Traffic Cops Beeb1
Scooby Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
From: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
LOL - nice input from someone who didn't see it!
The fact it cleared a 10 foot fence without even touching it.......and then landing on the roof some 10 meters away from the fence!
The fact it cleared a 10 foot fence without even touching it.......and then landing on the roof some 10 meters away from the fence!
Last edited by davyboy; May 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
From: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!

As usual with me, bull in a china shop!
So a kid in a Nova sees me round a sharp bend at below the speed limit. He fails to make the bend.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: 'Nuneaton' - Home of The Stealth Scoob
I guess what the programme did show was that you can get in an awful mess by putting your foot down.
One thing it did do for me was made me think even more about having a safe blast around the twisties, you never know whats around the corner..
One thing it did do for me was made me think even more about having a safe blast around the twisties, you never know whats around the corner..
So a kid in a Nova sees me round a sharp bend at below the speed limit. He fails to make the bend.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
If the bmw driver was completely blameless, and hadn't been committing some offence, then why make an anonymous call, and then lie to the police later, why not ring for help just saying you'd witnessed an accident? I can't see any reason to cover things up, if you have done nothing wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
Jun 18, 2016 03:48 PM
Hos
ScoobyNet General
1
Sep 8, 2000 08:01 AM





