Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

800 Migrants Dead

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 April 2015, 08:23 PM
  #61  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Maz
No missed it, drat! Anything done by Jimmy McGovern is usually well worth a watch.
Yeah, it's well worth a viewing.
Old 27 April 2015, 12:27 PM
  #62  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
Like what? What is the answer to fix the problem? To make their life so much better they want to stay put in their own country.

We're lucky. Yes, but seeing you acknowledge that, why aren't we all giving every penny you and I have to better their situation?

The uncomfortable truth is you don't want to, because you don't want to be put yourself into poverty, you can't be that self-righteous as you can still afford to use a device capable of internet access. Any reasonable person wouldn't think highly of a government that puts foreign aid in higher priority to the people that elected it - picture it...a party's manifesto states it'll spend its NHS and social care budgets on foreign affairs...a clear vote winner for the masses!

We can't even sort out Famagusta which should be a easily resolvable issue. How the hell do you think we can sort out the majority of North African and Middle East continents?

This is the Superman problem....he cannot save everyone, its a cruel harsh fact. Go ahead, feel bad about it, freely accuse others of not appearing to care enough to make yourself feel better, but it won't ever change anything.
Interesting that you choose to attack my position by jumping to an extreme position

It's a strange world where people get more emotional about fekin Jeremy Clarkson than they do about hundreds of people drowning whilst trying to escape their miserable existance

On what planet is spending 0.7% of GDP prioritising foreign aid above the needs of the people of the UK. That strikes me as a pretty flakey argument.

Last edited by Martin2005; 27 April 2015 at 02:52 PM.
Old 27 April 2015, 12:29 PM
  #63  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
Most foreign "aid" is squandered by those in power who are just taking the Government's bribe to stay on board. Genuine need would be met under UKIP's manifesto if you took the trouble to read it.

Let's start with Somalia. What would you suggest that isn't going to involve military intervention?

Re privileged, you are absolutely correct, which is why I would fight tooth and nail to keep it the way it is.
UKIP want to cut overseas aid, not help make the world better. I think you need to get that straight.
Old 27 April 2015, 01:38 PM
  #64  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Interesting that you choose to attack my position by jumping to an extreme position

It's a strange world where people get more emotional about fekin Jeremy Clarkson than they do about hundreds of people drowning whilst trying to escape their miserable existance

On what planet is spending 0.7% of GDP prioriting foreign aid above the needs of the people of the UK. That strikes me as a pretty flakey argument.
That's a bit low, look, you love to post on here and lambast someone for having an opinion that is self righteous and other to your own, but at the same time never give a practical workable solution to the problem.

Attack me about posting opinions in a Clarkson thread, but note this, you are also wasting time posting stuff on here, so its a moot statement to make:..Regardless of our opinions posting them on scoobynet won't save migrants from drowning.

If you cared that much you'd be out there helping rather than expecting someone else to do it and wasting time on here moaning about snetters not wanting to get involved or showing enough empathy.

Last edited by ALi-B; 27 April 2015 at 01:40 PM.
Old 27 April 2015, 05:01 PM
  #65  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
UKIP want to cut overseas aid, not help make the world better. I think you need to get that straight.
To make the world better, we first have to make the UK better. All of us ending up in the sea isn't going to help one bit is it?
UKIP quite correctly point out that most "overseas aid" is a sweetener and no more.
Where would you say our cash has done the most good? Argentina maybe? (£220 million over 20 years)
Old 27 April 2015, 05:19 PM
  #66  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
To make the world better, we first have to make the UK better. All of us ending up in the sea isn't going to help one bit is it?
UKIP quite correctly point out that most "overseas aid" is a sweetener and no more.
Where would you say our cash has done the most good? Argentina maybe? (£220 million over 20 years)
You make a really good argument for spending the current budget more effectively, this I totally support.

The whole argument UKIP are using is just a 'fig leaf' for spending less though.
Old 27 April 2015, 05:34 PM
  #67  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
You make a really good argument for spending the current budget more effectively, this I totally support.

