Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

miles per gallon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #61  
DBY's Avatar
DBY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Smile

WRX 03 PPP have covered 18k and have averaged 21 mpg over this period. car always gets between 200 to 245 mpg on a full tank. Air con always off,only ever used Optimax, the living daylights are thrashed from the vehicle on a regular basis!!

Anyone getting 30 mpg on a regular basis should change to an Austin Alegro 1500HLE five speed !!! LOL

Regards

John
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #62  
chris's scooby's Avatar
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Default

200- 245 mpg, now that is very impresive...
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 08:27 PM
  #63  
super slider's Avatar
super slider
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Default

Hi
Okay, i can tell you what, with patience, anticipation and a fairly clear motorway, you can get from your standard Subaru WRX (new shape 01). i do log down my mpg's when i fill up(sad but true) but the worse first.....
8 mpg on track
11mpg when trying very very hard to catch up somebody on a meet (lots of 2nd gear use i remember, using full revs, changing down from 3rd at high revs to keep on full boost)
15 when driving very fast on a meet
20 when driving in the slowest group on a meet
20-25 in urban driving depending on how many longish drives
31mpg at 75 mph for 148 miles on motorway
30-35 scenic touring
and........
41.3 driving at 50mph for 172 miles on motorway!
these are fact, not just 'i got xxx miles out of a tank'. these are fill up to fill up. 344 miles is the most i have got out of a tank, that was 31.1 mpg, 11.06 gallons, 50.26 litres.
it can be done. i could prove it to you. any normal imprezza turbo can get over 35mpg
Cheers
Michael
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 08:58 PM
  #64  
paul_f's Avatar
paul_f
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Wink

I want to know where to get one of these "Allegros". . .
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #65  
pflowers's Avatar
pflowers
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Cymru
Default

Originally Posted by DBY
WRX 03 PPP have covered 18k and have averaged 21 mpg over this period. car always gets between 200 to 245 mpg on a full tank. Air con always off,only ever used Optimax, the living daylights are thrashed from the vehicle on a regular basis!!

Anyone getting 30 mpg on a regular basis should change to an Austin Alegro 1500HLE five speed !!! LOL

Regards

John
As I said before I keep my aircon on 24/7, always have at least 60 - 70 kg of work stuff in boot, often wife & kids ( in car not boot !! ) good mix of motorway / A roads / B roads / town. Always drive a fast as I can whilst avoiding speed traps, most of the time the car is giving a good thrashing taking it up to 6 - 7 k through lower gears. Worst mileage before light on - 280, generally allways 300, best ever 340.

Sometimes I use optimax / SUL, only notice difference in running at below 3k, no difference in mpg.

04 WRX no ppp
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 08:49 AM
  #66  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Default

I think somewhat closer to the truth is anyone who isn't getting at least 25mpg - preferably somewhere closer to 30 - on a regular basis (trackdays not included! ) should either get their car looked at, or learn how to drive . You'd be amazed at how much fuel you can save at the same time as driving quickly - and better - by using the dynamics & handling of the car rather than just the accelerator. It's far more amusing as well
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #67  
eyeMAJIC's Avatar
eyeMAJIC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: (=^.^=)
Default

Originally Posted by Neil W
Just filled up and got in 51.13ltrs and covered 250.1 miles. So I calculate that as 18.52mpg Is that correct?
Neil,

I calculate that as 22.24 mpg.

1 imperial gallon (as used in the UK) = 4.54609188 litres.

1 US gallon is smaller (about 3.79 litres)

You've arrived at the figure of 18.52 by converting from litres to US gallons instead of imperial gallons.

Reason to be cheerful now
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 11:13 AM
  #68  
papascooby's Avatar
papascooby
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by nom
I think somewhat closer to the truth is anyone who isn't getting at least 25mpg - preferably somewhere closer to 30 - on a regular basis (trackdays not included! ) should either get their car looked at, or learn how to drive .
well that would appear to be most people on here you've just offended then. If all you do is short journey's 25-30mpg is never ever gonna happen unless you drive like a granny.

