When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Computer & Technology RelatedPost here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.
eh? its already been discussed. Parent's X hacked unintentionally by their child and another vid of 2 brothers i think doing the same. Yea really secure that.
It wasn’t really hacked though was it, if you actually read the whole article it required a very specific set of circumstances to confuse the facial recognition system. When she’s reset it in a well lit room they couldn’t repeat them “hack”.
Exactly not even a proper hack just bypassed lol, really not secure or very good is it Neil, which is the point. How can you not acknowledge that? you must be a deluded isheep too afterall.
Last edited by bioforger; Nov 26, 2017 at 02:01 PM.
There we go, seen a video on YouTube must be insecure. Meanwhile has a fingerprint scanner and a four digit passcode... on an Android device, probably rooted.
Laughable. Waiting for your other account to sign in an rant out the same videos.
You're a joke. Fingerprint scan is way more secure than the **** that is faceid which doesn't even protect you from your own family members or someone who has a similar face
Exactly not even a proper hack just bypassed lol, really not secure or very good is it Neil, which is the point. How can you not acknowledge that? you must be a deluded isheep too afterall.
If anyone is deluded it’s you and your fandroid buddy TP. The probability of that “hack” working is so low the the family in that article couldn’t even reproduce it without replicating the exact scenario required in the first place. Yet in your funny little world that makes it massively insecure.
You're a joke. Fingerprint scan is way more secure than the **** that is faceid which doesn't even protect you from your own family members or someone who has a similar face
And wrong never been rooted either.
****.
How many FaceID devices sold? How many suspect videos, identical twins, I’ll accept, now have a think. Tell you what I’ll give you a clue, that advertising company who’s operating system you use, they have another revenue generator called... Google. Search for video showing breaches of fingerprint scanners, search Android because that affects you. Tell me again, what’s more secure 100 ID points or 1000? What about if you could add other elements to the 1000, like only open eyes, only when not under duress. That’s multiples of 1000 compared to 100, still more secure?
Moving on, don’t focus on FaceID for opening your phone, think of the animated poo 💩 see any future uses there, portrait mode, think it might help take a better picture? 2 years and you’ll have it, and love it.
If anyone is deluded it’s you and your fandroid buddy TP. The probability of that “hack” working is so low the the family in that article couldn’t even reproduce it without replicating the exact scenario required in the first place. Yet in your funny little world that makes it massively insecure.
You're a **** too and probably would like to suck JC's, the point is it was possible, there's nothing more to say.
Still no picture just a load of tripe, still believes I only recorded 5mb because of my device. Why do you do it to yourself time and again, you must love looking like a complete ******.
What’s your data allowance? Mine is 8gb. Know how long that would take to use at your theoretical speeds, of course you don’t, you just see a big number and think it’s great, what a dick.
It might be useful in a few years when we all have access to those speeds and unlimited downloads, right now it's a chocolate teapot hence the reason there's no rush for support. Dimwits like TP just see a bigger number and think it's better, that's why Samsung skipped a few numbers to keep up with the iPhone, can't have a Samsung 7 and an iPhone 8, 8's bigger so perceived by the easily led to be better.
Not sure about Frapple but the note 8 can handle files very large in size whether video or photos etc, so of course it's nice to be able to share these on your NAS or cloud as fast as possible.
If on the other hand you have an iPhone 8 you probably are stuck in the stone age.
5Mb lol
You're an idiot if you're using your data allowance to transfer huge files, fast or not.
20mb today, amazing how the iPhone self heals when you move it near a window, got to love Apple for tech like that.
There are things called WiFi and most people have ample data allowance in the year 2017, then again for primitive iPhones you probably don't need much of an allowance at all as you clearly are limited to sending some emojis it seems.
The iPhones are so far behind the times it's funny, what's even more funny is the shiite they send to gullible people in marketing.
To save anyone having to visit the link, here's the pie "TechInsights previously analyzed the Broadcom BCM4361 wireless combo SoC when we found it in our Samsung Galaxy S8 analyses."
Last edited by JackClark; Dec 8, 2017 at 02:03 PM.
Your point, apprentice?
The iPhone still is shiiite. You don't need to tell me what a System on Chip is they are nothing new, what is definitely not new is iPhones struggle to keep up the pace of high end androids.
When iPhones decide to implement MIMO and improve LTE speeds Jack and yourself might get greater than 5mb speeds, until then get more training to reach the levels of the master.
iPhones suck.
Always have and always will.
Is that your way of saying "Oh sorry, my lack of technical knowledge is showing and I've been basing my comments on false assumptions" or are you just squirming you *****.
oh for **** sake, just as I thought this place had calmed down again.