The whole argument UKIP are using is just a 'fig leaf' for spending less though.
Ok, so what if there simply wasn't any way of ensuring that budget got spent more effectively? Would you then finally agree it's better just not to spend it at all, and use the money here instead?
Old 27 April 2015, 05:36 PM
  #68  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
Ok, so what if there simply wasn't any way of ensuring that budget got spent more effectively? Would you then finally agree it's better just not to spend it at all, and use the money here instead?
Yes of course.
Old 27 April 2015, 06:07 PM
  #69  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Yes of course.
Obvious follow-up question then, what would it take to convince you we're already at or very close to that point right now?
Old 27 April 2015, 06:34 PM
  #70  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
Obvious follow-up question then, what would it take to convince you we're already at or very close to that point right now?
Some facts
Old 29 April 2015, 07:40 PM
  #71  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.ukip.org/r?u=https%3A%2F%...hreattociv&n=1
Old 29 April 2015, 08:00 PM
  #72  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Getting desperate now is he not? ....before he's perhaps had some relevant points


I've just seen channel 4 debate in which Mr ukip of Leeds could only come up with immigrants as a reason for young women not being able to afford to rent a place

He got a less than courteous response
Old 29 April 2015, 09:53 PM
  #73  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
So ISIS are using rafts now are they?

This bloke is defies belief. Still I guess his 'dog wistles' are heard loud and clear by some weak minded souls.

Could be worse though; they could be ISIS terrorists infected with HIV

Last edited by Martin2005; 29 April 2015 at 10:00 PM.
Old 29 April 2015, 10:27 PM
  #74  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Re HIV..


Old 29 April 2015, 10:30 PM
  #75  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
So ISIS are using rafts now are they?

This bloke is defies belief. Still I guess his 'dog wistles' are heard loud and clear by some weak minded souls.

Could be worse though; they could be ISIS terrorists infected with HIV
Hey, at least you watched it and gave a considered response. Not everybody will agree with you that we should have open doors, that's all.
Old 29 April 2015, 10:31 PM
  #76  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
Re HIV..


well there we have it then, undeniable proof

I hope he didn't get HIV in a 'gay way' because UKIP don't like them either
Old 29 April 2015, 10:38 PM
  #77  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

How exactly does he KNOW every other patient is an immigrant?
Old 29 April 2015, 10:46 PM
  #78  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
How exactly does he KNOW every other patient is an immigrant?
Oh, I don't know, lucky guess in the waiting room?
Old 29 April 2015, 10:49 PM
  #79  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
well there we have it then, undeniable proof

I hope he didn't get HIV in a 'gay way' because UKIP don't like them either
That's your interpretation.

Re the letter above, just read it, the details make sense, as in why are the people so busy if the levels of home grown HIV are falling?
Old 29 April 2015, 10:57 PM
  #80  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Health service is stretched, fullstop

Only thing can do is raise taxes take out private


This is yet another awful faux pas from ukip
Old 30 April 2015, 12:12 AM
  #81  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
Hey, at least you watched it and gave a considered response. Not everybody will agree with you that we should have open doors, that's all.
Could you point to where I've EVER SAID we should have 'open doors' immigration ?
Old 30 April 2015, 07:42 AM
  #82  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Some facts
Isn't this basically asking me to prove a negative? Surely you should be able to point to some facts showing that spending has brought benefits? Particularly after already conceding that the way it's being done right now is far from optimal.
Old 30 April 2015, 09:09 AM
  #83  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
Isn't this basically asking me to prove a negative? Surely you should be able to point to some facts showing that spending has brought benefits? Particularly after already conceding that the way it's being done right now is far from optimal.
It's not even remotely like trying to prove a negative.
You said we'd reached a point where no more aid could be efficiently spent.
To repeat, that's YOUR statement, so I assume you have something to back up such a bold claim.
Old 30 April 2015, 10:24 AM
  #84  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
UKIP want to cut overseas aid, not help make the world better. I think you need to get that straight.
Fascinating you are more bothered by helping foreigners than you are the people of the UK and to be honest i'm a bit sick of hearing it.

UKIP have made it perfectly clear their reasoning for cutting foreign aid and that is so it is invested in this country, mainly the NHS, that needs massive investment in it's public services. That in turn helps our own population, especially those in desperate need.

Whilst their are people in the UK suffering and unable to get the health care they need due to the cost of that care being too expensive for NHS trusts to pay for I couldn't give a flying **** about those overseas.

How about sort out looking after those in this country first such as the young children with terrible illness and disease who desperately need better funded health care whether it be medication or more/better machines to treat them and stop paying out vast sums of money overseas for it to go in the pockets of corrupt organisations?

When this country is sufficiently caring for it's own and there is no one suffering here in the UK then it is time to start helping those overseas.
Old 30 April 2015, 10:30 AM
  #85  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
Fascinating you are more bothered by helping foreigners than you are the people of the UK and to be honest i'm a bit sick of hearing it.

UKIP have made it perfectly clear their reasoning for cutting foreign aid and that is so it is invested in this country, mainly the NHS, that needs massive investment in it's public services. That in turn helps our own population, especially those in desperate need.

