Knocklink
10 February 2006, 11:49 PM
#91
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pslewis
You complete frigging idiot 
The knock sensor does NOT listen at a TIMED sequence!!
It is listening steplessly, ie. all the time to all intents and purposes
Whatever the timing of the detonation, whether it be once an hour or 200 times a second does NOT matter one jot!
You are clear living proof that Morons once shagged Village Idiots!!
Pete
The knock sensor does NOT listen at a TIMED sequence!!
It is listening steplessly, ie. all the time to all intents and purposes
Whatever the timing of the detonation, whether it be once an hour or 200 times a second does NOT matter one jot!
You are clear living proof that Morons once shagged Village Idiots!!
Pete
But don't worry Pete, not everyone can be a top class engineer. Just be happy with your lot
Last edited by Sprint Chief; 11 February 2006 at 12:01 AM.
10 February 2006, 11:51 PM
#92
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Pete,
Ive owned 2 impreza's, an MY00 and an MY03 STi, both had knocklinks fitted, both have at one point flickered into the red showing signs of det, unfortunately, my hearing doesnt cover the high amplitude needed to hear the sort of det you can hear (do you have a cold black nose and floppy ears?
) but you are correct in part about the ecu retarding, yes it does, and my MY03 STi does it alot better than the MY00 ever did, BUT only in the given, set parameters that are programmed in.
You should understand that your PC can only do so much, if it wasnt programmed to run a dvd, would it? and for engine stress, if your car acutally did over 50mph it probably would be 
Have a good un Pete
Tony
Ive owned 2 impreza's, an MY00 and an MY03 STi, both had knocklinks fitted, both have at one point flickered into the red showing signs of det, unfortunately, my hearing doesnt cover the high amplitude needed to hear the sort of det you can hear (do you have a cold black nose and floppy ears?
) but you are correct in part about the ecu retarding, yes it does, and my MY03 STi does it alot better than the MY00 ever did, BUT only in the given, set parameters that are programmed in.You should understand that your PC can only do so much, if it wasnt programmed to run a dvd, would it?
and for engine stress, if your car acutally did over 50mph it probably would be Have a good un Pete
Tony
10 February 2006, 11:51 PM
#93
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pslewis
They simply cannot take me down on their own, so gang up into a pack and attempt it ............. they usual lose even then
They are not capable of a reasoned one on one debate with me .... I am far too superior
Pete
They are not capable of a reasoned one on one debate with me .... I am far too superior
Pete
10 February 2006, 11:53 PM
#94
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you got one?
Originally Posted by Bubba po
You don't have reasoned debates, Pete. You do have some useful rhetorical techniques, though. Such as ignoring salient points from posters who know their stuff; unjustified, open ridicule of people as a smokescreen when you cannot answer; and sheer, dull repetition - which you continue until people can't be arsed anymore.
11 February 2006, 12:03 AM
#97
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course I don't have a knocklink, you mononeuroned simpleton! what would be the point of that? I didn't mention knocklinks in my post to why quote it, you empty-skulled microcephalic plodder.
I think the knocklink is retarding you, bright spark
I'm merely commenting upon aspects of Lewis's techniques of argumentation that I have noticed over the years.
I didn't mention knocklinks in my post to why quote it, you empty-skulled microcephalic plodder.I think the knocklink is retarding you, bright spark
I'm merely commenting upon aspects of Lewis's techniques of argumentation that I have noticed over the years.
11 February 2006, 12:04 AM
#98
Originally Posted by pslewis
They simply cannot take me down on their own, so gang up into a pack and attempt it ............. they usual lose even then
They are not capable of a reasoned one on one debate with me .... I am far too superior
Pete
They are not capable of a reasoned one on one debate with me .... I am far too superior
Pete
however i do agree that the coclinks are a waste of time unless you have one seriously modded scoob
11 February 2006, 12:05 AM
#99
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Taunton
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bubba po
You don't have reasoned debates, Pete. You do have some useful rhetorical techniques, though. Such as ignoring salient points from posters who know their stuff; unjustified, open ridicule of people as a smokescreen when you cannot answer; and sheer, dull repetition - which you continue until people can't be arsed anymore.
I manage someone who is just like Pete in his arguments, always thinks he is right and quotes others' mid-statement sentences as hard facts. It is quite interesting to compare approaches.
I have found that the main cause is insecurity, mixed in with a bit of paranoia.
11 February 2006, 12:05 AM
#100
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In other words nothing useful to say but dig at P.S.Lewis.
Lets jump on the band wagon
Did you miss the start of the thread............................................ .....
Lets jump on the band wagon
Did you miss the start of the thread............................................ .....
Originally Posted by Bubba po
Of course I don't have a knocklink, you mononeuroned simpleton! what would be the point of that?
I think the knocklink is retarding you, bright spark
I'm merely commenting upon aspects of Lewis's techniques of argumentation that I have noticed over the years.
I think the knocklink is retarding you, bright spark
I'm merely commenting upon aspects of Lewis's techniques of argumentation that I have noticed over the years.
11 February 2006, 12:08 AM
#103
Scooby Regular
However I say what I say, what I say is totally and absolutely correct.
Trouble is, we have lots of hobbyists on here posting crappy scare stories and they hate it because I don't get scared .... because I know its all ****e!
Pete
Trouble is, we have lots of hobbyists on here posting crappy scare stories and they hate it because I don't get scared .... because I know its all ****e!
Pete
11 February 2006, 12:08 AM
#104
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite! We have another one jumping on the anti Pete band wagon without making a valid point about the issue in question!
