Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Same sex fostering is OK then?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2006 | 09:12 PM
  #361  
jasey's Avatar
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
From: Scotchland
Default

All this talk of Oral sex has reminded me of one of my favourite jokes.

What was your worst blow job like ?







******* Magic

Right kids - you can carry on with your bickering .
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #362  
The Snug Rhino's Avatar
The Snug Rhino
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
From: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
It's called foreplay isn't it. Not unnatural , no.

Chip

lol.....so if you dont have "Normal" intercourse after a BJ it becomes "un-natural"?????
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #363  
Anne Robinson's Avatar
Anne Robinson
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Default

Originally Posted by Peanuts
because it is engaged by consenting adults it is not natural. Natural means "of the way of nature".
Morning, Peanuts, and thanks, I think, for your somewhat laboured reply. Look, I can't keep repeating myself. You for some reason have decided, to put it bluntly, that a **** going into an anus is unnatural, but that a **** going into a mouth, for example, is natural. Can you just take a moment to see how utterly "human" that opinion is, regardless of how many damn dictionaries you have at your disposal? How can you differentiate between them except on some arbitrary morality standpoint? Or are you actually saying that ALL sex acts, with the exception of vaginal sex undertaken to produce babies, are unnatural? Because that's where you're heading. I just don't think you realise it. Or are you under the misapprehension that **** sex only occurs between men? Goodness only knows.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:20 AM
  #364  
Anne Robinson's Avatar
Anne Robinson
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Default

Originally Posted by unclebuck
Ah, I understand now. You have a vastly superior intellect to all of us 'normal' folks. Indeed so vast that it is clearly superior to that of Darwin himself.

No wonder we don't have a clue what you're banging on about.

Morning, unclebuck. Just how juvenile can one person be all by themselves? You stand on the sidelines for page after page of structured and coherent debate, then wade in on the back of one light-hearted comment about a book that you've never even seen, let alone read. Grow up. I'm not inclined to seek more examples of your posts, but I bet I'm not the only person who's ever said that to you. I apologise if you can't (well, let's be clear - don't want to) follow what I've been saying on this thread, but I'm not going to dumb it down just for your benefit now, sorry.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #365  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

Anne Robinson,

I think you might be amazed how many people would go along with the opinion you stated in your second to last sentence in Post No. 363. Not necessarily my opinion though.

Very poor attempt yet again Rannoch.

Les
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #366  
sociopath's Avatar
sociopath
BANNED
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: www.flamingmorons.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Neither will I. I'm not doing anybody's leg work, sorry.

Genetic in this sense, if we're being pedantic, doesn't necessarily imply hereditary, although whilst we're at it, there is *some* (sorry, couldn't resist) suggestion that there's a hereditary element to it too. Who knows. But take time to talk to a few homosexuals, Peanuts, ask them if they thought that being homosexual was just a trendy thing to do. Ask them, with the additional risks, stigmas, prejudices and so on that are involved, why it wouldn't be a whole lot easier to "accept" (in your world) that they are really heterosexual, and stop living a lie. Go on.
Nonce.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #367  
Anne Robinson's Avatar
Anne Robinson
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Default

Originally Posted by sociopath
Nonce.
No-mark serial under-achiever.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #368  
sociopath's Avatar
sociopath
BANNED
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: www.flamingmorons.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
No-mark serial under-achiever.
That's more like it.

Once we unravel all that long winded, pro-nonce b0llocks we can see you are just a harmless, shrivelled up, bitter old (ex)muppet!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #369  
Karl 227's Avatar
Karl 227
BANNED
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 58,500
Likes: 0
From: In my Austrian hole
Default

Tel?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #370  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

Originally Posted by sociopath
That's more like it.

Once we unravel all that long winded, pro-nonce b0llocks we can see you are just a harmless, shrivelled up, bitter old (ex)muppet!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #371  
sociopath's Avatar
sociopath
BANNED
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: www.flamingmorons.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
Beat it Hunt... if you had been doing a half decent job I wouldn't have had to intervene, would I!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #372  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

Originally Posted by sociopath
Beat it Hunt... if you had been doing a half decent job I wouldn't have had to intervene, would I!
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #373  
GCollier's Avatar
GCollier
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 1998
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
I used the word punishment in exactly the way I described later and in the way it is often used in other cases. Such as when a nutter of a driver driving at a stupid speed hits someone and causes serious injuries and then hits a lamp post and does himself a nasty injury as well. It is a common saying that he deserved that as a punishment.
So you're saying now that homosexuals who practise **** sex deserve to contract AIDS as a punishment?

If not then please explain your analogy.

Gary.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 05:36 AM
  #374  
Trout's Avatar
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Thinking about the analogy.

What about the nutter who drives at stupid speed hits someone and kills them, whilst walking away themselves.

Did the third party suffer a punishment or was it an unfortunate consequence?


Or maybe the "stupid nutter of a driver" (non-judgemental words if I ever read them) was actually a father who had just learned that his only son was dying after an horrific accident and he was trying to get to see him before he took his last breath. Did he deserve to hit the lamp post as a punishment.

Strangely context is everything and to continually make statements without context is to have a very narrow view indeed.

Rannoch

Last edited by Trout; Jul 7, 2006 at 12:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 01:21 AM
  #375  
GCollier's Avatar
GCollier
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 1998
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Default

No comments Les?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #376  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

I have made my feelings plain enough. Your grandiloquent efforts to justify an undeniably and disgusting and unnatural action by vilifying me and attempting to denigrate my character for your own purposes have no grounds and could even be taken as purely trolling for your own peculiar reasons.

