Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Hooray Henrys and the poor Fox!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #31  
rik-1's Avatar
rik-1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Langley, Berkshire
Default

best quote I've heard about the fox hunting debate;

It's 10% about animal welfare and 90% about class warfare.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #32  
Bonehead's Avatar
Bonehead
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NotoriousREV
I happen to think that Golf is a **** sport only played by people to enhance their social standing, it has no real point and destroys vast tracts of open land leaving them accessible to funny-pant wearing prats. Ban it before fox-hunting.

<awaits a 9 iron round the back of the head>
PMSL @ REV - Superb!!

Seriously though, I can't help but think - Is fox hunting really the most IMPORTANT thing for our ultra professional, useful and effective MP's to devote time to?........NHS, Crime, etc anyone?

It's 10% about animal welfare and 90% about class warfare - Totally agree w that

Last edited by Bonehead; Nov 17, 2004 at 10:41 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:46 PM
  #33  
Chins's Avatar
Chins
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Red face

Originally Posted by ajm
Pete,

I rather fancy you'd enjoy a spot of fox hunting if you gave it a try... a warier prey and a more sporting fight than trolling on Scoobynet for the hapless few remaining that havn't seen your act!
Pete is the leading sponser of the green party and helps fund the wishy washy liberal democrats. Needs some B****, glad we dont need him in our time of need
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:47 PM
  #34  
Tentenths's Avatar
Tentenths
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bonehead
...Is fox hunting really the most IMPORTANT thing for our ultra professional, useful and effective MP's to devote time to?........NHS, Crime, etc anyone?...
Quite a useful diversion if you're trying to rush through some last minute, deeply unpopular pensions legislation that you don't want debated for too long. As if...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #35  
Adrian F's Avatar
Adrian F
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 0
Default

Yes it the Labour MP's still fighting the class war which they have already lost.

If they actuall want to represent the views of the people who voted for them then bring back hanging which does have the support of the Public.

Oh NO i forgot they arent they to represent us unless it suites them.

What next fishing or Boxing or Horse racing? all Sports with animals suffering.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 11:41 PM
  #36  
hedgehog's Avatar
hedgehog
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Default

This isn't about class, it is about people in the towns wanting to enforce their ideals on people in the country. Now, I appreciate that for many of you in the towns you imagine that everyone in the country lives in big houses and drives a Roller but the truth is far from that.

More and more we see the government and the left wing living the Stalinist ideal of oppressing the peasants, regardless of their social standing. Even Stalin never fully managed to force the peasants to toe the line, though he killed 26 million in Ukraine trying. Take a look at this picture for example, this is what Greenpeace and the Labour Government want to do to a small community which depends on tourism for much of it's income. But of course you can't see this spot from London so no one really cares:

http://www.lewiswind.com/es/PDFS/LVA%20Mon%2013.59a.pdf

This is a mock up picture, produced by the people who want to build the turbines and not including the 5 quarries and 100 miles of new road ripping across the bog. Lest you think I am showing the worst view the following is a similar picture taken right on the other side of the island, about 40 minutes drive from the one above. The view from almost anywhere else in the north of the island will be similar. Not in your back garden city environmentalists:

http://www.lewiswind.com/es/PDFS/LVA%20Mon%2013.26b.pdf

Have I lost the plot? What is this to do with fox hunting? Well, it is another example of nutter, city bound, environmentalists telling the people in the countryside, the very people who have preserved the countryside for about 10,000 years now, how they should live their lives.

So, not only should fox hunting not be banned but a new sport should be created where people from the countryside get to hunt nutter environmentalists with hounds. Sounds like an excellent form of pest control to me and you could probably even charge for admission.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #37  
astraboy's Avatar
astraboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,368
Likes: 0
Default

I'm waiting for it to get banned.
Then I'll take part in any "illegal" hunt I can.
I can see it now, Answerphone messages, meetups on industrial estates, Hunts starting at midnight Saturday and going on till 4pm Sunday morning.
Websites like www.huntjuice.com starting up.
I think I've just found the way to spend my spare time in my thirties
astraboy.
P.S. And yes I'm serious, illegal hunts are the future, I'll see you there!
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 03:33 AM
  #38  
Mark Miwurdz's Avatar
Mark Miwurdz
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
From: nix fur bremser...
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by pslewis
Listen to them, "Oh, jolly hockey sticks - how is one to enjoy oneself if one cannot go out and watch a little ole fox get ripped to pieces whilst still alive"

"Golly Gosh, we will shout and scream and stamp our feet"

Bloody PATHETIC!! The upper crust have NEVER put their liberty or lives on the line, they haven't the *****!

