Gary , Iv had word with your boss

He's not happy

Be prepared for tap on shoulder possible punitive treatment for wasting everyone's time

 

The boss has been in , to cut a long story short he advised my time would be better spent studying how princess di was clearly killed in a ritualistic murder , something to do with black swans and ancient ritual sites and numbers of coloums

 

 

this is an interesting little article - it happens to be on the "Chemtrail" conspiracy, but in the context of the article (and this thread) it could be any daft theory that defies simple logic and physics

https://www.ncscooper.com/area-chemt...by-math-thugs/


“These two guys kept asking me for proof,” said an indignant and self-righteous Ms. McAlister in an interview at her Rhode Island Street home. “So I said, ‘well just look at the picture. It’s all there.’ But that wasn’t enough, so I shared a bunch of YouTube videos and a dozen links from geoengineeringwatch.org. That didn’t work, so I just started calling everyone a thug.”


sound familiar!!!

the comments are also v interesting - Russ Tanner is a prime mover of the "chemtrail" theory, and he simply comes over as both evasive and clueless

 

I believe in Chemtrails and can prove it.

 

Presumably the chemtrails from Easyjet planes is a mix of cheap lager, ***.s, farts and Lynx Africa. BA plane chemtrails are white wine, real wood burners, old spice.

 

That and chemicals expected from burning fuel, Chemtrails are real!!

 

Prrof that F1 cars are fitted with small gas canisters filled with a sinister substance. Theorists believe the gas causes anyone who inhales it to immediately purchase Sky TV and start praying to a small effigy of Bernie

 

...

 

I like to imagine hodgy is sat upon a large horse while he has his say

 

Bernie's definitely reptilian. Definitely.

 

lol,

 

You cant be googling correctly

 

Fantastic. Nope, I never inferred that in any sense. You're doing what you have been doing with everything, seeing things that are not there. Good work, detective Gary.

I've had better 'discussions', with the CIA via my fillings. At least they told me who assassinated JFK. Jeez!

 

good find

and you can clearly see the east penthouse that collapses through the building - about 4 secs before the outer walls fall down

the missing 4 sec from all the reality denier videos

 

Indeed ,good video .

I know you'll hate this but no flames visable and you can see a lot of Windows through that smoke and around the other corner ,

It would be interesting to know how many hours or minutes before collapse that was filmed.

Thinking out loud and open to suggestions or facts if anyone has them , the building was on fire from top to bottom , is that believed by all , and if so how does it explain no fires or smoke seen from the other side in the collapse video , I understood the fires were only on lower floors below the 20th I think , where the sprinkler system wasn't working , above that it wasn't fed by the mains but massive tanks on top floor , it also bothers me that the helicopters weren't around to film the collapse , I understand maybe it was to dandgerous

At this point I'm now taking the position of devils advocate

 

Fair enough , I've no idea what you inferred or ment then

 

You can prove you believe in something?

 

Nope, planes definitely leave a trail of chemicals in the air. Fact.

 

I think you may have missed the point a bit there, Jack.....

 

https://fightersweep.com/4955/pilot-...th-chemtrails/

 

lol, this problem is most believers won't read past the headline and the first paragraph


although if they do they maybe swayed by some of the sciency stuff

"So what’s in chemtrails?

Some Carbon Monoxide and heavy doses of Dihydrogen Monoxide. That’s right, folks. Two parts hydrogen, one part oxygen. You read right, that’s twice as much hydrogen as oxygen being sprayed on the unsuspecting masses below. It doesn’t get any more sinister than that."

indeed - exhaust gasses and simple water

 

The whole argument and proof of there argument relies on seeing contrails when the weather dictates they can't be formed , I'm no genius but it would make sense to only spray chemtrails when the weather dictates contrails would be visable ,

Now assuming the alleged people that perform chemtrails are clever I think they would have worked this out ,

So assuming they wouldn't spray chemicals when they would be easy to identify how can there ever be evidence of them

 

I flew from RAF Brize Norton to RAF Mount Pleasant in the Falklands, it took 18 hours and we had to stop at a base on Ascension to refuel.

I couldn't understand why it took so long considering it was downhill all the way but now I know the earth is flat it makes perfect sense

 

 

Big respect to you as well by the way

 

Probably a good idea to read the whole article. Get to the bit about spraying 'chemtrails' 6 miles up...

 

I did read it all , you are referring to the part where he points out spraying chemicals 6miles up in the air would be a waste of time ,

Why is that relevant to what I said ?

 

Well, maybe it's because your writing is difficult to decipher but you were talking about evidence of contrails/chemtrails etc. etc. and the sprayers would probably be smart enough to only spray chemtrails that there would be no evidence of, right? So the over-riding factor in all of that is that, evidence or not, it would be pointless to spray 6 miles up, making your point itself moot.

 

Conclusive evidence the US are cloaking their ships...