View Poll Results: Do you believe the official theory
Yes
66
52.80%
No
45
36.00%
Unsure
14
11.20%
Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll
World Trade Centre poll
27 January 2015, 08:56 PM
#308
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was a controlled demolition on WTC7.
WTC-6 is talking point regarding damage!
Last edited by stipete75; 27 January 2015 at 08:58 PM.
27 January 2015, 08:58 PM
#309
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Muslim terrorists living in caves thousands of miles away, there is not a definitive single piece of evidence linking bin laden to 9/11, al-Queda offered to hand bin laden over to the US but wanted proof first, Bush had zero proof!
It was a controlled demolition on WTC7.
WTC-6 is talking point regarding damage!
It was a controlled demolition on WTC7.
WTC-6 is talking point regarding damage!
Do yu mean WTC-7?
27 January 2015, 10:58 PM
#311
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'll check my gps
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Muslim terrorists living in caves thousands of miles away, there is not a definitive single piece of evidence linking bin laden to 9/11, al-Queda offered to hand bin laden over to the US but wanted proof first, Bush had zero proof!
It was a controlled demolition on WTC7.
WTC-6 is talking point regarding damage!
It was a controlled demolition on WTC7.
WTC-6 is talking point regarding damage!
27 January 2015, 11:06 PM
#312
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I say again, zero factual proof.
27 January 2015, 11:40 PM
#313
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'll check my gps
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
28 January 2015, 02:55 PM
#314
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Muslim terrorists living in caves thousands of miles away, there is not a definitive single piece of evidence linking bin laden to 9/11, al-Queda offered to hand bin laden over to the US but wanted proof first, Bush had zero proof!
It was a controlled demolition on WTC7.
WTC-6 is talking point regarding damage!
It was a controlled demolition on WTC7.
WTC-6 is talking point regarding damage!
Al Qaeda never offered to hand over Bin Laden, but the Taliban did. As nutty as the Taliban are, they knew the US would come after him and I imagine that offer was through self preservation rather than anything else.
There is no evidence of a controlled demolition, except a few quotes taken out of context or misunderstood, and conspiracy theorists not understanding what happened, and blindly refusing to believe the explanations because it doesn't fit a conspiracy.
28 January 2015, 02:59 PM
#315
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's pretty clear that what transpired on the day is true. The only question, I think, that could possibly not be unequivocal is who. I believe it was Muslim terrorists, I dno't see why the US govt would do it, what they would gain, it's too hard to keep secret.
Occam's razor.
Occam's razor.
28 January 2015, 03:46 PM
#316
Did I just read that right, you want actual factual proof? It's a conspiracy conjured up by the US Government to blame OBL.
28 January 2015, 04:14 PM
#317
Scooby Regular
I think it's pretty clear that what transpired on the day is true. The only question, I think, that could possibly not be unequivocal is who. I believe it was Muslim terrorists, I dno't see why the US govt would do it, what they would gain, it's too hard to keep secret.
Occam's razor.
Occam's razor.
but "Saudi" Muslim terrorists - that must have been a blow to the narrative Bush et al wanted to portray in the immediate aftermath of 911 -
the links between Bush and the House of Saud are pretty clear - and documented
as Al Gore would say an "inconvenient truth"
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 28 January 2015 at 04:15 PM.
28 January 2015, 04:45 PM
#318
what WAS downplayed was the fact that they were not just "Muslim" terrorists
but "Saudi" Muslim terrorists - that must have been a blow to the narrative Bush et al wanted to portray in the immediate aftermath of 911 -
the links between Bush and the House of Saud are pretty clear - and documented
as Al Gore would say an "inconvenient truth"
but "Saudi" Muslim terrorists - that must have been a blow to the narrative Bush et al wanted to portray in the immediate aftermath of 911 -
the links between Bush and the House of Saud are pretty clear - and documented
as Al Gore would say an "inconvenient truth"
28 January 2015, 04:48 PM
#319
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
28 January 2015, 05:03 PM
#321
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
28 January 2015, 05:15 PM
#323
Scooby Regular
are you doubting the central narrative - that OBL was shot dead in abbottabad
28 January 2015, 05:22 PM
#325
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
28 January 2015, 06:03 PM
#328
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Likewise, as there isn't a single piece of evidence linking it to the US government, where does that leave us?
Al Qaeda never offered to hand over Bin Laden, but the Taliban did. As nutty as the Taliban are, they knew the US would come after him and I imagine that offer was through self preservation rather than anything else.
There is no evidence of a controlled demolition, except a few quotes taken out of context or misunderstood, and conspiracy theorists not understanding what happened, and blindly refusing to believe the explanations because it doesn't fit a conspiracy.
