
Mark.
#175
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alan,
Is 580ftlbs @ 3900rpm /1.85bar a typo, or, just how big a "splash", are we talking ?
3500rpm = 450ftlbs (1.44cfm/bhp) is about what would be expected.
3900rpm = 580ftlbs @ 1.85bar (1.1cfm/bhp) is a massive jump in VE, and some what unheard of on a Subaru.
Mark.
Is 580ftlbs @ 3900rpm /1.85bar a typo, or, just how big a "splash", are we talking ?
3500rpm = 450ftlbs (1.44cfm/bhp) is about what would be expected.
3900rpm = 580ftlbs @ 1.85bar (1.1cfm/bhp) is a massive jump in VE, and some what unheard of on a Subaru.
Mark.
Whatever comment you'd get from passengers, "laggy" isn't one of them! it's more like "holy ----"
We have been saying there is a lot of potential in these turbos, and we are far from finished working on them, with four more various installs in the pipeline.
Of course you're more than welcome to pop down and take a look at what we're up to any time you like.
#179