If you wish to indulge in that sort of sexual habit, that is your own affair and I could not care less.

In the meantime I will stand by everything that I said and I am as entitled to my own opinions as you are.

Les

Last edited by Leslie; Jul 8, 2006 at 01:34 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 12:31 PM
  #377  
unclebuck's Avatar
unclebuck
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
From: Talk to the hand....
Talking

http://www.barrybeelzebub.co.uk/

NOW I’VE nothing against poofs. I think I’ve made it abundantly clear that as long as they keep their deviant practices private, and don’t do it in the street and scare the horses, then it’s up to them.
Indeed, one of my oldest friends Drops Anchor In Poo Harbour, and when his obituary is eventually published in the Daily Telegraph, it will have those wonderful words “He never married” as the last sentence.
I’m also one of those tolerant people who doesn’t automatically assume that all homosexuals are predatory perverts. At a push, I’ll even accept that gay “marriages” fulfil a need in law, namely to safeguard both sides of a partnership.
But let’s get this straight – homosexuality is not normal. God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. And while the insistence of the Loony Left that gay couples must be accorded every right available to normal couples is usually just irritating, we should not ignore the tragic consequences that can occur when this pink bandwagon gets out of control.
We must head north, to Pontefract, West Yorkshire, where some Guardian-reading, leather-elbowed, right-on social worker decided that it was perfectly OK for gay couple Ian Wathey and Craig Faunch to become foster parents. No, really.
In fact, it probably wasn’t a conscious decision in favour of the idea; more likely a politically-correct, panic-stricken paranoia about the consequences of saying “No”.
So Messrs Wathey and Faunch became foster parents, and were subsequently fed a steady supply of vulnerable children, many of whom they went on to sexually abuse. They even specifically requested boys aged five to 12 years old, and still no-one twigged that something was amiss.
Last week the pair were sentenced to a total of 11 years in prison, meaning that they’ll be out in a fortnight or so. But there was someone missing from the dock at Leeds Crown Court - the idiot who thought it was perfectly alright for two gay men to become foster parents in the first place.
Let’s think about this logically. Vulnerable, damaged children need stability and normality. To me, that means a surrogate Father and Mother, and possibly some siblings as well. A normal family environment; one we could all recognise.
What they don’t need is to be abandoned to a life of sexual abuse just so some dimwit at Wakefield District Council can stand up at the next equality seminar and boast about how inclusive their policies are.
It’s not just me, is it? This absolutely stinks. Heads should roll, but don’t hold your breath. These brain dead drones tend to look after each other.
"Guardian-reading, leather-elbowed, right-on social worker"

There's been a few too many of those types on this thread.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 08:23 PM
  #378  
MooseRacer's Avatar
MooseRacer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
From: Sodding Chipbury
Default

Pmsl @ leather elbowed
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 08:08 AM
  #379  
Trout's Avatar
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Leslie,

you miss the point entirely.

And for anyone to criticise someone's depth of argument and to use a word like grandiloquent is a pretentious hypochrite.

What makes you assume I am trying to justify **** sex? All I have done is comment on your prejudicial thoughts expressed in the way you express yourself.

Whether I have **** sex or not is entirely irrelevant.

Here's the thing. If you had posted that you think it is abhorrent and not for you then I am sure most people, including myself would have thought, fair do's it is not Leslie's thing. However you chose to express this in prejudicial language and continue to expand your thinking using prejudicial language, even in the little analogous tale you shared.

Oh, and if you think you are being vilified you are either far more sensitive than you seem, or need to look up what that word means as well.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #380  
Moray's Avatar
Moray
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Default

Nothing like a nice bit of **** first thing in morning
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #381  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

"Grandiloquent" is a perfectly acceptable English word and describes your oh so deep posts very well.

I have not shown any prejudice in my posts, quite the opposite in fact.

So you were trolling after all then!

Les

Last edited by Leslie; Jul 9, 2006 at 11:16 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #382  
Trout's Avatar
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
"Grandiloquent" is a perfectly acceptable English word and describes your oh so deep posts very well.
I didn't say it wasn't acceptable but I wasn't the one being critical of 'high flying semantic essays'.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 10:57 AM
  #383  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

I just thought they were a waste of time Rannoch.

Les
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #384  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #385  
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler's Avatar
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: A stones throw from Canal Street - very handy!!
Default

Originally Posted by Moray
Nothing like a nice bit of **** first thing in morning
I don't, prefer it after a nice warm shower, its cleaner that way
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 09:12 PM
  #386  
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler's Avatar
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: A stones throw from Canal Street - very handy!!
Default

Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
I wish you would you fresh piece of festering puss
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #387  
unclebuck's Avatar
unclebuck
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
From: Talk to the hand....
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Anthony Crichton-Wheeler
I wish you would you fresh piece of festering puss

Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 04:04 AM
  #388  
Trout's Avatar
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
I just thought they were a waste of time Rannoch.

Les
Of course you did, which is why you did not waste any time responding to them as they were meaningless and a waste of time!

Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #389  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

Originally Posted by Anthony Crichton-Wheeler
I wish you would you fresh piece of festering puss
Wow, that's grown up.............
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #390  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

It was only fair to all that I should point it out Rannoch.

Les
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 PM.