Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Crank/big end problems - options?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #31  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Yes I've fettled the clutch release arm myself a few times when mysteriously the end cap had disappeared off the pivot rod and it was just sliding back and forth making for a weird clutch action. While I was down there I made up a braided clutch hose to the slave cylinder, it made a huge difference to the clutch feel.

I've got a workshop manual already. So, take out the pivot pin, then just pull the arm straight up and out? I bet putting it all back in again is harder than taking it out LOL. I've even just been and 'sourced' an old pallet to put stuff on rather than leaving it all over the garage floor.

I think I've decided on the DIY build. Nothing ventured nothing gained eh? Now this is what I'm chewing over at the moment - anything that stands out as odd, bearing in mind I'm saving as much money as I can:
  • Re-use existing EJ20 block, already overbored .5mm as far as I know only 15k miles ago so should be still OK? £0
  • Replace ALL mains and big ends as a matter of course? £150
  • Second hand good crank obtained locally £150
  • New steel rods and forged pistons from US (I don't necessarily need or want to rev it, but I do want to be able to cane it flat out in 5th at 6500 revs without having to worry about another engine build!) £400
  • Rebuild existing oil pump (what exactly is the 'mod' that people pay £150+ for?)
  • Replace heads for v3/4 STi or ported WRX to make good power without needing high revs? £400
  • Paint existing inlet manifold WHITE!
How come a gasket set costs £300? What's included?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #32  
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

I think you are about right with what you have mentioned.

The oil pump usually have new gears to uprate them.

The STI heads I think have better valves and bucket shims which allows higher revving. I don't think the design is much different to the WRX heads but don't know that for sure.

I would consider having your own crank checked before buying a new/second hand one. You need to know 2 things 1) If it is indeed ok without needing regrinding (just needs new shells) 2) That it wasn't reground last time by the crooks you mention as this could be the reason for the failure in the first place.

Also, new rods and pistons are obviously a good idea but do you need to go to that expense. I would say from what has been advised on here that at and around 350hp the standard stuff shouldn't be a problem. Thats again depends on if there is any damage to either.

Wayne.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #33  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,066
Likes: 85
From: N/A
Default

Right then mate,
I honestly think if you're going to the cost of rods pistons and a new crank you'd be better sourcing a 2.5. Infact I may just be able o get my hands on a one for you. I heard today of a warranty replacement unit that wasn't needed as it turned out to be a tensioner not a bottom end.

I reckon that could be had for about £750. This is how I came about mine but I've just sold it on.

Infact mate if you like drop me a PM I'd be happy to discuss options in detail.

Incedently the oil pump that everyone refers to is the RCMS item which has an uprated pressure relief valve. The OE ones are prone to sticking. Again Its advised to bin your old pump and buy a new one.

Cheers

Daz

Last edited by dazdavies; Apr 5, 2008 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #34  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

OK well now we're getting to the nitty gritty and if I haven't said so already, many thanks to all of you contributing on this thread - it's much appreciated.

The thing I want to be able to do, even if my target is only 300-350bhp is to have it totally safe. Hence my thoughts on at least dropping some US-bought forged pistons into it to cope with anything - most likely cause of stress will be flat out high speed runs on track or on the autobahn. Revving is not something I need so much, it just doesn't feel right in a turbo somehow to have it running at even 7000 let alone 8000 rpm. In my old Clio 16v that would sit at 7500 rpm all day long and it was unbreakable. There's something about the Subaru lump that I just don't trust.

So now, what's to be done...Wayne says go cheap and reuse as much as poss, Daz says go 2.5... decisions decisions!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #35  
MY,k436suy's Avatar
MY,k436suy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia, In a barn,where i was born.
Default

2.5! you know you want to
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 08:01 PM
  #36  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,066
Likes: 85
From: N/A
Default

Been there done both. I built a forged 2.0L (which is still going strong). Then I went the 2.5 route. Best thing I have ever done. MY 2.5 bottom end was completely standard. I ran it at 452 bhp for 7000 miles!!! Because I got it for reasonable money I bought it before i sold the forged 2.0L as I wanted to see what all the fuss was about. I had a spare closed deck 2.0L block that I was always going to use one way or another.

Because of the test I did with the 2.5 I have just yesterday paid £1000 to have my 2.0L closed deck block bored and sleeved to 2.5 As the 2.5's are that good!!

I can assure you that the 2.5 is the most viable and most rewarding option here it' also the most cost effective. The standard block will take 400/400 all day long!!!
Also forget all this rubbish bout the 2.5 not wanting to rev it's utter nonsense.

You should be able to do this conversion for well under £2k. That includes engine purchase, gaskets, oils and remapping and maybe a few uprades too.

Remember, this is all based on my actual experience gained from building my own engines and running them on my own car.