Originally Posted by nom
You'd be amazed at how much fuel you can save at the same time as driving quickly - and better - by using the dynamics & handling of the car rather than just the accelerator. It's far more amusing as well
Going round corners faster doesn't use less fuel in my car.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 11:25 AM
  #69  
farmerwrx's Avatar
farmerwrx
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 7
From: Abertillery
Default

just done south wales valleys to edinburgh on 3 tanks averaged about 80 mph had a quater tank left when home fuel light came on with 890 on the trip
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 11:31 AM
  #70  
DBY's Avatar
DBY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Cool

Ive obviously got this Subaru thing wrong, so I'm off to buy a Toyota Prius dual fuel economy car with the optional TTT pack LOL !!!!

Regards

John
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #71  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Default

I'm quite happy to offend people about their driving if they can't drive

Going round corners faster uses less fuel if you use the ability of the car to take as much speed as possible into & through the corner, leading to requiring less power at/past the apex.
Breaking before the corner, dithering through it & slamming your foot to the floor once out the other side is something I'd hope would be grown out of whilest still driving a pantsmobile, or at least should be reserved for things such as an Audi which can't go round corners. The method is slow, clumsy, awkward, makes the driver look like a *** & incidently uses masses of fuel.

If you've bought the car, so you may as well use it properly...
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #72  
wrxmania's Avatar
wrxmania
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 0
From: 1994 WRX STI VERSION 1 No. 21/200
Default

Well said nom,

Brian
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:33 PM
  #73  
papascooby's Avatar
papascooby
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by nom
I'm quite happy to offend people about their driving if they can't drive

Going round corners faster uses less fuel if you use the ability of the car to take as much speed as possible into & through the corner, leading to requiring less power at/past the apex.
Breaking before the corner, dithering through it & slamming your foot to the floor once out the other side is something I'd hope would be grown out of whilest still driving a pantsmobile, or at least should be reserved for things such as an Audi which can't go round corners. The method is slow, clumsy, awkward, makes the driver look like a *** & incidently uses masses of fuel.

If you've bought the car, so you may as well use it properly...
If one is already taking as much speed through the corner as one can, there is no way to reduce the amount of fuel used without reducing throttle. :P

And yes I accept, for corners - I do brake before them and accelerate out of them - I beleive most people (even you) probably do this - my car does not go round corners as fast as it goes in a straight line. (unless you drive at 20 all the time
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:49 PM
  #74  
Matthew's Avatar
Matthew
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Default

Normally 22-24 mpg
On track (at Goodwood) 50litres in 72 miles = 6.5mpg
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #75  
pmarch's Avatar
pmarch
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: URZ - The MadStad
Default

Standard MY01 WRX. Worst average 23MPG; best 29.6MPG (between fillings). Usual is 26/27 when a mix of short journeys and various types of longer distance.

Worst was about 50% mileage on short or urban type journeys.

Best was just shy of 30MPG comprising long drive down A303 then when in Devon/Dorset lots of hills, towns, villages, rural lanes etc. and quite a few fast boost interludes on main roads.

Confident that if I was to do just main road and keep boost to minimum, I could get well over 30MPG.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #76  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Default

I find that the (cornering) limit normally is so far beyond the realms of sensible on-road use (100+ down b-roads may be fun, but is stupid) that anything other than controlled (i.e. not WOT or anywhere near it) acceleration out of corners - except on-track - is largely not needed. I find that overtaking is about the only time I need to use full-power, and then it's rare, as a controlled, flowing movement usually ends up being quicker than having the car squirming around under acceleration when on the wrong side of the road .
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #77  
steve_g's Avatar
steve_g
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Midlands
Default

For those of you who are as sad as me here is a copy of the spreadsheet I keep on my petrol usage:

http://www.stevegreen.f2s.com/Petrolusage.xls

Right click and Save As

I drive an MY03 STi
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #78  
corradoboy's Avatar
corradoboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 19,020
Likes: 0
From: Just beyond the limits of adhesion
Default

Update :-

Last week, drove like a tit just locally, got 220 from 48l = 20.8mpg

This week, had a mway run to Anglesey Circuit, kept under 70 by traffic and then following mate with trailer, 80-90 on return, got 339.5m from 51l = 30.25mpg
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
radave
Subaru Parts
2
Jul 16, 2016 02:19 AM
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
leg200
Subaru Parts
5
Oct 7, 2015 07:31 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
Sep 26, 2015 03:01 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 PM.