View Poll Results: How will you vote in the EU referendum?
Voters: 255. You may not vote on this poll
EU Referendum
I also find it amusing how the remain campaign state as if it were fact that being outside of the EU means certain economic death. Let me see now how are Switzerland, Norway and Iceland doing? Hmm they really look to be suffering don't they?
Last edited by An0n0m0us; Jun 22, 2016 at 03:09 PM.
No, sir. I certainly wouldn't charge the late, great Tony Benn with having a 'little Englander' mentality, nor would I describe him as myopic, but his position would barely be understood by the majority of the electorate. It may not be popular to say, but I'm afraid the average man and woman in the street is being hoodwinked in to an out vote by dark souls who desire power and whose philosophies and motivations are shady. You've yet to lay out your case (you've merely criticised, with outcome bias, the tone of the debate), so if the cap fits...
No, sir. I certainly wouldn't charge the late, great Tony Benn with having a 'little Englander' mentality, nor would I describe him as myopic, but his position would barely be understood by the majority of the electorate. It may not be popular to say, but I'm afraid the average man and woman in the street is being hoodwinked in to an out vote by dark souls who desire power and whose philosophies and motivations are shady. You've yet to lay out your case (you've merely criticised, with outcome bias, the tone of the debate), so if the cap fits...
And i've also explained why I shan't bother to lay out my reasons because anything other than what the remain camp agree with is mocked and insulted. Reasoned debate is beyond the mentality of the majority of the remain camp certainly on Scoobynet as clearly demonstrated in this thread.
On the 30th of June the EU is supposedly to announce the talks for Turkey to enter the EU. Now if remain wins, you can then ask Mr. Cameron why he refused to say he would use the veto?
https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/31896584/eu-turkey-to-open-new-membership-talks-sources/#page1
Plus nearly half of Cameron business advisers did sign not up to remain advice
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/22/almost-half-of-david-camerons-business-advisory-group-fails-to-s/
https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/31896584/eu-turkey-to-open-new-membership-talks-sources/#page1
Plus nearly half of Cameron business advisers did sign not up to remain advice
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/22/almost-half-of-david-camerons-business-advisory-group-fails-to-s/
Turkey an extrordinarily important country right now and a NATO ally.
Would you want our PM damaging that key relationship on an issue he's never going to have preside over?
As I said nearly a fortnight ago, I think most people have now made up their minds and this is simply bickering now back and forth. The arguments on both sides have been aired and discussed, decisions made. It seems pretty fruitless now, just arguing on the internet. Friday morning is the moment, bring it on.... and vote for freedom, VOTE LEAVE
What was the PM supposed to do when confronted by the question about vetoing Turkish membership. Is he supposed to abandon reason for a soundbite?
Turkey an extrordinarily important country right now and a NATO ally.
Would you want our PM damaging that key relationship on an issue he's never going to have preside over?
Turkey an extrordinarily important country right now and a NATO ally.
Would you want our PM damaging that key relationship on an issue he's never going to have preside over?
As I said nearly a fortnight ago, I think most people have now made up their minds and this is simply bickering now back and forth. The arguments on both sides have been aired and discussed, decisions made. It seems pretty fruitless now, just arguing on the internet. Friday morning is the moment, bring it on.... and vote for freedom, VOTE LEAVE
Sorry and one final news story (not the Calais riots of course!)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36596060
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36596060
Sorry and one final news story (not the Calais riots of course!)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36596060
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36596060
Well the day is finally here and so like the image goes I am out , both in the vote and this thread.
Enjoy your vote tomorrow, make it count and I shall revisit this thread maybe Friday
Could quite easily be replaced with - vote for much of the same as we've had since joining the EU such as ridiculous laws enforced upon us by Brussels, an open door to the rest of Europe allowing for the abuse of the UK benefit system through benefit tourism, a huge strain on our public services due to the open door policy and vast amounts of money paid to the EU that could be better spent on public services within the UK.
Does anyone know if it is his power for boris to give amnesty on illegals any time soon , if he wins ?
Cos may be good move
Cos may be good move
Last edited by dpb; Jun 22, 2016 at 04:41 PM.
Could quite easily be replaced with - vote for much of the same as we've had since joining the EU such as ridiculous laws enforced upon us by Brussels, an open door to the rest of Europe allowing for the abuse of the UK benefit system through benefit tourism, a huge strain on our public services due to the open door policy and vast amounts of money paid to the EU that could be better spent on public services within the UK.
Laws that we had a hand in designing.
Benefit tourism is a tiny problem. Benefits aren't a huge problem compared to other stuff going on. Immigrants add more to the economy than they take out.
Lots of immigrants work in our public services. The NHS, for example, would be buggered without immigrant labour.