Lets get the ban in NOW and throw ANYONE who chases a fox in prison for 1 year - let them be someones bitch ..... as they run through the corridors of prison chased by a Big Black Man with a tube of KY Jelly in his hand, maybe they might feel what the Fox feels as its about to get fukced up!!

Pete
If you are being serious, you're a bigger **** than I thought you were.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 07:06 AM
  #39  
r32's Avatar
r32
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
From: Far Corfe
Default

Ask a chicken .................? She'd say pull it to pieces ..............
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:05 AM
  #40  
Diablo's Avatar
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
From: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Default

Originally Posted by hedgehog
This isn't about class, it is about people in the towns wanting to enforce their ideals on people in the country. Now, I appreciate that for many of you in the towns you imagine that everyone in the country lives in big houses and drives a Roller but the truth is far from that.

More and more we see the government and the left wing living the Stalinist ideal of oppressing the peasants, regardless of their social standing. Even Stalin never fully managed to force the peasants to toe the line, though he killed 26 million in Ukraine trying. Take a look at this picture for example, this is what Greenpeace and the Labour Government want to do to a small community which depends on tourism for much of it's income. But of course you can't see this spot from London so no one really cares:

http://www.lewiswind.com/es/PDFS/LVA%20Mon%2013.59a.pdf

This is a mock up picture, produced by the people who want to build the turbines and not including the 5 quarries and 100 miles of new road ripping across the bog. Lest you think I am showing the worst view the following is a similar picture taken right on the other side of the island, about 40 minutes drive from the one above. The view from almost anywhere else in the north of the island will be similar. Not in your back garden city environmentalists:

http://www.lewiswind.com/es/PDFS/LVA%20Mon%2013.26b.pdf

Have I lost the plot? What is this to do with fox hunting? Well, it is another example of nutter, city bound, environmentalists telling the people in the countryside, the very people who have preserved the countryside for about 10,000 years now, how they should live their lives.

So, not only should fox hunting not be banned but a new sport should be created where people from the countryside get to hunt nutter environmentalists with hounds. Sounds like an excellent form of pest control to me and you could probably even charge for admission.
[puts aside pete's clear attempt at another wind up ]

LOL

Can it not, perhaps, just be about the fact that people, on the whole, find the nature of the chase and killing by dogs at man's command abhorrent in a supposedly civilised society?

And the fact that in forcing a ban on the back of that B.Liar may gain some additional support?

[/returns to Pete's wind up]

Christ Pete, have we not done this to death
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #41  
popeye's Avatar
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Thumbs up

It's not often you get the chance to congratulate politicians, but this seems an appropriate time to sing the praises of the anti-hunting MPs, who have stood firm depsite the nonsense, lies, abuse and threats of violence and intimidation from the pro-hunt morons. It must have been tough at times, and I applaud them all. A clear victory for democracry.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:25 AM
  #42  
Diesel's Avatar
Diesel
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,280
Likes: 0
Default

They are shooting deer in Richmond park today. Bambis being popped off Has to be done to control the numbers apparantely. This is acceptable as no one is deriving a primitive sick pleasure from the chase and kill.

Same values and levels of civilised behaviour should apply to all animals - particularly when the agressor wont even eat his catch...

If they want to kill them then they must eat them; simple!

D
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #43  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

Regardless of how we all feel about fox hunting, it is a pity to see such an unpleasant example of inverted snobbery, very much misplaced as well.

Les
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:33 AM
  #44  
ajm's Avatar
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
From: The biosphere
Default

When the ban comes in I'll continue to be out supporting the hunts all the way. Yet another group of people forced into criminality by New Labour. I am already a criminal for having 3pts on my license, so I may aswell get nicked for supporting a traditional English country pursuit while I'm at it.

By the time they have banned shooting and fishing and any other pastimes city folk don't like I guess I'll be banged up! Nice one Labour, cheers for that!

Incidentally, this "class war" is a one sided affair. The anti's see the hunts as upper class, but there are many hunts that are originally working class, so all this "jolly hockey sticks" and "hooray henry's" nonsense is completely misplaced.