Cheers
Daz
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #37  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

OK let's say I went for a 2.5 conversion (I am tempted if it can be had cheaper), what kind of power/torque could I expect from my current supporting mods:
ECU: v4 Apexi Power FC
FUEL: Walbro pump, SARD adjustable FPR, 440cc injectors, parallel mod
INTAKE: K&N induction cone, Samco inlet hose, TD05-16G turbo, Autobahn FMIC, mildly ported TB & manifold with insulating spacers
EXHAUST: Wrapped Harvey headers and up-pipe, wrapped GGR sports cat downpipe, straight through centre and WR Sport backbox
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:24 PM
  #38  
maps's Avatar
maps
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: isle of wight
Default

i was thinking of going 2.5 on my p1, but im thinking now is it worth it, 400bhp would be as much as i'd wont, so thinking of my gearbox a new STI9 short block seem to be the way im thinking now

costs im looking at if i went 2.5

2.5 short block £1095+vat or £1495+vat with CP pistons
new clutch £300
gaskets and seals £250ish
oil modline £100
water pump £50
head bolts £150
oil pump £150
cam belt £60
remap £600
price fitted drive in, out £600

thats £4010 with forged pistons, then i'd be thinking as my car is standard, before remap i'd better decat, filter ect ect ect lol

mark
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 11:12 PM
  #39  
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Originally Posted by silent running
OK well now we're getting to the nitty gritty and if I haven't said so already, many thanks to all of you contributing on this thread - it's much appreciated.

The thing I want to be able to do, even if my target is only 300-350bhp is to have it totally safe. Hence my thoughts on at least dropping some US-bought forged pistons into it to cope with anything - most likely cause of stress will be flat out high speed runs on track or on the autobahn. Revving is not something I need so much, it just doesn't feel right in a turbo somehow to have it running at even 7000 let alone 8000 rpm. In my old Clio 16v that would sit at 7500 rpm all day long and it was unbreakable. There's something about the Subaru lump that I just don't trust.

So now, what's to be done...Wayne says go cheap and reuse as much as poss, Daz says go 2.5... decisions decisions!
Are you saying I'm cheap??!!!???!!! LOL!

I'm defo looking at the 2.5 myself but IF I wanted to save money and not spend a fortune then I would do the cheap option. Remember though that the cheap option if done correctly with everything thoroughly checked out should do what you are asking.

Although, the more I read up on the 2.5's I would still go the 2.5 route as it seems to be alot easier to achieve decent power and reliability.

Wayne.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #40  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

That's quite a shopping list Mark. You're right it's all the little bits like head bolts and water pump that all add up.

Wayne I think you're right to recommend the 2.0 rebuild, but like you, the more I read about the 2.5, the more it seems to suit what I want - an engine that will make an easy 320-350 with similar torque and not need caning to achieve it. I don't really want to go beyond this as I like my API drivetrain and they only just built it for me last year!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 12:13 AM
  #41  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,066
Likes: 85
From: N/A
Default

an STI 9 short block is going to be around the same money as the 2.5 short block.
It's a fairly simple decision to make. Having done it myself you'll be amazed at the low down grunt of a 2.5 but also how civilised it is to drive.
Its simply a better engine. Mine also saw 7500 rpm on numerous occasions the 2.5's dont revs rubbish is just a myth or a consequence of a badly put together package.

Last edited by dazdavies; Apr 6, 2008 at 12:17 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #42  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Well now I'm thinking about lifting points for the engine, already have inlet manifold off so I can see what I'm doing, I can't see any lifting eyes on the top of the block - am I missing something? And I've decided I'll take pictures as I go, is this worth sticking up on Projects or is it too basic to bother with I wonder?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #43  
stoneface's Avatar
stoneface
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
From: cornwall
Default

Normal place to lift from is inlet manifold, there are no lifting eyes on block.
Just loop a rope around underneath each side of engine and lift from these.
Yeah get some pics up mate!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #44  
maps's Avatar
maps
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: isle of wight
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
an STI 9 short block is going to be around the same money as the 2.5 short block.
It's a fairly simple decision to make. Having done it myself you'll be amazed at the low down grunt of a 2.5 but also how civilised it is to drive.
Its simply a better engine. Mine also saw 7500 rpm on numerous occasions the 2.5's dont revs rubbish is just a myth or a consequence of a badly put together package.
how would a 2.5 with say 360/380 feel against a 2.0 with 360bhp, do you loose that kick with the 2.5, that you would get with the 2.0

also is it really worth going for forged pistons in a 2.5 if your happy staying around the 360-380bhp mark

mark
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 11:47 AM
  #45  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Excellent questions Mark and just what I have had at the back of my mind but didn't get round to asking ^^^^

Stoneface - problem is I've took the manifold off already. I just tend to do that to keep everything tidy and out of the way. Done it so many times, it's half an hour's work now.

My mate who's bringing the crane has got some chain as well, so I'll just loop it round like you say. I'll start a project thread as well.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #46  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,066
Likes: 85
From: N/A
Default

Mine was equally as punchy as the 2 litre was if not more. You'll feel a massive difference where you use the car most from 2500 - 6000 rpm It just pulls so much better with the 2.5
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #47  
DJ_Jon's Avatar
DJ_Jon
911 C4 pilot
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
From: In an Air Cooled Porsche
Default

mine has just developed the no 4 death rattle.. very interesting thread chaps
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
Dec 1, 2015 09:37 AM
PetrolHeadKid
Driving Dynamics
10
Oct 5, 2015 05:19 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
dantiel
General Technical
8
Sep 29, 2015 11:33 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 AM.