Whilst their are people in the UK suffering and unable to get the health care they need due to the cost of that care being too expensive for NHS trusts to pay for I couldn't give a flying **** about those overseas.

How about sort out looking after those in this country first such as the young children with terrible illness and disease who desperately need better funded health care whether it be medication or more/better machines to treat them and stop paying out vast sums of money overseas for it to go in the pockets of corrupt organisations?

When this country is sufficiently caring for it's own and there is no one suffering here in the UK then it is time to start helping those overseas.
There is no amount of money that can be spend on the NHS. Your's is an argument for financial collapse.

What is this nonsense about 'looking after our own first' we already do that, if we didn't then you'd have a decent point to make. Need I remind you that our international commitment to overseas aid is 0.7% of GDP - this hardly amounts to prioritising others over our own.

If this really mattered then you'd be arguing for some fairly chunky increases in taxation

Last edited by Martin2005; 30 April 2015 at 10:33 AM.
Old 30 April 2015, 10:36 AM
  #86  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys, can you sort your use of the apostrophe out? Cheers, from the SN grammar police
Old 30 April 2015, 11:06 AM
  #87  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
There is no amount of money that can be spend on the NHS. Your's is an argument for financial collapse.

What is this nonsense about 'looking after our own first' we already do that, if we didn't then you'd have a decent point to make. Need I remind you that our international commitment to overseas aid is 0.7% of GDP - this hardly amounts to prioritising others over our own.

If this really mattered then you'd be arguing for some fairly chunky increases in taxation
Are you denying billions of £'s are sent abroad in foreign aid? I don't care what percentage it is of GDP, the fact is those billions could buy a hell of a lot of stuff for the NHS whether it be more surgeons, more beds, more expensive medication etc etc.

It doesn't need increases in taxation, it needs to stop being wasted by being sent abroad.

It wasn't long ago it flared up how much was being sent to India from the UK in foreign aid, yet this is a country that spends vast amounts on a space programme and nuclear weapons programme. They shouldn't be getting a penny in foreign aid.

Last edited by An0n0m0us; 30 April 2015 at 11:07 AM.
Old 30 April 2015, 11:31 AM
  #88  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
Are you denying billions of £'s are sent abroad in foreign aid? I don't care what percentage it is of GDP, the fact is those billions could buy a hell of a lot of stuff for the NHS whether it be more surgeons, more beds, more expensive medication etc etc.

It doesn't need increases in taxation, it needs to stop being wasted by being sent abroad.

It wasn't long ago it flared up how much was being sent to India from the UK in foreign aid, yet this is a country that spends vast amounts on a space programme and nuclear weapons programme. They shouldn't be getting a penny in foreign aid.
Brilliant - the space programme argument!

You're a clever chap why not think more deeply about that one?
Old 30 April 2015, 01:43 PM
  #89  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
It's not even remotely like trying to prove a negative.
You said we'd reached a point where no more aid could be efficiently spent.
To repeat, that's YOUR statement, so I assume you have something to back up such a bold claim.
No I did not, What I actually said was that we'd run out of ways of trying to ensure that any of it was spent effectively.

Aside from that one small but important detail, you still seem glaringly oblivious to the fact that in pretty much any other circumstance, a person or organization planning to spend any money on something would try to check first whether it was going to be put to good use, not just hand over the cash and hope for the best. You on the other hand seem to think it's a better default position to have to spend a set amount indefinitely, no matter the end outcome, with the only small concession to financial common sense being that you might make a bit of effort to check afterwards that it hasn't all been wasted. Frankly, it beggars belief that any competent adult could think that way.
Old 30 April 2015, 01:48 PM
  #90  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
No I did not, What I actually said was that we'd run out of ways of trying to ensure that any of it was spent effectively.

Aside from that one small but important detail, you still seem glaringly oblivious to the fact that in pretty much any other circumstance, a person or organization planning to spend any money on something would try to check first whether it was going to be put to good use, not just hand over the cash and hope for the best. You on the other hand seem to think it's a better default position to have to spend a set amount indefinitely, no matter the end outcome, with the only small concession to financial common sense being that you might make a bit of effort to check afterwards that it hasn't all been wasted. Frankly, it beggars belief that any competent adult could think that way.
Nice try at putting words in my mouth there

And you are now blustering because you cannot possibly back up your claim

Last edited by Martin2005; 30 April 2015 at 01:50 PM.


Quick Reply: 800 Migrants Dead



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 AM.