Scoob vs Integra Type R running costs
14 April 2003, 01:44 PM
#31
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
standard ITR's run far too lean stock. Fit an air/fuel controller to lean it out and you will be very surprised just how much fuel you can save.
Our 210bhp ITR makes 280 miles to £30 of Optimimax, and our VTEC point is set at 4.4k rpm, so we are constantly "in the zone" as some of you put it
Regards,
Michael
standard ITR's run far too lean stock. Fit an air/fuel controller to lean it out and you will be very surprised just how much fuel you can save.
Our 210bhp ITR makes 280 miles to £30 of Optimimax, and our VTEC point is set at 4.4k rpm, so we are constantly "in the zone" as some of you put it
Regards,
Michael
15 April 2003, 12:59 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ITR's are brilliant. Far more fun than a uk impreza. Mine seemed to do 30mpg no matter how I drove. My 1st service @ 9k cost £76 at the dealers.
If I didn't require 4 doors I'd sell the scoob and buy another.
biggest cost is tyres every 6>8k!
If I didn't require 4 doors I'd sell the scoob and buy another.
biggest cost is tyres every 6>8k!
15 April 2003, 02:24 PM
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nearly bought one of these, what is the performance like.
People range from 6 to 7 secs 0-60, was is it off your experiences
Are they quicker than scoobies through the range.
Also what mods give you what bhp
just curious of how good these are.
cheers for replies.
People range from 6 to 7 secs 0-60, was is it off your experiences
Are they quicker than scoobies through the range.
Also what mods give you what bhp
just curious of how good these are.
cheers for replies.
15 April 2003, 02:35 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
previous generation ITR figures:
0 to 60 appx 6.5 (purely a traction issue)
0 to 100 appx 16 - 16.2
so 60 to 100 in less time than standard bugeye, about the same as blobeye and slightly less than classic.
bugger all on the road,really
D
0 to 60 appx 6.5 (purely a traction issue)
0 to 100 appx 16 - 16.2
so 60 to 100 in less time than standard bugeye, about the same as blobeye and slightly less than classic.
bugger all on the road,really
D
15 April 2003, 02:48 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
R888MYP what mods have you done, as just setting the VTEC cut in point at 4400 will do next to nothing, unless you have it mapped, and the extensive time we spent mapping my old car proved that having a lower VTEC point made the power very flat, so peak power dropped losing the nature of the VTEC.
210BHP is quite high for an DC2, Manifold, Exhaust, De-cat, ECU, Cams, valvetrain?
Modding the B-Series engine is very expensive, and few quick big gains, handling and brakes are the main development area.
210BHP is quite high for an DC2, Manifold, Exhaust, De-cat, ECU, Cams, valvetrain?
Modding the B-Series engine is very expensive, and few quick big gains, handling and brakes are the main development area.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Uncle Creepy
Other Marques
43
27 December 2015 04:02 PM
