The End of Phase 1 ... The beginning of Phase 2
#301
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
erm.. im tired.. but am i missing something?
this is kind of contradicting?? is it not ?
job done.. as that all previous post said
however this wasnt mentioned.. nor did simon do it. comparing like for like..
David
Since that was all that had been changed I reverted as a check. TB is now bypassed again. Readjusted throttle stop, and position sensor, should fix things.
TB is now bypassed again.
however this wasnt mentioned.. nor did simon do it. comparing like for like..
Readjusted throttle stop, and position sensor, should fix things.
#302
Originally Posted by Bob Rawle
Yup you are absolutely right, the matching is terrible, however you mention "tumbler housing", the Sti's don't have those, they use "throttle body" type equivelants without the restrictions. I have no intention of lifting the inlet manifold yet.
cheers
bob
cheers
bob
#303
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
David so what's the point of your post ... sorry if you are unable to follow me, I'm sure Simon did and thats who the post was aimed at.
Conrad ... thats the important bit dealt with then so should work v well .
cheers
bob
Conrad ... thats the important bit dealt with then so should work v well .
cheers
bob
#304
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prodrive LA
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea, I got it thanks. Interesting to "compare and contrast" as always.
I notice the talk about the TGV assemblies, mine has a single manifold (as do all the JDM's i've seen) does your have the empty TGV's like an EU / UK STi?
Cheers
Simon
I notice the talk about the TGV assemblies, mine has a single manifold (as do all the JDM's i've seen) does your have the empty TGV's like an EU / UK STi?
Cheers
Simon
#305
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
No as its a JDM so its "throttle body" style ie plain bores with nothing in there to restrict, with a little bit of head porting to match up the interface they would be a good mod on a wrx if your are swapping to aftermarket management (or even with oem thinking about it)
bob
bob
#306
Simon, Bob, my TGV housings are JDM, there is no butterfly plates(TGV's) but there is a divertor plate down one side of each barrel to force air down there, assume its for low speed running. Can we "not" call them "throttle bodys" its confusing and they are clearly not that, they are TGV housings albeit without the TGV's on the STi's. Just trying to make it clear for those that dont know what we are on about.
#307
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
Conrad there are two types, those you mention and there are those that definately have no internal restriction at all, those are the ones I am discussing. Yours are TGV housings for sure not the STi plain ones. So for clarity I'm not talking about the same thing you are and hence the "throttle body" description cos thats what they are/represent ie plain bored housing that could never accept or be fitted with TGV's.
cheers
bob
cheers
bob
#308
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
bob,
You said "Readjusted throttle stop, and position sensor"
RE-ADJUSTED.. means you adjusted prior.. you simply said you had removed the water feed.. now was it your adjusting or the water feed that cocked up the cold start?
David
You said "Readjusted throttle stop, and position sensor"
RE-ADJUSTED.. means you adjusted prior.. you simply said you had removed the water feed.. now was it your adjusting or the water feed that cocked up the cold start?
David
#309
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
Neither since I didn't/don't have a problem with cold start just engine drop out as I came up to a junction semi cold ie after about 4 miles driving in traffic, thats what I posted about.
Since that was what I had just changed I reverted it, not relevent though, suspected lambda and /or maf ... neither of those. Since Subaru adjust the throttle stop at the factory I re-adjusted it to my own satisfaction as a double check (known issue in UK) but nothing wrong there.
In fact its an interesting issue relating to map settings and sensor scaling which, now identified, is providing useful insight.
Not related to anything other than map settings afaict. I've cured the engine drop, that was relatively easy, now investigating over run to closed loop transtion.
cheers
bob
Since that was what I had just changed I reverted it, not relevent though, suspected lambda and /or maf ... neither of those. Since Subaru adjust the throttle stop at the factory I re-adjusted it to my own satisfaction as a double check (known issue in UK) but nothing wrong there.
In fact its an interesting issue relating to map settings and sensor scaling which, now identified, is providing useful insight.
Not related to anything other than map settings afaict. I've cured the engine drop, that was relatively easy, now investigating over run to closed loop transtion.
cheers
bob
#310
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prodrive LA
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Rawle
Conrad there are two types, those you mention and there are those that definately have no internal restriction at all, those are the ones I am discussing. Yours are TGV housings for sure not the STi plain ones. So for clarity I'm not talking about the same thing you are and hence the "throttle body" description cos thats what they are/represent ie plain bored housing that could never accept or be fitted with TGV's.
cheers
bob
cheers
bob
Cheers
Simon
#311
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
simon, dont know whether you mailed my home account.. lost a few emails as my mail server started loosing mails.. so lost about 4 days worth
#315
back to the twin scroll turbos
Wonder if it is really worth, for hillclimbing / sprint applications to have the twin scroll setup (header, uppipe, turbo, etc.) fitted on an older GC8 STi ? ..... the amount of torque at 3300rpm is unbelievable.
