IdonthaveaScooby

We no longer have colonies to remove these people to

no matter what they tell you


theres no official ways to apply from all the places we ,as USA's bitch , have destroyed


of course

JackClark

It might be time for a real life intervention, can you pm me with some family contacts? There are people that care for you, it's been months now and nobody has 'got' you, help is available.

IdonthaveaScooby

When did we start broadcasting to PBS America

IdonthaveaScooby

The home secretary has even said its illegal

IdonthaveaScooby

I bet the powers that be end Linekers career for speaking the truth , same as Corbyn


king disgraceful , but we expect nothing else

IdonthaveaScooby

Another sucker punch just like Brexit , false premise for votes - the public will likely lap up this ****

JackClark

You're alone, in a cold room, talking to yourself. Help is available.

IdonthaveaScooby

Sunak has already made this his election pledge !

BMWhere?

Lineker was absolutely right in what he said. The anti-immigration rhetoric coming out of the Tory party right now does sound like Germany in the early 30's. Its not yet ****-ism, but its heading in that direction.

They can't blame the EU any more for their failings, so next step is to blame the immigrants and then to demonise the Judiciary for ruling the policies, that clearly break international law, illegal.

Immigrants are invaders, judges are enemies of the people! Migrant hotels are already being attacked! What's the next step?

ALi-B

iTrader: (1)

What I find an utter travesty in all this, is we have politicians (who aren't in charge), pundits, journos and celebrities sticking their oar in with this, saying it is terrible that people are risking their lives to get to UK in inflatable boats or in the backs of sealed HGVs. Blaming traffickers and going further to say the conditions they are held in the UK by appointed officials are terrible, and they are also against them being hosted in hotels.

Fine.

But what alternative solution do they propose?

I find it so frustrating that I have not heard any shadow MP come with a solution to this.

The best they come up with is to "tackle the traffickers", but not says how, nor how are we supposed to enforce UK law in Eastern Europe or North Africa. How exactly do our police to surveil, arrest and prosecute a trafficker in say, Albania? News sources say we have successful international operations working with other countries to tackle this...yet still they operate.

So rather than take easy shots at whatever Tory is in charge, how about they come up with a solution. Budgeted. Resourced. And their overall plan for migrant protection and integration into the UK. Where and how they will be housed (during a shortage of council homes) , what provisions will be given (when benefits don't cover food costs and people resort to food banks), their medical care (in oversubscribed GP practices and overstretched hospital with staff striking over conditions). How do we monitor them to make sure they don't 'disappear' from the system or fall victim to the black market labour trade or slave/exploited work. How do we support them or help them integrate when social services aren't equipped to do so? How do we ensure we monitor minimise terrorism risk? Or indeed any risk from those wishing to cause harm.

These are answers that the public wants. If Lineker was in charge, what would he do to address this?

Wurzel

iTrader: (1)

To a certain exstent the government are right, there is no way any asylum seeker should make it to UK shores in a rubber boat, the UK is surrounded on all sides by safe countries that people can claim asylum in. Sometimes they are passing through multiple safe countries to get to Calais beaches. Also if they can afford to pay people smugglers thousands of pounds why can they not just get a ferry or a flight to the UK and claim asylum properly?

markjmd

iTrader: (11)

To answer the last two posts, the proposed solutions that I've read about would all essentially involve setting up legal routes/methods for people wanting to come to the UK to apply for asylum from a distance, ie either at off-shore centres in other European countries (or even further afield), or via consular facilities or similar. The reasons why none of this is ever spoken about publicly in Westminster? Number 1, the big parties are too scared of the public backlash ("deliberately help people get over here - what would the Mail/Express/Telegraph think??"), and number 2, it would cost too much in money, organizational talent and cross-border cooperation than our present govt is willing or able to muster.

Realistically though, I have to agree. If those people really are that desparate to get here, which they very much appear to be, you will never stop them from trying via rubber boats or other unsafe/illegal means unless you offer them some alternative.

IdonthaveaScooby

These proposed legal routes should have been there long time ago , if you are an African asylum seeker eg - There is NO way of applying

The proposed legal routes are timed for AFTER they want to make it illegal to turn up without papers ...!

so its bull

markjmd

iTrader: (11)

I'm guessing the part of my post that said "The reasons why none of this is ever spoken about publicly in Westminster" went clear over your head, didn't it?

IdonthaveaScooby

The Only way to stop these people coming is to stop screwing up the economies of the places they are coming from

that entails stopping being usa’s bitch

IdonthaveaScooby

... And there he goes , probably at some zionists insistence

markjmd

iTrader: (11)

Yaaaaawn. Why don't you just change your user-name to "Ihatethegreatsatan" and be done with it? It would save everybody a lot of time.

IdonthaveaScooby

Thank goodness we Do have some people with their heads screwed on

BMWhere?

Brexit Benefits!
GM crops are legalised in England - man playing God with potentially disastrous consequences! Once again, the UK putting profits before common sense! Naturally, there will be no product labelling requirement, so the public don't know what's GM or not and can't vote with their wallets!

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-64596453

IdonthaveaScooby

Theyve managed this in Kenya , what it actually means is that the poor farmer HAS to buy seed off the supplier and go into debt

https://www.greenpeace.org/africa/en...gnty-in-kenya/


So far Zimbabwe has told imperialists to f'off

IdonthaveaScooby

Brexit covid Ukraine - all a means subjugating the masses


Gates and bezoz now the biggest ‘ farmers’ in the states

BMWhere?

You realise your constant crazy ramblings only succeeds in nullifying legitimate arguments!

IdonthaveaScooby

The average person will be living off gm cheap meat imports

Personally I’m not crazy for this kind of future

Norman Dog

iTrader: (1)

I bet he REALLY hasn't even got a Scooby either.

IdonthaveaScooby

US trying to force world to handicap China , and Russia

meanwhile membership is worth a whopping 8 pence to each and every one of us

never mind the 4 quid we lost in quitting the eu

https://cjil.uchicago.edu/print-arch...national-trade

IdonthaveaScooby

There goes the rest the uk car industry

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-65612295

RobsyUK

iTrader: (2)

the cars they produce are crap anyway. It'll make way for more migrants.

IdonthaveaScooby

These people are going to suddenly get new jobs in AI …?

BMWhere?

So, you voted for Brexit to cut down immigration!

Now we have record immigration numbers for the last two years - only now they're not white Christians coming from Europe, they're brown non-Christians coming from all over the place!

So how's the Brexit that you voted for working out for you?

Wurzel

iTrader: (1)

Alastair, it is not right to mock the afflicted