Lets see how fast your CPU is.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Aug 29, 2011 | 08:24 PM

#151

CREWJ

Scooby Regular

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 5,365

Likes: 1

From: Aberdare / Daventry

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigsinky

12 seconds on an unclocked machine is good my friend, faster than 90% of most machines out there. don't risk ballsing something up just to show us how big your **** is.

I just want to see if I can get down to 5s

Aug 29, 2011 | 09:47 PM

#152

bigsinky

Scooby Regular

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 19,408

Likes: 0

From: Sunny BELFAST

Quote:

Originally Posted by CREWJ

I just want to see if I can get down to 5s

not a chance unless you are an uber geek

Aug 29, 2011 | 11:00 PM

#153

TonyBurns

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 25,565

Likes: 2

From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by topdog

Thanks for the comments guys
Overclocking is a hobby of mine, I'm currently ranked third in the UK
Cooling was with a Single Stage cooler which means the CPU was running at around -40

The base clock is pushed so that the ram frequencies are higher, I could run it at 100 X 56 but that would be boring

Voltage at 1.6v is fine if it's cool enough

http://www.hwbot.org/user/topdog/

Some pics

Here's my MSI lightning GTX 580 under LN2

A PCMark05 run with a donor board powering extra irams

WOW, thats one hell of a setup

would love to run a liquid nitrogen cooled system, have to stick with air and keep it fairly standard (for now, I feel 4.6/4.8 may suffice for a little while when I get playing around

)

Tony

Aug 30, 2011 | 12:33 AM

#154

ALi-B

Moderator

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 38,078

Likes: 310

From: The hell where youth and laughter go

You lot do realise that ancient version of super pi only stresses one core.

So on a quad core, one core is being used whilst the other three are sat there scratching their *****!

Aug 30, 2011 | 12:47 AM

#155

ALi-B

Moderator

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 38,078

Likes: 310

From: The hell where youth and laughter go

Oh yes:

13.332 seconds on a Q9550

Aug 30, 2011 | 08:38 AM

#156

bigsinky

Scooby Regular

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 19,408

Likes: 0

From: Sunny BELFAST

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALi-B

You lot do realise that ancient version of super pi only stresses one core.

So on a quad core, one core is being used whilst the other three are sat there scratching their *****!

yes. change to hyper pi for multi threaded

Aug 30, 2011 | 10:00 AM

#157

jura11

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Apr 2010

Posts: 10,523

Likes: 1

Guys who tried y-cruncher?

http://www.numberworld.org/y-cruncher/#Features

Jura

Aug 30, 2011 | 10:16 AM

#158

An0n0m0us

Scooby Regular

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,600

Likes: 29

From: UK

With SuperPI I got 13 seconds, with Hyper PI running 8 threads I got 22 seconds

Aug 30, 2011 | 04:05 PM

#159

Ian

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 7,845

Likes: 1

From: Cambridge

I have just tried it and got 16 seconds

E8400 at 3 GHz
4 GB ram
windows 7
8800GTX card

EDIT to say.
this was my old system and it done it in 15 seconds, so how come it takes a second longer, but I have more and faster ram, and a faster graphics card??

15 sec
E8400
2 gig ram
500w power
it x1900xt card

not to bad i think

Last edited by Ian; Aug 30, 2011 at 04:08 PM.

Aug 30, 2011 | 04:28 PM

#160

CREWJ

Scooby Regular

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 5,365

Likes: 1

From: Aberdare / Daventry

It's all to do with the processor unless you are using a computational graphics card.

Aug 30, 2011 | 05:51 PM

#161

Ian

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 7,845

Likes: 1

From: Cambridge

im using the same processor

Jan 30, 2012 | 04:45 PM

#162

Evolution Stu

Administrator

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 4,464

Likes: 0

From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.

Upgrading my PC tonight, will be back with an update later.

Jan 30, 2012 | 05:29 PM

#163

albob

Scooby Regular

Joined: May 2000

Posts: 3,239

Likes: 67

===== Holy Thread Resurrection !!!! =====

I did this and got 22 secs (athlon Phenom 2 x4 955) ; read some the results, and thought - "dats good!" ---- then I saw the DATE !!!! === 2008 !!!

Jan 30, 2012 | 05:59 PM

#164

bigsinky

Scooby Regular

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 19,408

Likes: 0

From: Sunny BELFAST

there are some more recent results though. 10 seconds for 1M is pretty good going

Jan 30, 2012 | 06:17 PM

#165

winston69

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (30)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 3,422

Likes: 0

From: Cuddington, Nr Northwich

Jan 30, 2012 | 07:16 PM

#166

dresser

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 152

Likes: 0

I7 990x Extreme edition 9 sec

Dont know how to attach screen print.

Jan 30, 2012 | 08:19 PM

#167

bioforger

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 16,995

Likes: 5

From: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te

Chillblast Core i5 2500k oc'd on air to 4.6ghz, 8 secs

Last edited by bioforger; Jan 30, 2012 at 08:56 PM.

Jan 30, 2012 | 09:39 PM

#168

Evolution Stu

Administrator

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 4,464

Likes: 0

From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.

7.98 seconds.
i7 2600, Overclocked on air to 4.7ghz.

Jan 30, 2012 | 09:50 PM

#169

bioforger

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 16,995

Likes: 5

From: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te

dam u stu beaten by .02 of sec

Mind you mind is an i5 not an i7

Jan 30, 2012 | 10:32 PM

#170

Evolution Stu

Administrator

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 4,464

Likes: 0

From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bioforger

dam u stu beaten by .02 of sec

Mind you mind is an i5 not an i7

Very impressed by yours mate, great work overclocking that to those figures!

Not finished with mine yet, only just built it and thats using Asus cool new overclock software, will try manually later in teh week, but tonight I cant get my new Radeon 7970 to bloody work. Graphics are all corrupt in 3D Mark 11. ****ing thing!