The amount paid to the EU sounds like a big number, but it's about 1% of GDP, probably less. Not exactly an economy breaker, is it? If the economy shrinks by 1% (which is not unreasonable) then your saving is gone.
Still, we'll have Boris in charge, what could possibly go wrong?
Yes, terribly ironic poster. With the amount of autonomy and reward the REMAIN description is offering, it looks like a self-fulfilling prophecy for the OUT, and the LEAVE description seems to be the outers' perception of the IN.
This is also very interesting:
In other news, a recently conducted poll has revealed that Turkeys intend to vote for Christmas.
Laws that we had a hand in designing.
Benefit tourism is a tiny problem. Benefits aren't a huge problem compared to other stuff going on. Immigrants add more to the economy than they take out.
Lots of immigrants work in our public services. The NHS, for example, would be buggered without immigrant labour.
The amount paid to the EU sounds like a big number, but it's about 1% of GDP, probably less. Not exactly an economy breaker, is it? If the economy shrinks by 1% (which is not unreasonable) then your saving is gone.
Still, we'll have Boris in charge, what could possibly go wrong?
Benefit tourism is a tiny problem. Benefits aren't a huge problem compared to other stuff going on. Immigrants add more to the economy than they take out.
Lots of immigrants work in our public services. The NHS, for example, would be buggered without immigrant labour.
The amount paid to the EU sounds like a big number, but it's about 1% of GDP, probably less. Not exactly an economy breaker, is it? If the economy shrinks by 1% (which is not unreasonable) then your saving is gone.
Still, we'll have Boris in charge, what could possibly go wrong?

That is why I want out of the EU and a control put on immigration such as the Australian points system which seems to work brilliantly for them so why is it so wrong for us? Those who are coming to work and and have needed skills get in. Australia is just one example. Try getting residency in North America without meeting a required skills list and other criteria. Those who want to come to freeload do not get in. That is what I want to see and no one will ever change my mind on that opinion.
As for the laws we had a hand in designing can you give me proof that was the case say for example Brussels making us have only certain types of light bulbs or even more of a waste of time/money only certain shaped bananas? In fact two others, the banning of hoovers with powerful motors and the ban on selling eggs by the dozen and making them be sold on weight. It's this pathetic load of bollox I want to see the back of.
And try telling those on the NHS wanting treatment that is deemed too expensive or a lack of machines that the amount paid to the EU wouldn't help instead the NHS fund their treatment/buy more machines.
Last edited by An0n0m0us; Jun 22, 2016 at 05:59 PM.
Slightly left field solution, why not unify the benefit systems of all EU member states. You'd stop benefit tourism overnight if we paid the same state benefits as everyone else. Then you'd only get the migrants coming over for work.
For the record, I don't hold anything personal against any remain voter. In fact, I like quite a few of the ones shown on the poll, and didn't mean to insult them by my earlier posts. I wrote the things I did to elicit the responses that I knew would inevitably follow... to expose the hypocrisy of a certain few. They can call leave voters thick and it's perfectly acceptable, but when I suggest the same for remain voters... well, we've all seen the vulgar language and name-calling that ensued.
I won't be posting anymore on this thread, at least not until after the result. I'm bored of arguing on the internet with arrogant bigots.
This is the constant misconception by the remain campaign over immigration that those voting leave want a complete blockade of immigration. No we don't! I have no issue with immigration when it's a skilled workforce that comes to work here. I want them to come here as much as anyone else and I don't care where they come from. What I don't want is as it is now which is a free for all where benefit tourism is clearly happening and open to abuse. Not only benefits being abused but public services too such as the NHS.
That is why I want out of the EU and a control put on immigration such as the Australian points system which seems to work brilliantly for them so why is it so wrong for us? Those who are coming to work and and have needed skills get in. Australia is just one example. Try getting residency in North America without meeting a required skills list and other criteria. Those who want to come to freeload do not get in. That is what I want to see and no one will ever change my mind on that opinion.
As for the laws we had a hand in designing can you give me proof that was the case say for example Brussels making us have only certain types of light bulbs or even more of a waste of time/money only certain shaped bananas? In fact two others, the banning of hoovers with powerful motors and the ban on selling eggs by the dozen and making them be sold on weight. It's this pathetic load of bollox I want to see the back of.
As for light bulbs, the old type were horribly energy inefficient, what is wrong with getting rid of them? I neither know nor care whether we had a say or not, it was, and is, a good thing.
The NHS has been failing for years and years, nowt to do with immigrants. Successive governments have failed it. The issues are complex and not necessarily just down to money or population. Leaving will definitely not solve it. Hell, Farage and some of the Conservatives want to dismantle it even further, will you manage to blame that on immigrants too?
don't even know eu would have em
Last edited by dpb; Jun 22, 2016 at 07:55 PM.



















:rolleye s:

