Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: Would you report an illegal immigrant?
Yes, damn right I would, we've enough here already.
138
95.83%
No, I say live and let live.
6
4.17%
Voters: 144. You may not vote on this poll

would you report an illegal immigrant?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 January 2008, 01:54 PM
  #241  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

To accept JC is the son of God and our saviour, requires thought about religion and faith, therefore, making a person Christian when they accept this. I firmly believe, while this is the basic requirement of Christianity, following a lifestyle in line with this is needed to be truely Christian.

I think what makes me feel this is no longer a Christian country is many people do not follow that way of life. Many would not give a great deal of time to thinking about whether Jesus is their saviour, and just get on with day to day life, religion rarely being factored in to it. Yet, when asked what religious group they fall into, unless they say none, many people would be inclined to say Christianity, because perhaps their parents were, or because they celebrate Christmas etc. It is not because they necessarily are Christian or even give it any thought, but it is the closest group they would say they fell into.
Old 29 January 2008, 01:59 PM
  #242  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
If you want to know if somebody considers christ to be their saviour, who is the best person to ask? The person in question?
Not not sure whether we are agreeing or not now?

My feel for this is, if you ask people in this country is JC our saviour they tend to recoil. Ask the same question is parts of the US for example you'd get a very different response, hence their high church attendance
Old 29 January 2008, 01:59 PM
  #243  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
My take on this would be that a child is not inherently aetheist, but instead inherently agnostic - you could equally argue though that infact both are choices so neither apply
What do you mean instead, it's not either or. Agnosticism isn't the middle ground on a linear transition from theism to atheism, it's orthogonal.

Theism is a positive belief, you have to believe in a god or gods. Atheism just requires that you don't believe in a god, no matter what the reason, choice, ignorance, or anything else. There are lots of things I haven't even considered because I don't know anything about them and I don't believe in those either.
Old 29 January 2008, 02:02 PM
  #244  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default would you report an illegal immigrant?

looks at thread title again. Seems we have gone a touch off piste, oops! Sorry!

FWIW, if you have reasonable grounds to believe that she is genuinely illegal, I'd make a phone call and make my concerns known, being clear you may be wrong. Otherwise, leave it alone.
Old 29 January 2008, 02:02 PM
  #245  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FFS any chance you girls can get back on topic - or maybe start a thread or revieve on of the many, many religious threads already covered.

agree to disagree or something
Old 29 January 2008, 02:07 PM
  #246  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
FFS any chance you girls can get back on topic - or maybe start a thread or revieve on of the many, many religious threads already covered.

agree to disagree or something
Or just turn to Tom Cruise:

ONLY he can save you......

Well, according to that Scientology video!
Old 29 January 2008, 02:07 PM
  #247  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
What do you mean instead, it's not either or. Agnosticism isn't the middle ground on a linear transition from theism to atheism, it's orthogonal.

Theism is a positive belief, you have to believe in a god or gods. Atheism just requires that you don't believe in a god, no matter what the reason, choice, ignorance, or anything else. There are lots of things I haven't even considered because I don't know anything about them and I don't believe in those either.
Basically Atheism is a philisophical view, so we are into a debate as to whether a child is capable of a philisophical view about religion/god/spirituality.

I've attached a definition which hopefully clears things up

Atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Old 29 January 2008, 02:07 PM
  #248  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Not not sure whether we are agreeing or not now?

My feel for this is, if you ask people in this country is JC our saviour they tend to recoil. Ask the same question is parts of the US for example you'd get a very different response, hence their high church attendance
We seem to have derailed this thread somewhat.

I gave my very basic definition of a Christian, is it everybody's? I doubt it. What I'm getting at is that the best person to determin a person beliefs / faith is that person and they may have a different definition to me. As is my way, my definition is rather abrupt and yes you may get a shocked response if you asked that question directly, but if you asked:

Do you consider yourself to be a Christian
Do you believe God sent his only son JC to earth for the salvation of man kind
Do you believe in JC
Do you believe you will go to heaven through your belief in JC

I suspect you'd get Yes or sort of to most of those question when asking one of our self defined 70%. It boils down to much the same definition, just delivered in a more fluffy way.
Old 29 January 2008, 02:11 PM
  #249  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Basically Atheism is a philisophical view, so we are into a debate as to whether a child is capable of a philisophical view about religion/god/spirituality.

I've attached a definition which hopefully clears things up

Atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From your link
An implicit atheist has not thought about belief in gods; such an individual would be described as implicitly without a belief in gods
So that would cover most young children that have not been introduced to the concept of a god then?
Old 29 January 2008, 02:12 PM
  #250  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
FFS any chance you girls can get back on topic - or maybe start a thread or revieve on of the many, many religious threads already covered.

agree to disagree or something

You're right, easily done though!

Back on topic..... why did I get infracted on this thread?
Old 29 January 2008, 02:18 PM
  #251  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
From your link


So that would cover most young children that have not been introduced to the concept of a god then?
Well I posted the whole lot up so as not to be selective, the primary definition is a 'philosophical view'. Implied aetheism is a new one on me I'm afraid.
Old 29 January 2008, 02:21 PM
  #252  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Well I posted the whole lot up so as not to be selective, the primary definition is a 'philosophical view'. Implied aetheism is a new one on me I'm afraid.
LEAVE IT!

you got infracted, must have bin an aethiest or an agnostic, or a muslim, or a jew or bhuddist or a.......

