Fastest car with less than 1800cc N/A
#33
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all your input, but realy it doesn't matter anymore.
Interesting to see that people don't read and digest before posting though
Interesting to see that people don't read and digest before posting though
#36
#37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still think the S1 Exige would be quickest, if the S2 wasn't allowed.
Only 190HP, shame they didn't stick the R500 TB's on it - 230HP from a 1.8!
Only 190HP, shame they didn't stick the R500 TB's on it - 230HP from a 1.8!
#40
we run a group n integra type r on tarmac rallies and it wins the class most times and handles like a dream.it is a standard engine and box with a mugan ecu revs to 10k every day with nearly 200bhp
#41
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Toyota unit is pants though. Pathetic torque and a powerband as wide as my little finger which also happens to be right at the top of the rev range.
I bet I could tune a BDA to perform better in a car of equal weight
I bet I could tune a BDA to perform better in a car of equal weight
#43
I did ask if a supercharger was allowed in which case I would have changed my answer
Anyway, aside from the perceived qualities of Japanese high revving engines , anyone know a more powerful NA 1800 as I'm interested to know
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The op asked "FASTEST car with less than 1800cc n/a"
Anyway, BHP is not a definition of "powerful" though, it is a measurement of work (torsional force) in a given amount of time to cover a distance (rotation). i.e: torque x rpm/5252
"Powerful" is defined as the capeability of exterting power: That could be BHP as a sole number be it at a point at 8500rpm with a huge trough of nothingness below that, or a broad spread of power from 2000-7000rpm
By mathematics alone, an engine revving past 5252 rpm will display a higher bhp and even more so as the maximum revs increase; despite lack of effective torque, this is why a 1300cc Hayabusa engine will produce 170bhp
The BDA is a production engine in a production car (with a roof), albeit a very rare one
Anyway, BHP is not a definition of "powerful" though, it is a measurement of work (torsional force) in a given amount of time to cover a distance (rotation). i.e: torque x rpm/5252
"Powerful" is defined as the capeability of exterting power: That could be BHP as a sole number be it at a point at 8500rpm with a huge trough of nothingness below that, or a broad spread of power from 2000-7000rpm
By mathematics alone, an engine revving past 5252 rpm will display a higher bhp and even more so as the maximum revs increase; despite lack of effective torque, this is why a 1300cc Hayabusa engine will produce 170bhp
The BDA is a production engine in a production car (with a roof), albeit a very rare one
Last edited by Shark Man; 15 November 2007 at 11:09 PM.
#45
What standard BDA engine in what car are you nominating then?
I think if you asked 10 people on here to measure power on an engine they'd quote you the BHP figure no matter how technically wrong that might be.....
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exige roof does come off. You shouldnt take it off on the s/c model cos of the air duct, but it does unclip off (according to lotus sales guy as i wanted an exige but not happy about buying a tintop car)
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry but Power is work done in a give time, nothing to do with rotation. the m part of rpm is the important bit.
Work does not have to be torsional, altho in an engine it clearly is. Given amount of distance (Eh!!!)
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And seeing this is in relation to an engine I pretty much hope that rotational work /torsional force a given, unless we want to start talking about the reciprocating parts
#51
the VAG kr 1.8 16v 139 bhp as standard but pulls like a train. no use in a heavy mk2 golf but put it in something a little lighter and they're unreal . Can comfortably pull 170bhp with cams and porting.
#53
So the TRD Sport M variant Celica with the standard 200bhp 1.8 ( naturally aspirated ) is the most powerful? Max of 148/149mph for top speed.
I thought there would be something quicker/more powerful lurking around?
I thought there would be something quicker/more powerful lurking around?
#54
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
23 September 2015 09:11 AM