Al Qaeda never offered to hand over Bin Laden, but the Taliban did. As nutty as the Taliban are, they knew the US would come after him and I imagine that offer was through self preservation rather than anything else.
There is no evidence of a controlled demolition, except a few quotes taken out of context or misunderstood, and conspiracy theorists not understanding what happened, and blindly refusing to believe the explanations because it doesn't fit a conspiracy.
I'm pretty sure John Kerry and Silverstein separately admitted the fall of wtc-7 was a controlled demolition or pull for safety reasons? How can those quotes be misunderstood?
I think overall there is probrarly more independent evidence supporting the theories that 911 was an inside job than osama's men, if not maybe 50/50?
28 January 2015, 06:19 PM
#329
Scooby Regular
Excuse me, I meant the Taliban.
I'm pretty sure John Kerry and Silverstein separately admitted the fall of wtc-7 was a controlled demolition or pull for safety reasons? How can those quotes be misunderstood?
I think overall there is probrarly more independent evidence supporting the theories that 911 was an inside job than osama's men, if not maybe 50/50?
I'm pretty sure John Kerry and Silverstein separately admitted the fall of wtc-7 was a controlled demolition or pull for safety reasons? How can those quotes be misunderstood?
I think overall there is probrarly more independent evidence supporting the theories that 911 was an inside job than osama's men, if not maybe 50/50?
Unless you mean a bloke in his garden with too much time on his hands, a chemistry set and an angle grinder or someone using the term "pull"
Which been thoroughly debunked
Gives us some actual evidence - surely there is some if all the building were rigged for explosives
28 January 2015, 07:31 PM
#330
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Credible witness statements from firefighters to experts in all different fields.
Witnesses who have died in suspicious suicides and car accidents post 911.
Confessions of wtc7 being pulled on camera.
Molten steel
Osama publicly denying he had any part of 911 at first.
A fat Osama suddenly admitting in a dodgy camera interview he was cause of 911.
Small hole in pentagon.
No grass damage to the front of the pentagon.
No CCTV worth mentioning.
Bush's brother in charge of security at the wtc.
Documented Power outages and floor shutdowns in the weeks leading up to 911.
In wtc2 a company called baseline had 78/79 floors just below the planes entry point, the company director has history with a nano thermite company, also is very well connected with the government.
Wtc1 had fireproofing modifications upgrades in late 2000 on floors 92-100(documented) the planes entry point was floors 94-99.
Chain of command were all busy and doing something on the day of the attacks.
Air defence failures.
The pentagon attack side was newly renovated.
America rehearsed a 911 attack in 2000 including the pentagon being hit.
Dodgy inside trading in the days prior to 911,,billions pre 911.
Wtc towers insurance, privatised just before the attacks.
The magic passport.
Air traffic control tapes destroyed as was the planes black boxes.
The 911 commission unanswered questions.......approx 400 in total. Why?
Faulty radios causing the deaths of the first responder firefighters, expendable?
The media blackout of prominent doubters,US congress, retired high ranking military officers, former ministers etc.
The pentagons missing trillions pre 9/11' announced on 9/10.
Project northwoods?
And many
Many
Many more unanswered questions and coincides.
Speculations, red herrings,false information, counter arguments.
Witnesses who have died in suspicious suicides and car accidents post 911.
Confessions of wtc7 being pulled on camera.
Molten steel
Osama publicly denying he had any part of 911 at first.
A fat Osama suddenly admitting in a dodgy camera interview he was cause of 911.
Small hole in pentagon.
No grass damage to the front of the pentagon.
No CCTV worth mentioning.
Bush's brother in charge of security at the wtc.
Documented Power outages and floor shutdowns in the weeks leading up to 911.
In wtc2 a company called baseline had 78/79 floors just below the planes entry point, the company director has history with a nano thermite company, also is very well connected with the government.
Wtc1 had fireproofing modifications upgrades in late 2000 on floors 92-100(documented) the planes entry point was floors 94-99.
Chain of command were all busy and doing something on the day of the attacks.
Air defence failures.
The pentagon attack side was newly renovated.
America rehearsed a 911 attack in 2000 including the pentagon being hit.
Dodgy inside trading in the days prior to 911,,billions pre 911.
Wtc towers insurance, privatised just before the attacks.
The magic passport.
Air traffic control tapes destroyed as was the planes black boxes.
The 911 commission unanswered questions.......approx 400 in total. Why?
Faulty radios causing the deaths of the first responder firefighters, expendable?
The media blackout of prominent doubters,US congress, retired high ranking military officers, former ministers etc.
The pentagons missing trillions pre 9/11' announced on 9/10.
Project northwoods?
And many
Many
Many more unanswered questions and coincides.
Speculations, red herrings,false information, counter arguments.