I blame religion or a lack of it in some cases
Old 29 January 2008, 02:32 PM
  #253  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Well I posted the whole lot up so as not to be selective, the primary definition is a 'philosophical view'. Implied aetheism is a new one on me I'm afraid.
Well maybe you should read the article you refer to, you may find it interesting reading, in particular this section where the very point we are discussing is covered.

As far back as 1772, d'Holbach said that "All children are born Atheists; they have no idea of God".[27] Similarly, George H. Smith (1979) suggested that: "The man who is unacquainted with theism is an atheist because he does not believe in a god
Old 29 January 2008, 03:53 PM
  #254  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
Well maybe you should read the article you refer to, you may find it interesting reading, in particular this section where the very point we are discussing is covered.
Well that very section you have highlight is all contention and doesn't set out to be definitive or fact, and is a sub section of the article as whole which is headed by the definition 'Aetheism is a philisophical view'.

I think you need to be less selective.

But I take the point there are some that hold that view, which I didn't know before we had this discussion.
Old 29 January 2008, 04:17 PM
  #255  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Well that very section you have highlight is all contention and doesn't set out to be definitive or fact,
Philosophy isn't a mathematical science, what are you expecting? They've observed, hypothesised and developed a theory, a falsifiable one at that. All you need to do to show he is wrong is find a child who knows about god(s) before they have been told about them by somebody else.

and is a sub section of the article as whole which is headed by the definition 'Aetheism is a philisophical view'.
The whole article is Titled "Atheism". The implicit atheism is sub-heading of "Definitions and distinctions " The bit you are referring to is the first definition of Atheism, not the title. And it's "Atheism , as a philisophical view," Note the AS not IS and the comma.

That first definition, to me, just reads "Atheism, from a dispassionate perspective,..." which is what considering something philosophically means.

It doesn't say "Atheism is a philosophy" which seems to be what you're reading it as. I do agree that Atheism is something that is discussed at length by Philosophers, but that in itself doesn't make it a belief system or a philosophy.

I think you need to be less selective.
The irony!

But I take the point there are some that hold that view, which I didn't know before we had this discussion.
Well that's progress!
Old 29 January 2008, 04:40 PM
  #256  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
Philosophy isn't a mathematical science, what are you expecting? They've observed, hypothesised and developed a theory, a falsifiable one at that. All you need to do to show he is wrong is find a child who knows about god(s) before they have been told about them by somebody else.



The whole article is Titled "Atheism". The implicit atheism is sub-heading of "Definitions and distinctions " The bit you are referring to is the first definition of Atheism, not the title. And it's "Atheism , as a philisophical view," Note the AS not IS and the comma.

That first definition, to me, just reads "Atheism, from a dispassionate perspective,..." which is what considering something philosophically means.

It doesn't say "Atheism is a philosophy" which seems to be what you're reading it as. I do agree that Atheism is something that is discussed at length by Philosophers, but that in itself doesn't make it a belief system or a philosophy.



The irony!



Well that's progress!
I think you are right I was reading the article a bit too literally, and I guess I've always felt that non-believing was a choice, not an absense of knowledge (which I still do). I guess it proves we're not the only folks to have had this discussion. But this has been a very interesting discussion and I think I'm a bit more in the middle of the road on the whole aetheist versus agnostic bit now, so cheers.

Until next time
Old 29 January 2008, 04:57 PM
  #257  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I think you are right I was reading the article a bit too literally, and I guess I've always felt that non-believing was a choice, not an absense of knowledge (which I still do).
That's very big of you!

It's certainly a choice once you know there are choices to make.

I guess it proves we're not the only folks to have had this discussion.
Indeed, it's dicussed in some form or another quite freqently on the JREF forums.

But this has been a very interesting discussion and I think I'm a bit more in the middle of the road on the whole aetheist versus agnostic bit now, so cheers.

Until next time
Welcome, I look forward to it.
Old 29 January 2008, 11:16 PM
  #258  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SetoN
Ive seen you write some rubbish Martin, but this is complete and utter tosh.

You dont have to go to church or even pray to be a christian. You just have to believe in god and celebrate that in some way. That be can be done by celebrating his sons birth at Christmas or maybe his resurrection at Easter. By taking part in any of these you are taking part in the christian way of life.

You only have to look at the schools to see that we are still as a country trying to practice chirstianity singing carols and doing nativity plays. As you get older you forget this as we dont see it as much in our daily lives.
Of course, December the 25th wasn't "his" birthday and "Christmas" celebration on thsi day has origins in paganism. January the 7th is "his" birthday.

Easter is the celebration of the goddes of spring, Eostre, again a Pagan festival hijacked by Christianity.
Old 29 January 2008, 11:24 PM
  #259  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flashgordon666
i know a lot of people who work for immigration, they say its easy to get in this country, they said immigrates come in and then flush there passports down the toliet then by law we have to keep them for months+ to find out where they from which is next to impossiable.
Actually, no it's not. It is however the responsibility of the immigration department to assess poeple who enter the country on grounds of need and merrit. Some entrants seek assylum and the UK is duty bound (By UN mandate) to review each case, as is almost all other countries in the EU, Australia and New Zealand etc.
Old 29 January 2008, 11:35 PM
  #260  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SetoN
Martin you are a good person, i see that in yours posts So i will Un-Tosh you

As for the 'Quoted' above. Isnt that what religion is for nowdays? To give your actions an excuse? Religion is a tool. Muslims have managed to convince many weak minded that it is ok to kill yourself and others in the name of Islam.
Religion is the tool used to persuade the masses that in support of war. War is the tool used to aquire resources.

Islam, is taught from a very early age. Young muslims have to read the Qua'ran from an early age, and understand it's content and use it as a guide to how to live. This is not a requirement in Christianity.
Old 29 January 2008, 11:46 PM
  #261  
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Bubba po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
Islam, is taught from a very early age. Young muslims have to read the Qua'ran from an early age, and understand it's content and use it as a guide to how to live. This is not a requirement in Christianity.
I've never read the Qua'ran (what IS the correct spelling of that? Does anyone know?) but what I DO know is that if you tried to use the Bible as a guide to how to live, you'd pretty soon have a myriad of screwed-up, confused, militaristic, mysogynistic, expansionist, homophobic homicidal maniacs on the streets.
Old 30 January 2008, 12:44 AM
  #262  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
I've never read the Qua'ran (what IS the correct spelling of that? Does anyone know?) but what I DO know is that if you tried to use the Bible as a guide to how to live, you'd pretty soon have a myriad of screwed-up, confused, militaristic, mysogynistic, expansionist, homophobic homicidal maniacs on the streets.
We already have had and do now. Recall your history lessons about the Crusades? And "God" is always on the right side of any conflict.

Many cultural skills, language, technology etc were brought to Europe by muslims at a time when Londoners were living in huts. They were stopped in Spain by Christians.
Old 30 January 2008, 12:53 AM
  #263  
abbott
Scooby Regular
 
abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Narnia
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

from the original post ::::

personally i would torture the funker then report them to the authorities theres far far far too many of these "illegals" in our country
Old 30 January 2008, 10:28 AM
  #264  
gotmashed
Scooby Regular
 
gotmashed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: www.aroundthesouth.co.uk
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
When you say 'something for nothing' you mean treated I take it?
No not just treated. They way i see it if they have/do pay tax they get to use the services provided if they dont/havent then they should have to take out insurance Just like everyone else does if they go to a diffrent country. This is the only way things like the nhs can carry on. We are not the worlds health service and can not afford to be, just like we are not the world police like this goverment seem's to think we are. If however someone is ill and can't get the treatment they need as they live in a 3rd world country then if we can CURE them without pushing back someone who has payed in to the service then we should help out just like every other civilized country should. But if they can work they should to help pay for it even by helping out by cleaning the hospital along side the other staff as i know our hosptal find it hard to get and keep staff so they have to hire cleaning firms which costs more which means less money goes where its needed.

But would i report someone who may or may not be an illegal immigrant yes.
Old 30 January 2008, 11:03 AM
  #265  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gotmashed
No not just treated. They way i see it if they have/do pay tax they get to use the services provided if they dont/havent then they should have to take out insurance Just like everyone else does if they go to a diffrent country. This is the only way things like the nhs can carry on. We are not the worlds health service and can not afford to be, just like we are not the world police like this goverment seem's to think we are. If however someone is ill and can't get the treatment they need as they live in a 3rd world country then if we can CURE them without pushing back someone who has payed in to the service then we should help out just like every other civilized country should. But if they can work they should to help pay for it even by helping out by cleaning the hospital along side the other staff as i know our hosptal find it hard to get and keep staff so they have to hire cleaning firms which costs more which means less money goes where its needed.

But would i report someone who may or may not be an illegal immigrant yes.
**** England here we come!
Old 30 January 2008, 11:17 AM
  #266  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But would i report someone who may or may not be an illegal immigrant yes.

Originally Posted by Klaatu
**** England here we come!
Yes by definition that means he has to report EVERYONE!

Last edited by Martin2005; 30 January 2008 at 11:36 AM.
Old 30 January 2008, 11:26 AM
  #267  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Yes by definition that means he has to report EVERYONE!
Innocents "convicted" by "gestapo"? You jest?
Old 30 January 2008, 02:11 PM
  #268  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
I've never read the Qua'ran (what IS the correct spelling of that? Does anyone know?)

Yes, sir.

Quran or Qua'ran are scholastic versions of Koran. To my knowledge, the word itself is spoken as Kuraan by the Middle Eastern and Eastern Islamic population. Eastern words are usually spellified in favour/convenience of tongue-twisting Euro lingos.

Online Etymology Dictionary says:

Quran-

1876, variant spelling (preferred by scholars) of Koran (q.v.), from Arabic qur'an, lit. "book, reading, recitation," from qara'a "to read."[/quote]




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 PM.