Last edited by ajm; Nov 18, 2004 at 08:36 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #45  
FrenchBoy's Avatar
FrenchBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: South Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by Chins
Does the protest move to Spain next and its Bull fighting ?
Lets hope so.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #46  
Tentenths's Avatar
Tentenths
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by r32
Ask a chicken .................? She'd say pull it to pieces ..............
Probably not, if she lived in a nice secure coop in an urban area
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:51 AM
  #47  
letdown's Avatar
letdown
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong......
Talking

Is it not true that 20,000 odd hounds will be put down if hunting is banned?

Now as a nation of so called "Dog lovers" this would seem a bit weird.

So how do all the "Dog lovers" that are on this BBS feel about this?

Mmmmmmmm food for thought.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:01 AM
  #48  
Pastor's Avatar
Pastor
BANNED
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Default

I'm glad fox hunting is being banned in one sense. Although I have no moral stance on people hunting what I have observed first hand is the bad attitude of certain hunters/supporters.
Why do they seem to assume they can enter onto other people's land in persuit of the hunt? This seems a common occurance. Add to this the way they drove, endangering the lives of other road users and harrassing the people of the village and I have no qualms in wanting to see them banned.
In short their attitude is what I have a problem with not the activity in itself.

Generally speaking I believe people should be left to do their own thing as long as it isn't antisocial. Unfortunately these people seem to think they are a cut above the rest of us and that tradition gives them the right to act as they please.

Not any more though, here's a toast to some of them going to prison for their "ideals".
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:15 AM
  #49  
Redkop's Avatar
Redkop
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 11,403
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
When the ban comes in I'll continue to be out supporting the hunts all the way. Yet another group of people forced into criminality by New Labour. I am already a criminal for having 3pts on my license, so I may aswell get nicked for supporting a traditional English country pursuit while I'm at it.

By the time they have banned shooting and fishing and any other pastimes city folk don't like I guess I'll be banged up! Nice one Labour, cheers for that!

Incidentally, this "class war" is a one sided affair. The anti's see the hunts as upper class, but there are many hunts that are originally working class, so all this "jolly hockey sticks" and "hooray henry's" nonsense is completely misplaced.
This is going to come as a shock.... but I agree with you totally ajm Before I moved to Shropshire, I used to regularly hunt [it was a good way to keep my horses fit during the winter]. The misconception of all being 'hooray henrys' is total bollox!
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #50  
VTEC to Turbo's Avatar
VTEC to Turbo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
From: 310Nm oil burner....
Default

This is just another example of our country being erroded away! I personally don't have particular issue with hunting. It is an industry (including fishing etc) that cost the government nothing to run, provides thousands of jobs, yet if they ban it thousands of jobs will be lost - are these people then supposed to live off government handouts?

President Blair has been quoted as saying "No 10 says Mr Blair would back a plan to allow licensed fox hunts but ban stag hunts and hare coursing."

Yet another tax issue all along! If it was a moral issue then he would except no less than a total ban!

This man is a power crazed egomaniac like no other before him! This government makes me laugh!
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:26 AM
  #51  
Muffleman's Avatar
Muffleman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: West Sussex
Default

I'm happy to be proved wrong, but no-one actually pays for the fox hunting services right ? I mean it's all funded by those owning the horses, hounds etc etc

So they wouldn't actually lose any money if they didn't catch a fox ? In which case, why is it a problem ? They can all still go out and trump around the greenbelt in their daft outfits, tootling their horns and exercising their dogs and horses, just without the barbaric ripping of foxes to pieces.

Hiding behind the 'necessary' culling of foxes is bo11ocks, there's no revenue generated by the catching of the fox. Therefore, they should be allowed to continue owning the horses, and they dont have to put down 20,000 hounds etc, and go on their horsey adventures when ever they like. No-one loses out, no-one loses their jobs either ! Simple.

I do approve of the necessary culling, and marksmen on quad bikes I don't have a problem with. It's the way in which the hunts kill the foxes that is unacceptable, and I'm very happy with the ban.

Matt
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:27 AM
  #52  
ajm's Avatar
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
From: The biosphere
Default

Originally Posted by Redkop
This is going to come as a shock.... but I agree with you totally ajm


We had to agree on something sometime I suppose.... put enough monkeys infront of enough keyboards etc...
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:55 AM
  #53  
Redkop's Avatar
Redkop
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 11,403
Likes: 0
Default

Killing foxes with hounds is 100% effective - they are killed, simple! Using guns isn't a way of effectively killing them, as IMO more will end up being wounded and suffer a long painful death.

