You really don't have much of a clue do you Pete! You can listen for the knock signal as much as you like but it can only happen once every power stroke, and you can only detect and adjust for it once every power stroke. So you can't make thousands of adjustments per second as you claimed earlier. Want to dig any more holes, or try to change your story again?

But don't worry Pete, not everyone can be a top class engineer. Just be happy with your lot

 

Pete,

Ive owned 2 impreza's, an MY00 and an MY03 STi, both had knocklinks fitted, both have at one point flickered into the red showing signs of det, unfortunately, my hearing doesnt cover the high amplitude needed to hear the sort of det you can hear (do you have a cold black nose and floppy ears? ) but you are correct in part about the ecu retarding, yes it does, and my MY03 STi does it alot better than the MY00 ever did, BUT only in the given, set parameters that are programmed in.
You should understand that your PC can only do so much, if it wasnt programmed to run a dvd, would it? and for engine stress, if your car acutally did over 50mph it probably would be
Have a good un Pete

Tony

 

You don't have reasoned debates, Pete. You do have some useful rhetorical techniques, though. Such as ignoring salient points from posters who know their stuff; unjustified, open ridicule of people as a smokescreen when you cannot answer; and sheer, dull repetition - which you continue until people can't be arsed anymore.

 

Have you got one?

 

Have I got one what?

 

What we are all talking about dope, a knocklink

 

Of course I don't have a knocklink, you mononeuroned simpleton! what would be the point of that? I didn't mention knocklinks in my post to why quote it, you empty-skulled microcephalic plodder.

I think the knocklink is retarding you, bright spark

I'm merely commenting upon aspects of Lewis's techniques of argumentation that I have noticed over the years.

 

poor deluded pops however i do agree that the coclinks are a waste of time unless you have one seriously modded scoob

 

I manage someone who is just like Pete in his arguments, always thinks he is right and quotes others' mid-statement sentences as hard facts. It is quite interesting to compare approaches.

I have found that the main cause is insecurity, mixed in with a bit of paranoia.

 

In other words nothing useful to say but dig at P.S.Lewis.
Lets jump on the band wagon
Did you miss the start of the thread............................................ .....

 

lewis you have another homo erotic fan

 

That was rude wasnt it?

 

However I say what I say, what I say is totally and absolutely correct.

Trouble is, we have lots of hobbyists on here posting crappy scare stories and they hate it because I don't get scared .... because I know its all ****e!

Pete

 

Not quite! We have another one jumping on the anti Pete band wagon without making a valid point about the issue in question!

 

I'm not on a bandwagon. I want to point out Pete's shortfalls. They are as important on the thread as what he actually has to say! This is because if he has no integrity in how he conducts his debates, then most of what he puts has no value.

 

You couldn't manage your own movements .... I don't know - scared of a little engine noise are we?? scared of the big bullies telling you your engine is about to go BANG?? scared of the shadows are we??

Pete

 

Why are you so interested in Pete! Get a life!
The poster was interested in knocklinks, advise him on them, let him make his own mind up about P.S.Lewis.

 

Bandwagon jumper!!!!

Shortfalls?? Point out, in ENGINEERING terms, why the CockLink helps ANYTHING!! go on , smart ****

Pete

 

The most accurate summary of Pete's debating technique I've seen; spot on .

 

ScoobyNet may not be ready for TWO clever logical posters!!!

You and I

Pete

 

im not jumping on no bandwagon partner .

 

And thats ALL you can say??

Bandwagon jumper too!!

Spineless weasels .................................

Pete

 

Classic example of conflict in Pete's arguments:

1) Pete will say that Subaru are a massive company that know how to build cars so any attempt to make an improvement is futile (eg use a better oil or use a knocklink)
2) He will then say that subaru have not set there dipstick right and that you should always fill the oil to the bottom of the empty-full segment on the dipstick.

Its a case of rules that suit him, and not proper arguments.

The main problem is lack of experience. If he had even once sat in a modified scoob, or even drove his car over 4000rpm i would give him a bit more respect.

 

You plank

1. Yes agree with

2. I said the level should be on the empty, or very near - overfilling these cars with Oil is NOT good ............... or doesn't your COCKLINK tell you that!?

You'll have to do better than that to compete with me young man!!

Pete

 

Wow somebody that can even think about tossing off a monkey....
Well your on your own there pal.
I prefer women but each to their own.
Whatever floats your boat matey.
Do you also like sheep....Baaaaaah


=kingofturds]im not jumping on no bandwagon partner . [/quote]

 

Point two in Bubba's summary Pete..... I'm not a bandwagon jumper; I expressed my opinion at the beginning so I dont feel the need to repeat it now. It's ironic, isn't it?

 

Im going to bed now; Good Night.

 

Hey! If they are soooooo fragile why buy them ?????

 

[/quote]

come on your so far up ps lewis's *** he can see your face when he brushes his teeth in the morning i do like sheep they taste mighty fine. and are very tender after i **** them silly

 

they're not fragile.

why have a water temp gauge???????

--just incase