MD321 owners in here please..
21 March 2011, 02:35 PM
#181
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
No slanging match - I won't enter into one and I suspect neither will Martyn/Alan. Sorry to dissapoint
Engine Tuner are a respected company and I'll not try to discredit them on here or anywhere else. And, I'll not contribute to this thread further unless requested to do so.
21 March 2011, 02:37 PM
#182
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course there is! But I felt I had to put in my two penny's worth as it has been suggested that MY poor selection of components was responsible for it not making the power! Especially as my car was handed over to the professionals whom I took advice from and expected good results from.
TX.
21 March 2011, 02:40 PM
#183
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
As I said I'm not here to discredit them, just correcting Martyn when he said it was an STI3 top mount, when in fact it was an STI8. An STI3 would be understandable, but an STI8
21 March 2011, 04:09 PM
#187
Scooby Regular
Apologies Graham, as you are probably aware we see an awful lot of cars and sometimes details escape my memory.
I was stating what I could recall and not slating the turbo due to one less than average result. If you would be good enough to PM your registration I'll look up all of the dyno graphs and re-aquaint myself with it.
Martyn
I was stating what I could recall and not slating the turbo due to one less than average result. If you would be good enough to PM your registration I'll look up all of the dyno graphs and re-aquaint myself with it.
Martyn
21 March 2011, 05:24 PM
#188
Scooby Regular
Never mind, lol. Found it.
Looking at both the map and the graphs, I fail to see what I could have done to make more power from it other than wind in more ignition and or more boost.
Based on the fact that I haven't seen it back blown to pieces, when I mapped it in July 2008, I think I probably made the right decision.
Martyn
Looking at both the map and the graphs, I fail to see what I could have done to make more power from it other than wind in more ignition and or more boost.
Based on the fact that I haven't seen it back blown to pieces, when I mapped it in July 2008, I think I probably made the right decision.
Martyn
Last edited by MartynJ; 21 March 2011 at 06:21 PM.
21 March 2011, 07:05 PM
#189
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Hi Martyn, as I said earlier, it wasn't a criticism, I wanted people to make an informed decission. Hence my correcting the spec to include an STI8 intercooler rather than an STI3 one. 
24 May 2011, 08:53 PM
#198
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Also known as The Gimp
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Recently had my low boost map tweaked by Simon (JGM).
V Power
430 bhp / 378 lbft and made 1.5bar by 3,800 rpm .
Looking to get the High boost map tweaked again with 7% (5ltrs) Meth once the Oil Cooler is on.
Steve
V Power
430 bhp / 378 lbft and made 1.5bar by 3,800 rpm .
Looking to get the High boost map tweaked again with 7% (5ltrs) Meth once the Oil Cooler is on.
Steve
30 December 2011, 10:34 AM
#204
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Also known as The Gimp
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive recently changed to the new billet version on the T.
Has anyone got results from just the turbo change to hand? I've keeping off boost at present until next week but I have noticed straight away how much just by going billet has changed the way the car feels. The noise from the dv delete sounds more chirpy too and thats at the max of 0.4 bar.
Looking at doing a V Power Map and Meth (10ltrs this time). But in all honesty I am not looking a numbers to curious to see what it feels like once mapped as I am blown away by the difference at present.
Has anyone got results from just the turbo change to hand? I've keeping off boost at present until next week but I have noticed straight away how much just by going billet has changed the way the car feels. The noise from the dv delete sounds more chirpy too and thats at the max of 0.4 bar.
Looking at doing a V Power Map and Meth (10ltrs this time). But in all honesty I am not looking a numbers to curious to see what it feels like once mapped as I am blown away by the difference at present.
30 December 2011, 10:38 AM
#205
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive recently changed to the new billet version on the T.
Has anyone got results from just the turbo change to hand? I've keeping off boost at present until next week but I have noticed straight away how much just by going billet has changed the way the car feels. The noise from the dv delete sounds more chirpy too and thats at the max of 0.4 bar.
Looking at doing a V Power Map and Meth (10ltrs this time). But in all honesty I am not looking a numbers to curious to see what it feels like once mapped as I am blown away by the difference at present.
Has anyone got results from just the turbo change to hand? I've keeping off boost at present until next week but I have noticed straight away how much just by going billet has changed the way the car feels. The noise from the dv delete sounds more chirpy too and thats at the max of 0.4 bar.
Looking at doing a V Power Map and Meth (10ltrs this time). But in all honesty I am not looking a numbers to curious to see what it feels like once mapped as I am blown away by the difference at present.
30 December 2011, 03:04 PM
#208
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Put it this way, on my forged 2.5, the turbo is blowing 1bar at 2700rpm and full boost soon after 
The car developed 472/483 when it had only 1400 miles on the clock. Boost response of a Vf35 on a 460bhp turbo. Remarkable!
I'm sure the MD321T billet will be comparable....maybe even better who knows!
The car developed 472/483 when it had only 1400 miles on the clock. Boost response of a Vf35 on a 460bhp turbo. Remarkable! I'm sure the MD321T billet will be comparable....maybe even better who knows!
01 January 2012, 06:15 PM
#209
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Durham
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My old car when fitted with a MD321T
2002 Bug Eye 2.0 WRX with Omega Pistons and rods, 750cc, FMIC Running on OEM wrx heads made
431.3Bhp
361.5Lbs
Mapped By Andy Forest
A tadge laggy tho
2002 Bug Eye 2.0 WRX with Omega Pistons and rods, 750cc, FMIC Running on OEM wrx heads made
431.3Bhp
361.5Lbs
Mapped By Andy Forest
A tadge laggy tho
Last edited by Andygreer; 01 January 2012 at 06:17 PM.
16 January 2012, 06:49 PM
#210
2005 UK STi
2.35 Engine, stock heads with single piece valves
APS DR525 FMIC, Lateral zircotec coated headers, Harvey uppipe,
MD321T
ID 1000 injectors
Syvecs S6 Pnp ecu
Milltek 3" Exhaust with centre section sports CAT
Running on V-Power, 1.8 bar peak dropping to 1.6 bar
443 bhp and 490ft-lb
Run in 4th gear
Running winter tyres when dyno'd.
Goes very well on the road
2.35 Engine, stock heads with single piece valves
APS DR525 FMIC, Lateral zircotec coated headers, Harvey uppipe,
MD321T
ID 1000 injectors
Syvecs S6 Pnp ecu
Milltek 3" Exhaust with centre section sports CAT
Running on V-Power, 1.8 bar peak dropping to 1.6 bar
443 bhp and 490ft-lb
Run in 4th gear
Running winter tyres when dyno'd.
Goes very well on the road
Last edited by STiFreak; 16 January 2012 at 06:52 PM.