In answer to someone elses question, yes all the hounds will probably be destroyed, as they are not suitable to be kept as pets. So the Fox Hound will soon be an extinct species
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:05 AM
  #54  
popeye's Avatar
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Post

Originally Posted by Redkop
Killing foxes with hounds is 100% effective - they are killed, simple! Using guns isn't a way of effectively killing them, as IMO more will end up being wounded and suffer a long painful death.:
How does this tie in with all people you've seen come on here and go, "I've been on a hunt, and I can tell you, the fox rarely gets caught!" ?

And how about the proven statistic that during foot and mouth, the fox population remained constant? Where are you getting this information about the need for foxes to be killed by the hunt?

Originally Posted by Redkop
In answer to someone elses question, yes all the hounds will probably be destroyed, as they are not suitable to be kept as pets. So the Fox Hound will soon be an extinct species
So what happens to these hounds when they're of no use to the hunt, and they can't be re-housed? I wouldn't get too dewy-eyed about them. You'll find that they're destroyed anyway when they've outlived thier usefulness.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #55  
IWatkins's Avatar
IWatkins
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Default

Originally Posted by Redkop
Killing foxes with hounds is 100% effective - they are killed, simple! Using guns isn't a way of effectively killing them, as IMO more will end up being wounded and suffer a long painful death.
And you get these facts and figures from where exactly ?

Many a fox becomes injured during the chase and some of these then escape the hounds to go on to suffer badly or die later. I've found quite a few foxes with broken legs with dog bite marks on them a few days after the hunt goes through here. I tend to put them out of their misery if I can.

The dogs themselves also suffer broken legs, ripped bellies from barbed wire fences etc. etc.

Shooting a fox properly is instant. By properly I mean with a rifle and by someone who knows what they are doing. It is the farmer with his 12 bore at 60yards that only wounds foxes that are the problem.

Ian
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #56  
Dream Weaver's Avatar
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 4
From: Lancashire
Default

I just wish the gov't spent more time and money on fighting car crime, burglaries and car jackings than banning small things such as fox hunting.

I'm not for or against it, I eat cows ffs, so why should a fox be any different.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:18 AM
  #57  
popeye's Avatar
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Post

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
I just wish the gov't spent more time and money on fighting car crime, burglaries and car jackings than banning small things such as fox hunting. .
We all do mate, but we all know who's dragging this out.

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
I'm not for or against it, I eat cows ffs, so why should a fox be any different.
'

If you've got any video footage of you tearing across a field on horseback with a pack of dogs in hot pursuit of a cow whilst blowing a horn, then post it up. Should be a laugh.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #58  
kob999's Avatar
kob999
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ken 275

Humane killing, simple but effective.

Fact : foxes are vermin.

Fact : farmers lose stock to foxes.

Fact : foxes kill an excess of what they need to eat.


K.
Foxes are not vermin. In fact they are a top level prdator that plays a major role in controlling vermin such as rats rabbits etc.

Correct farmers do occasionally loose lambs to foxes but not in any significant numbers. Foxes are extremely timid and even a recently born lamb if fit and healthy would an xtremely difficult kill for a fox. Farmers in my area spend far more time worrying about the weather during lambing season than the prspet that they will loose stock to foxes

Foxes kill in excess of what they need to eat.
In a natural environment this is completely untrue. Foxes in the wild are clever enough to realise that in a situation where prey is abundant that it makes sense to kill more than you need right now and bury it so it can be used later when food is harder to come by. The situation you are referring to is the much used fox in a chicken coup scenario where the fox will kill all the chickens because it's instincts kick in and the chickens are unable to escape. This is a completely unnatural scenario which I suspect rarely happens and if it did would be entirely the fault of the person breeding the chickens for not protecting them correctly.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:27 AM
  #59  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

If there is a third term, we can wave goodbye to the British way of life and to our country for that matter!

Les
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:31 AM
  #60  
ajm's Avatar
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
From: The biosphere
Default

Originally Posted by popeye
We all do mate, but we all know who's dragging this out.
This stock reply of "it's the hunters who are wasting government time" is simply not applicable. Whilst people are being raped, robbed and murdered and innocent people are suffering due to loopholes and inconsistancies in existing legislation the government has no business bringing such cynical, petty and insignificant bills and new legislation infront of parliament and the house of lords in the first place.

Rape, robbery and murder are obviously already banned, but the government have decided its easier to ban a minority sport because its an easy target and its perceived they may get a few votes than it is to solve the countries REAL problems and get ALL the votes.
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 PM.