Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Ok, Fox Hunting.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 September 2004, 04:33 PM
  #243  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
LOL yeah it was another bit of legislation rushed through at the last minute, the townys wanted to go hunting toffs with killer rabid foxes but it was banned also unfortunately
Shame - sounds like it could be second to Beach Volleyball as a spectator sport .
Old 16 September 2004, 04:41 PM
  #245  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wonder how Ted Nugent would vote.

http://www.tnugent.com/photos/hunt/porkslam2.JPG
Old 16 September 2004, 04:43 PM
  #246  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

X ..
Old 16 September 2004, 04:50 PM
  #247  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
Absolute rubbish, my stance is the same as just about everyone else who is against hunting with hounds, its barbaric and extremely cruel, just like all other blood sports such as badger baiting and **** fighting. Therefore on that basis it needs banning. Not difficult really ajm as that was the main reason it has been banned! Wakey wakey old chap!

Oh and what actions exactly? I don't own any cats so can't be held liable by loonies like you who think cats should be controlled
You keep shouting "rubbish" without actually qualifying what in particular I am saying that you think is wrong. A trait you share, in fact, with the late NACRO, god bless his soul.

You say the act of killing is cruel, I say it is no more cruel than cats killing. You say fox hunting makes no difference on fox numbers, I say cats DO make a difference on small mammal and bird numbers.

Yes its banned, I am not denying that, all I am saying is that banning it was a bad idea and that your reasons for supporting the ban are wrong and, furthermore, hypocritcal.

Oh and it doesn't matter whether you still own a cat or not. The fact you no longer have one doesn't absolve you from the responsibility for the damage it did to indigenous wildlife whilst in your care!

Now, if you must have the last word get on with it and make it good so we can get on with our lives......... in other threads!
Old 16 September 2004, 05:14 PM
  #249  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
No need, you quite clearly have to have the last word with repeating the same old rubbish even though I have more than suitably answered your terribly bad claims and the fact you have to keep coming back even though as you claim you are busy with other threads. So I will bow out now so you can reply to this and win your minowesque victory of having the final say, i'll settle for the fact I know in less than 2 years fox hunting with hounds will be illegal and assigned to history
Assigned to history might be a bit ambitious (Indeed Illegal could be too) - This debate aint over .
Old 17 September 2004, 02:08 AM
  #250  
martyrobertsdj
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
martyrobertsdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: York-ish
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The fact that cats kill wildlife is unquestionable, but does that mean that in a few years time, when the political correctness has gone totally mental we'll have a ban on keeping them as pets.....or at least be banned from letting them out of the house???

I have four cats, my neighbour has.....erm.....five I think, the next neighbour has two and there are approximately six feral cats on the farm where I live.

Cats are superb hunters and do like to "play" with their catches, but we still see loads of rats and mice on the farm. I'd think if the cats were as wicked as a lot of people think, we'd see far less mice.

My cats often bring home mice, but many times I am able to rescue them and set them free again, as the cats seem to enjoy letting them go in the conservatory *cue ....... fun trying to catch them*

Birds are a different matter.....when they catch birds and bring them home, they tend to be dead, but in all honesty there aren't many birds brought in.

I do like all animals (except wasps........even wasps hate wasps!!!), but I wouldn't stop having cats as pets just to save a few mice and birds!!! SELFISH OR WHAT??
I just love cats!!!
And dogs...I have two of them too!!!!

Marty
Old 17 September 2004, 08:16 AM
  #251  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
You say the act of killing is cruel, I say it is no more cruel than cats killing
Ajm you are missing one fundimental point.

Cats are animals, domestic (arguably ), but animals never the less. They have basic survival instincts to hunt, albeit they are generally fed by their owners.

Human beings are supposed to be civilised.

There should be no comparison between a cat or a fox killing and humans using dogs to catch and kill a fox (or any other animal for that matter)

D
Old 17 September 2004, 08:28 AM
  #252  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default



I thought the point was that there was going to be a ban on hunting foxes with hounds, not cats?
Old 17 September 2004, 08:35 AM
  #253  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SJ_Skyline


I thought the point was that there was going to be a ban on hunting foxes with hounds, not cats?
It's going to be a ban on hunting with dogs - I wonder if you could carry on hunting with your bitches
Old 17 September 2004, 09:56 AM
  #254  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Diablo
Ajm you are missing one fundimental point.

Cats are animals, domestic (arguably ), but animals never the less. They have basic survival instincts to hunt, albeit they are generally fed by their owners.

Human beings are supposed to be civilised.

There should be no comparison between a cat or a fox killing and humans using dogs to catch and kill a fox (or any other animal for that matter)

D
What I am saying is, putting people's very differing views of civility or morals to one side, collectively cat owners are doing more damage to British ecology than fox hunters. I couldn't care less that some people find hunting offensive, I am dealing in facts pertinent to the more important issue of what activity does more damage to nature on an ecological scale.

Cat ownership does more damage, and if you are going to play the numbers game, cat owners indirectly kill thousands more animals than fox hunters and each of these animals dies in the same violent way.

A fox dieing in the mouths of the hounds is no "crueller" than a mouse dieing in the claws of a cat, and the fact that you are not purposefully releasing the cat to kill is irrelevant because you release it knowing it WILL kill.

Therefore cat owners who look down their noses at hunters are hypocrites because the results of releasing animals TO kill and releasing animals KNOWING they will kill are exactly the same!
Old 17 September 2004, 12:13 PM
  #255  
5C008Y
Scooby Regular
 
5C008Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you ask me it's HUMANS that are the vermin.
Kill all humans and the world will eventually find a natural balance again
Old 17 September 2004, 12:55 PM
  #256  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
Go start a cat thread ajm, the subject here is Fox Hunting.
It is obvious that the concept I am trying to explain, and its relevance to Fox Hunting, is beyond the comprehension of a few people here and I don't have the inclination to spend any more time helping them to understand or identifiying whether it is simple ignorance or sheer bloody mindedness.

The concept of convincing each other anything now is largely a moot point anyway, although my eyes have been opened to the apparent pleasures to be gained in interfering in and screwing up other people's lives. Something that I am now eager to try myself at the earliest possible opportunity.

I find London offensive.... maybe I should vote for an increase in congestion charge and an increase in council tax to fund an improbable bid to host the olympics......
Old 17 September 2004, 01:23 PM
  #257  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Someone asked how 250 hours could be spent debating this topic. As far as I can make out this is exactly how.. What a waste of life.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Neil Smalley
ScoobyNet General
30
24 September 2002 02:27 PM
skipjack
Non Scooby Related
6
19 September 2002 05:52 PM
Scoob99
Southern (England)
9
25 June 2001 08:56 AM
Rikki23
Southern (England)
22
29 April 2001 10:28 AM



Quick Reply: Ok, Fox Hunting.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 PM.