Originally Posted by kingofturds
lewis you have another homo erotic fan
11 February 2006, 12:08 AM
#105
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nik52wrx
In other words nothing useful to say but dig at P.S.Lewis.
Lets jump on the band wagon
Did you miss the start of the thread............................................ .....
Lets jump on the band wagon
Did you miss the start of the thread............................................ .....
11 February 2006, 12:10 AM
#106
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Roojai
I manage someone who is just like Pete
Pete
11 February 2006, 12:11 AM
#107
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why are you so interested in Pete! Get a life!
The poster was interested in knocklinks, advise him on them, let him make his own mind up about P.S.Lewis.
The poster was interested in knocklinks, advise him on them, let him make his own mind up about P.S.Lewis.
Originally Posted by Bubba po
I'm not on a bandwagon. I want to point out Pete's shortfalls. They are as important on the thread as what he actually has to say! This is because if he has no integrity in how he conducts his debates, then most of what he puts has no value.
11 February 2006, 12:12 AM
#108
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Bubba po
I'm not on a bandwagon. I want to point out Pete's shortfalls.
Shortfalls?? Point out, in ENGINEERING terms, why the CockLink helps ANYTHING!! go on , smart ****
Pete
11 February 2006, 12:12 AM
#109
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bubba po
You don't have reasoned debates, Pete. You do have some useful rhetorical techniques, though. Such as ignoring salient points from posters who know their stuff; unjustified, open ridicule of people as a smokescreen when you cannot answer; and sheer, dull repetition - which you continue until people can't be arsed anymore.
11 February 2006, 12:13 AM
#110
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by nik52wrx
Why are you so interested in Pete! Get a life!
The poster was interested in knocklinks, advise him on them, let him make his own mind up about P.S.Lewis.
The poster was interested in knocklinks, advise him on them, let him make his own mind up about P.S.Lewis.
You and I
Pete
11 February 2006, 12:14 AM
#112
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by GC8
The most accurate summary of Pete's debating technique I've seen; spot on .
Bandwagon jumper too!!
Spineless weasels .................................
Pete
11 February 2006, 12:14 AM
#113
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Taunton
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Classic example of conflict in Pete's arguments:
1) Pete will say that Subaru are a massive company that know how to build cars so any attempt to make an improvement is futile (eg use a better oil or use a knocklink)
2) He will then say that subaru have not set there dipstick right and that you should always fill the oil to the bottom of the empty-full segment on the dipstick.
Its a case of rules that suit him, and not proper arguments.
The main problem is lack of experience. If he had even once sat in a modified scoob, or even drove his car over 4000rpm i would give him a bit more respect.
1) Pete will say that Subaru are a massive company that know how to build cars so any attempt to make an improvement is futile (eg use a better oil or use a knocklink)
2) He will then say that subaru have not set there dipstick right and that you should always fill the oil to the bottom of the empty-full segment on the dipstick.
Its a case of rules that suit him, and not proper arguments.
The main problem is lack of experience. If he had even once sat in a modified scoob, or even drove his car over 4000rpm i would give him a bit more respect.
11 February 2006, 12:17 AM
#114
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Roojai
Classic example of conflict in Pete's arguments:
1) Pete will say that Subaru are a massive company that know how to build cars so any attempt to make an improvement is futile (eg use a better oil or use a knocklink)
2) He will then say that subaru have not set there dipstick right and that you should always fill the oil to the bottom of the empty-full segment on the dipstick.
Its a case of rules that suite him, and not proper arguments.
The main problem is lack of experience. If he had even once sat in a modified scoob, or even drove his car over 4000rpm i would give him a bit more respect.
1) Pete will say that Subaru are a massive company that know how to build cars so any attempt to make an improvement is futile (eg use a better oil or use a knocklink)
2) He will then say that subaru have not set there dipstick right and that you should always fill the oil to the bottom of the empty-full segment on the dipstick.
Its a case of rules that suite him, and not proper arguments.
The main problem is lack of experience. If he had even once sat in a modified scoob, or even drove his car over 4000rpm i would give him a bit more respect.
1. Yes agree with
2. I said the level should be on the empty, or very near - overfilling these cars with Oil is NOT good ............... or doesn't your COCKLINK tell you that!?
You'll have to do better than that to compete with me young man!!
Pete
11 February 2006, 12:17 AM
#115
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow somebody that can even think about tossing off a monkey....
Well your on your own there pal.
I prefer women but each to their own.
Whatever floats your boat matey.
Do you also like sheep....Baaaaaah
=kingofturds]im not jumping on no bandwagon partner . 
[/quote]
Well your on your own there pal.
I prefer women but each to their own.
Whatever floats your boat matey.
Do you also like sheep....Baaaaaah
=kingofturds]im not jumping on no bandwagon partner
. [/quote]
11 February 2006, 12:17 AM
#116
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Point two in Bubba's summary Pete..... I'm not a bandwagon jumper; I expressed my opinion at the beginning so I dont feel the need to repeat it now. It's ironic, isn't it?
11 February 2006, 12:20 AM
#119
Originally Posted by nik52wrx
Wow somebody that can even think about tossing off a monkey....
Well your on your own there pal.
I prefer women but each to their own.
Whatever floats your boat matey.
Do you also like sheep....Baaaaaah
=kingofturds]im not jumping on no bandwagon partner .
Well your on your own there pal.
I prefer women but each to their own.
Whatever floats your boat matey.
Do you also like sheep....Baaaaaah
=kingofturds]im not jumping on no bandwagon partner
. come on your so far up ps lewis's *** he can see your face when he brushes his teeth in the morning
i do like sheep they taste mighty fine. and are very tender after i **** them silly