Is Scoobynet Homophobic?
25 July 2003, 10:38 PM
#64
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: www.mrcookie.co.uk
Posts: 5,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh and do you really care if some bloke fancies ya, personally i'd take it as a complement , i'd be gutted that the only person that fancied me in the world wasn't the right sex for me but win some lose some 
Si
Si
26 July 2003, 10:49 AM
#65
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its not religion which causes the trouble, its the fanatics who go over the top and are not actually following religious teachings.
Otherwise I think Listy is not far off the mark. Its not really necessary to bring religion into this thread anyway. We are discussing unnatural behaviour. I am not frightened of homosexuals at all,let them get on with it if they want and don't go chasing young people. But I still can't help feeling that anyone who has to get his kicks by using someone's anus has not got that much to write home about!
Les
Otherwise I think Listy is not far off the mark. Its not really necessary to bring religion into this thread anyway. We are discussing unnatural behaviour. I am not frightened of homosexuals at all,let them get on with it if they want and don't go chasing young people. But I still can't help feeling that anyone who has to get his kicks by using someone's anus has not got that much to write home about!
Les
26 July 2003, 08:47 PM
#68
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You seriously expecting a gay man or woman to actually post up on this thread? I think not, don't think they'd open them up to some of the prejudiced views some small minded people have.
OK, I can't judge, but well, tis the feeling I have. Same goes for anything that's against the norm. If you don't fit the "normal" mould then you're an outcast and subject to torment and ridicule. But who decides what is and is not normal? There's the the rub!
OK, I can't judge, but well, tis the feeling I have. Same goes for anything that's against the norm. If you don't fit the "normal" mould then you're an outcast and subject to torment and ridicule. But who decides what is and is not normal? There's the the rub!
28 July 2003, 01:49 PM
#70
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Me? Get some confidence? Rape me? Whatever. You know nothing about me.
As I (tried to) say in my mail I DON'T CARE what people do with their orifices. Not "I think gay people are an abomination" nor "I think gay people are wonderful." but "I don't care". They are people who are living their life as they want to; so long as we all get on with our all too short lives that is fine.
The only thing that irriatates me is when all hetero men are criticised for the possibility of feeling slightly uncomfortable in certain circumstances when members of more politically correct demographics are supported for expressing the same feelings.
I'm guessing that your lesbian friend would take serious issue with someone saying "all lesbians are just waiting for the right man to convert them back to the straight and narrow". I would agree with her that such a ludicrous generalisation is bollox.
All I am doing is taking issue with what she said on the same principle.
As I (tried to) say in my mail I DON'T CARE what people do with their orifices. Not "I think gay people are an abomination" nor "I think gay people are wonderful." but "I don't care". They are people who are living their life as they want to; so long as we all get on with our all too short lives that is fine.
The only thing that irriatates me is when all hetero men are criticised for the possibility of feeling slightly uncomfortable in certain circumstances when members of more politically correct demographics are supported for expressing the same feelings.
I'm guessing that your lesbian friend would take serious issue with someone saying "all lesbians are just waiting for the right man to convert them back to the straight and narrow". I would agree with her that such a ludicrous generalisation is bollox.
All I am doing is taking issue with what she said on the same principle.
28 July 2003, 02:11 PM
#71
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got a chance to add a bit more!!!
FYI I would tend to agree with what your mate says in a lot of cases. I just find it fu*king irritating that most people would find it perfectly ok for her to state such a massive generalisation when you or I try and say something similar and WALLOP, we get it in the neck.
PC me? Hmmm.
FYI I would tend to agree with what your mate says in a lot of cases. I just find it fu*king irritating that most people would find it perfectly ok for her to state such a massive generalisation when you or I try and say something similar and WALLOP, we get it in the neck.
PC me? Hmmm.
28 July 2003, 05:10 PM
#74
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I think it went like this.
Man ***** monkey.
Man ***** woman.
Woman ***** man.
and repeat, and sometime later...............
Promiscuous gay man put his manhood in lots of other mans bottoms
Hey presto!
ID - the doc has spoken
Man ***** monkey.
Man ***** woman.
Woman ***** man.
and repeat, and sometime later...............
Promiscuous gay man put his manhood in lots of other mans bottoms
Hey presto!
ID - the doc has spoken
