Second paragraph and see the pictures above, they're not new you were looking on sites that don't want you to see them.

What proof do you want? There were no explosives, the building was on fire, had a 20 story hole in it and a two buildings weighing millions of tons pounded the ground next to it. It fell down, why does that need any more proof.

 

agreed, and something you have in common with the OP

but all the line of evidence from multiple sources points to the earth being round and WT7 being fatally damaged by fires and debris and succumbing to a gravity led collapse

anything is possible, but that fails as a scientific hypothesis without evidence

 

I'd like to see something like these









Of coarse none of those buildings fires were bad enough to cause the building to collapse entirely but you get the point .

I also had to see the Lord of the dance to believe it .

The reporters must of kicked themselves for not staying around a bit longer I guess

 

First result for Fire WT7

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-wt...complex.t1804/

 

You missed the point of the pictures , I was asked what I'd like as proof , I showed examples of building fires to demonstrate what I expect the fully involved fire at wtc to look like, we all know it never looked anything like those fires , or there would be pictures , I find it difficult to imagine what the fires must of been like to cause such damage but remain out of sight

 

I showed you a page where you can find out why you didn't see fire like you showed in the pictures, it's very well explained. Take a quick look up at your pictures if you can't be bothered to read, the outside of the building is on fire.

 

Most of the eyewitneses were fire fighters and most described it as, the building was fully involved in fire , something like that , it's obviously firefighter talk , I'd just liked to have seen how that looked , I'm guessing the reporters were there alongside the fire fighters up to the point it was clear it was going to collapse , so pictures or videos of that moment would be good to see

 

Yes I read that , so the wtc7 fire stayed far enough away from the Windows , okay , that makes sense

 

the problem with all conspiracy theorists and science deniers is that they ultimately take the view that unless THEY are personally convinced - to THEIR satisfaction then it is all a hoax


so 911 twoothers want it all proved by "models" however the basic physics of the Square-cube law, amongst other things, determines that this is not possible

anti-evolutionists want to see a monkey giving birth to a human - again wont happen

climate change/science deniers want to release a molecule of C02 into the atmosphere and then run to a thermometer and record a temperature rise

the above "impossible proof" complete with a basic misunderstanding of the underlying science and it is a toxic mix

 

And if you think I think I'm proving anything. I don't

 

I read the first line and thought blah blah blah , bored of hearing it

 

yes you carry searching for the truth by endlessly trawling conspiracy and disinformation sites

like I said pages and pages ago - you have the answers but you simply stick your fingers in your ear and go "blah blah blah"

honestly you are a joke

 

Skyscraper fires??? WTF.
Slightly off topic.

 

You think I've been trying to find the truth , that is a joke

 

Don't take things so seriously , remember why you came into this thread

 

Never argue with a fool

 

or a Conspiritard.

 

Thanks for the conversation

 

Is this thread still going? Blimey !!!!

If the earth was flat, I think we'd know. And if it was, why would it be a secret? Incase we all decided to sail to the edge to see what's over the edge, and tip the place over?

 

Sorry that was a bit harsh, you're not a full on conspiritard... yet.

 

Nah, it wouldn't tip over unless everyone lined up on one edge and jumped up and down in unison. Then we'd really be in trouble

 

Ask Gary, he's got all the answers and isn't looking for proof. Then again, he wants us to all go and look for the answers....wait....what ...as mentioned above, never argue with a fool

 

if people haven't read the thread that might actually be believed , tosser

 

Just watched the video with the Orange glowy bits coming out the Windows , I've seen the pictures of that exact scene , I wonder how long before it collapsed that they were taken , how much worse did it get

 

Hahaha! You are a riot! That makes zero sense in response to my post. Not a lot rattling around in there alongside the conspiracy theories, is there? You're a wee treasure, aren't you.

 

Okay , so what answers have I given to what questions ? and proof of what ? What did I say that needs proof ? And what do I want you to find the answer to?

Your comment about me paints a picture of somebody that thinks they know the truth and that the truth is far fetched and based on facts I have given no proof of .

What I've actually been doing is trying to have a conversation about a couple of the unusual circumstances ,

I could have a conversation about the no plane theory , would that mean I believe it to be a fact ?

I could have the discussion on the side of the no planers but it would really only be playing devils advocate , unfortunately the conversation would end with ridicule and people claiming that I believe it to be true

 

So are you saying that you believe that WT7 did fall down due to two planes crashing into two skyscrapers next door?

 

I don't think I'm the one that has lost sight of the original thread theme.

 

My view is , and has always been that it probably was ,to give a more accurate view I'd say 85% nists explanation and 15% conspiracy ,

I find it fun to have a discussion on the side of conspiracy up to the point it descends in ridicule and people painting an untrue picture of me ,

The no planer theory I give 0.01 % chance , and a 100% chance I'd be label a nut for putting any kind of debate forward

 

For me the theme of the thread was outlandish claims , it was a bit of fun to start with, I did attempt to get a few discussions going it made me laugh at some points , I also wanted to see how many pages this could stretch to