Carlos H.
Wonder if it is really worth, for hillclimbing / sprint applications to have the twin scroll setup (header, uppipe, turbo, etc.) fitted on an older GC8 STi ? ..... the amount of torque at 3300rpm is unbelievable.
Carlos H.
#322
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I mapped a Euro spec GT with a full twin scroll set-up - nice solid wall of torque, but not *that* special higher up the range. Maybe it needs the STi heads?
#323
Originally Posted by dowser
I mapped a Euro spec GT with a full twin scroll set-up - nice solid wall of torque, but not *that* special higher up the range. Maybe it needs the STi heads?
Carlos H.
#325
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
Hi RB, yes she's still around, currently the subject of an excersise to match performance gained using aftermarket ecu's using the factory item.
cheers
bob
cheers
bob
#326
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
Following the recent hot weather and having had to make several lengthy drives that included some varied driving thought some more temp info might be of use.
With this airpipe that I now have fitted things have changed significantly, cruising charge is always within 2 degrees of ambient (usually just one) and intake temp as indicated by maf is within three, so huge improvement there, on hard loads charge rises no more than 16 degrees, thats from hot ambients of 32/34 and included after a very hard third/fourth/fifth to over 7500 in each (came across a Griffith, least thats what it looked like in the rear view mirror after I passed him). Temps recover immediately to with 5 degrees of cruise temp and drop back that level within a further minute.
Further more, the car was mapped so that it could get "just sparkly" if pushed really hard at 7k plus, normally ok but provokable, now I get zilch, no activity at all, so much so I thought the knocklink was dead ... nope works just fine, so, scope for more timing but not until the turbo gets sorted, I think I have decided what to do there but will take maybe a coupe of months to implement. So if you can stand the drainpipe look then this is a very good upgrade, I have removed the undertray as well so that opens out the rear of the engine bay and allows better airflow through. Coolant temps are running 5 degrees coolewr as the norm and oil temp maybe 6 degrees cooler as the norm, before I could achieve 110 ish when pushing on, now no more that 104/105.
bob
With this airpipe that I now have fitted things have changed significantly, cruising charge is always within 2 degrees of ambient (usually just one) and intake temp as indicated by maf is within three, so huge improvement there, on hard loads charge rises no more than 16 degrees, thats from hot ambients of 32/34 and included after a very hard third/fourth/fifth to over 7500 in each (came across a Griffith, least thats what it looked like in the rear view mirror after I passed him). Temps recover immediately to with 5 degrees of cruise temp and drop back that level within a further minute.
Further more, the car was mapped so that it could get "just sparkly" if pushed really hard at 7k plus, normally ok but provokable, now I get zilch, no activity at all, so much so I thought the knocklink was dead ... nope works just fine, so, scope for more timing but not until the turbo gets sorted, I think I have decided what to do there but will take maybe a coupe of months to implement. So if you can stand the drainpipe look then this is a very good upgrade, I have removed the undertray as well so that opens out the rear of the engine bay and allows better airflow through. Coolant temps are running 5 degrees coolewr as the norm and oil temp maybe 6 degrees cooler as the norm, before I could achieve 110 ish when pushing on, now no more that 104/105.
bob
#327
how about a set of these on the front to cover the air intake
http://store.vividracing.com/catalog...7d778c4ddb047f
http://store.vividracing.com/catalog...7d778c4ddb047f
#329
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
Conrad here you are, I know I can open out by removing inner wing metal but leaving as is for now
fuz the foglight surrounds I used are available ready painted from Subaru at a cost of £32 a pair. Its not a hardship to fabricate a stainless mesh cover to tidy it up and keep the vermin out.
cheers
bob
fuz the foglight surrounds I used are available ready painted from Subaru at a cost of £32 a pair. Its not a hardship to fabricate a stainless mesh cover to tidy it up and keep the vermin out.
cheers
bob
#330
Ecu Specialist
Thread Starter
By the way for info the problem I was having with the very light throttle is resolved by careful mapping around the maf scaling but I had damaged the front lambda when removing the heat shielding and getting enthusiastic with a hammer (don't ask) so a word of warning DO NOT shock these sensors, it actually looked as though there was nothing wrong with it but was running the car slightly rich biased all the time, new one sourced from japan and everything back as it should be so throttle body heating removed once again.
bob
bob