When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
"Not really....." so that's a big fat Yes then.....
it’s a well known defence.
It is now! after being posted by the resident SN police representative!
Besides they are ways around it in certain circumstances.
"Certain circumstances" are not ALL circumstances.... *sighs* best we remember not to educate the ******* on anymore/further ways to avoid prosecution/punishment for their crimes though.....
As regards Freeman, he can't continue to represent a client if they admit their guilt to him and, as stated, it seems as though the police think he may have known they were guilty and suggested various scenarios/excuses that might get them off.
Thats not quite right is it? After all in a number of cases haven't his clients admitted to the offence but got off on technicalities or good reasons why they did what they did.
e.g. Fergeson and Beckham admitted speeding but in the case of Ferguson argued he had the squits, and in Beckham that he was being chased by photoographers
It’s the same thing in this case – he either knew/believed it was stolen, or he didn’t
Originally Posted by Adidas
Therefore, if the said £3000 car was actually valued excessively more you would still have enough to charge with Handling Stolen Goods
True, so the thief just states that he had the correct amount of money in his back pocket. Most solicitors carry a copy of the local news paper for a reason you know.
True, so the thief just states that he had the correct amount of money in his back pocket. Most solicitors carry a copy of the local news paper for a reason you know.
Most Solicitors (or more likely Legal Rep) will submit a prepared statement and let you do all the leg work
When you think, I don't know what his argument was. Part of the custody procedure is to ask her 'Are you taking any form of medication' which she must have answered 'No'
When you think, I don't know what his argument was. Part of the custody procedure is to ask her 'Are you taking any form of medication' which she must have answered 'No'
IIRC, she produced aa bottle that the tablets for her 'condition' had come in.
The only problem was, they were dispensed 9 months after she got nicked